Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Guidelines on free preventive care released; Sen. Kyl opposed, but takes credit for the provision

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 01:03 PM
Original message
Guidelines on free preventive care released; Sen. Kyl opposed, but takes credit for the provision

New Preventive Services Guidelines Released, Groups Still Await Regulations On Contraception

Today, the administration is unveiling the preventive services insurers will be required to cover with no co-pays or out-of-pocket costs beginning September 23. “Cancer screenings, including mammograms and colonoscopies, as well as obesity prevention services, immunizations, blood pressure screenings and tobacco cessation services are among those that will be available” at no extra charge, the Wall Street Journal reports. Sen. Jon Kyl (R-AZ) took credit for this provision on Monday and Republicans seem to agree that identifying diseases before they become chronic is a smart way to reduce health care spending over the long term.

But as Dana Goldstein pointed out yesterday, many Republicans don’t think the same is true for family planning services, which will also be available at no additional charge. Regulations for women-specific preventive services — the result of Sen. Barbara Mikulski’s (D-MD) amendment — are expected to be issued in the near future, but Republicans are already laying the groundwork for opposition. From Goldstein’s piece:

The conservative groups are particularly worried that a birth control coverage mandate could include teenage girls and young women covered under their parents’ health insurance plans. “People who are insured don’t want to pay for services they don’t need or to which they have moral objections,” said Chuck Donovan, senior researcher at the Heritage Foundation. “Parents want to have a say over what’s covered and what’s not for their children.” <...>

“I don’t want to overstate or understate our level of concern,” said McQuade, the Catholic bishops’ spokesperson. “We consider (birth control) an elective drug. Married women can practice periodic abstinence. Other women can abstain altogether. Not having sex doesn’t make you sick.”

Planed Parenthood and other health organizations are lobbying HHS to include birth control and other family planning provisions in the category of cost-exempt preventive services, noting that increasing co-payments often put birth control out of reach for lower income women. “Average copayments in employer-sponsored insurance have increased considerably over the past decade, to as much as $46 in 2009 for many brand-name drugs,” one study showed.

more



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
williesgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Then Viagra & others shouldn't be covered by insurance either. No sex doesn't make you sick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4lbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Actually, it's been found, that for men, frequent ejaculation helps minimize the risk of prostate
cancer.

So, for men, it's either lots of sex (with gender of choice), or lots of late nights with one hand, a tissue, lotion, and porn.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. What hypocrisy! Catholic bishops, priests having sex with young boys makes us all sick!
But, of course, no one gets pregnant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. Typical
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yeah, Kyl's an ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC