Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nadler Dismantles Right-Wing Arguments...‘We Do Not Put The Bill Of Rights…Up To A Vote’

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 10:03 AM
Original message
Nadler Dismantles Right-Wing Arguments...‘We Do Not Put The Bill Of Rights…Up To A Vote’
Think Progress: Nadler Dismantles Right-Wing Arguments Against Mosque: ‘We Do Not Put The Bill Of Rights…Up To A Vote’

This morning on CNN’s State of the Union, New York congressmen Jerrold Nadler (D) effectively dismantled the arguments of his fellow Empire State colleague Peter King (R), who has been one of the most outspoken opponents of the new Islamic center project in lower Manhattan.

King argued that, while he respects Muslims’ “right” to build a new center, “they should listen to public opinion” and “should voluntarily move the mosque away from Ground Zero.” Nadler, the chairman of the House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, explained, “We do not put the Bill of Rights…to a vote. The reason we have a Bill of Rights is that you have your religious rights…whether majorities like you or not, frankly.

<...>

“(O)bjecting to this mosque would be as objectionable if you wouldn’t object to a church or a synagogue in the same place because that’s blaming all Islam and you can’t blame an entire religion,” Nadler explained. He then ticked through three prominent examples of GOP hypocrisy on the “Ground Zero mosque”:

  1. Nadler: “One, there is a mosque in the Pentagon, which is also hallowed ground. No one objects to that.” (Link)

  2. Nadler: “Second, the people who want to build this facility, which is partially a mosque and partially a community center, have a mosque a few blocks away from there, which no one has objected to.” (Link)

  3. Nadler: “I would take the sincerity of many of the Republican critics of this…if they were supporting, as Peter is, but very few other Republicans are, the bill to give health care coverage to the 9/11 heroes and responders which all but 12 Republicans voted against in the House last week.” (Link)





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why does the right want to steal our freedom of religion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. They not only want to steal your religious rights, but they want to
take away your birth rights too by amending the 14th amendment. THEN they have the balls to say they're constitution originalists!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. BECAUSE they want to steal our freedom of religion.
Forcing the state to step in here would establish a precedent, without which they cannot build their christian theocracy in the US.

This is the wedge, the knife blade, and the end result will be the Republic of Gilead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Freedom of Religion
Only applies to who THEY want it to apply to- nobody else! They'll stomp their feet, howl, and protest loudly whenever they feel that their "freedom of religion" is *threatened*- even if the only way that it is *threatened* is whenever they don't have the "freedom" to harass and oppress people with whom they disagree- but when the time comes to stand up for the religious freedom of other people of other faiths, they could care less or, as in this case, work against them if they just don't like something about them. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. 12 republicans voted for?
Only 12 Rs voted to provide health coverage to 9/11 responders?

WTF is wrong with the republicans that they voted against good health care for the 9/11 first responders?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Excellent question
Good for Nadler to point out that, for all of the Republican's bluster and outrage about 9/11 and *concern* for the residents of NYC and their feelings about this community center, all but 12 of them won't even lift a pinky to help out people who risked their lives (and health) to try to save people as the WTC and Pentagon were engulfed in flames and people were trying to escape. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. This time next year
Maybe we will have less of those idiots voting in our congress?

Maybe next year we will have the super majority we need to overcome all that BS and get back on the path of progress?

One does keep one's hope alive, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. They're disingenuous hypocrites. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC