Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama-Clinton 2012: does it make any sense to you?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 04:29 AM
Original message
Poll question: Obama-Clinton 2012: does it make any sense to you?
Edited on Wed Oct-06-10 04:46 AM by Ken Burch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. Explanation of my vote for "Other Other"...
While I think that ES&S, the corporation that just bought out Diebold and now has an 80% lock on U.S. voting machines--all run on 'TRADE SECRET,' PROPRIETARY programming code with virtually no audit/recount controls--might balk at Clinton on social issues--ES&S, after all, was initially funded by reclusive rightwing billionaire Howard Ahmanson, who also gave one million dollars to the extremist 'christian' Chalcedon foundation (which touts the death penalty for homosexuals, among other things)--(I am not kidding--that's the kind of folks who are 'counting' all our 'votes' with 'TRADE SECRET' code)--I think they might figure that her promotion of "free trade for the rich" outweighs the social 'downsides' and might let Obama/Clinton win, if the rightwing coup d'etat to come is not yet quite ripe.

But if the rightwing coup d'etat to come IS ripe, then it won't matter.

:patriot:

Our first order of business should be getting rid of the 'TRADE SECRET' voting machines. We can't even prove that Obama/Biden were elected (although I think they were--albeit with a shaved mandate). I'd bet money that at least one third of Congress was NOT elected. Interesting that betting and guessing is all we can do. Nobody counts votes any more. They're all just blips on a screen in some rightwing billionaire's nerd dungeon. Return the people to the voting process; count the votes in PUBLIC VIEW--and we might have something--a rather great idea: Democracy!

"Other Other" is a protest vote. Another blip on a screen. Ah, me!

:grouphug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Voting rules are made state by state
So speak to your State. Change your State. I can only address my own. States handle the elections. If your votes are counted in a billionaire's basement, that is an issue only the people of your State can address, others have no standing to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Fair Enough.
Thanks for the explanation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky 13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. Oh please, who here really cares? Show of hands?
It's six of one, half dozen of another.

Corporate interest serving candidate #1 vs corporate interest serving candidate #2.
Gays should accept separate but equal candidate #1 vs gays should accept separate but equal candidate #2.

Give me a candidate who differs from the points above and I might start to give half a fuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. You do raise a lot of valid points.
I was just fascinated that this was suddenly the rumor du jour.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky 13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-10 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. It's an interesting rumor, but...
... honestly I don't see it happening and I think it's from right-wingers trying to stir the pot.

Now, tell me he wants Kucinich or Sanders to be his VP and maybe I'll get excited!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-10 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I'd be down with that.
He needs somebody with some passion.

Grayson would be good, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. It's a dumb idea
If Obama/Clinton 2012 wins, then what happens in 2016? Hillary will be getting a bit long in the tooth to run for President... she'll be 69 on election day, and we ripped McCain pretty good for being 73 and trying to be president. So then who runs in 2016? Some new person, maybe, but what are their odds of winning without the experience of being veep?


I'd rather that Biden either run with Obama again in 2012, then retire in 2014 and let Obama's pick for a new VP get a couple of years experience before running for President in 2016; OR Biden be a one-term VP and have an Obama/______ ticket in 2012, with Biden retiring on January 20th, 2013.


Obama/Grayson... yum!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. When I see it happen I will simply smile...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 02:40 AM
Response to Original message
8. Does anyone vote because of the running mate?
I don't think so.

Whether she's the Sec'y of State or VP, whose vote would change?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-10 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Bob Woodward's, maybe?
Edited on Fri Oct-08-10 01:48 PM by Ken Burch
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-10 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. I'd say many people voted for McCain because of Palin...
un-enthused RWers who weren't happy with McCain. But then again, many people voted AGAINST McCain because of Palin, too. So, I think VP choice DOES matter. And Obama won big with Biden.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC