Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

To gop senators' dismay, Petraeus affirmed that “July 2011 is etched in stone.”

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 04:24 PM
Original message
To gop senators' dismay, Petraeus affirmed that “July 2011 is etched in stone.”
To GOP Senators’ Dismay, Petraeus and Flournoy Affirm July 2011 ‘Inflection Point’ in Afghan War
Administration Committed to Transferring Security to Afghans Next Year
By Spencer Ackerman 6/16/10 5:00 PM


At a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing Wednesday on strategy for the war in Afghanistan, a discussion of the Obama administration’s approach to securing the southern Afghan city of Kandahar — a crucial test for the escalated war — was overshadowed by a partisan dispute over the meaning of the administration’s July 2011 “inflection point” for transferring security responsibilities to Afghan forces.

Gen. David Petraeus, commander of U.S. forces in the Middle East and South Asia, and Michele Flournoy, the undersecretary of defense for policy, two architects of the administration’s counterinsurgency strategy in Afghanistan, told incredulous Republican senators on the committee that the rate of troop reductions after July 2011 will be “determined by conditions” on the ground, a formulation repeated by Petraeus at least five times during the three-hour hearing. Both Petraeus and Flournoy expressed confidence that the Afghan government understands the American desire for a “long-term relationship” with Afghanistan long after the United States withdraws the bulk of its troops, providing specific commitments to Afghan security, governance and economic development over the “next five to ten years,” as Flournoy put it.

But several Republicans on the panel expressed dismay that the administration set a date to begin security transfers, and argued that establishing it created confusion in the region over the United States’ commitment to waging the war, including within Afghan President Hamid Karzai’s government. Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) said it was unwise for the administration to leave the impression, in the reported words of White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs, that the date is “etched in stone,” since McCain said Afghan government officials have told him the date makes them doubt the administration’s resolve.

Yet Petraeus affirmed that “July 2011 is etched in stone.”
Prompted by a question from Sen. Ted Kaufman (D-Del.), he reiterated that “July 2011 is the point at which, again, the term ‘responsible drawdown’ of the surge forces begins at a rate to be determined by the conditions” on the ground. The date itself won’t prompt the U.S. to “race for the exist,” Petraeus said, pointing to Obama’s West Point declaration that success in Afghanistan is a “vital national security interest,” a phraseology that Petraeus said signaled steadfastness to the military.

more...

http://washingtonindependent.com/87265/to-gop-senators-dismay-petraeus-and-flournoy-affirm-july-2011-inflection-point-in-afghan-war
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nuclear Unicorn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. I just want them home as safely and quickly as possible
Does that make me selfish?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. No, that makes you normal. I want the same thing. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thank You President Obama. Bring them home safe and sound Petraeus. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. I read an article a little while ago where someone was recalling a conversation with Biden and
somebody.

They were saying to Biden that the draw down date isn't real and we aren't really going to do that. Biden's response was - yes, we are and just watch us because it is going to happen (paraphrase).

It didn't include #'s or anything but it just made it clear that people thinking that it is just a show or kicking the can down the road really don't know the President's intent - and it will be happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aramchek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. but some say Obama never does what he says! how can this be?!?
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
6.  Thanks, babylonsister~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
7. This deserves another kick. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libodem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
8. Bring our troops home!
I heard a blurb on NPR this morning stating that our soldiers over there are committing suicide almost as frequently as are being killed by enemy fire. They must hate it. And a year deployment is a very long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 02:09 AM
Response to Original message
9. Kicking again. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 02:26 AM
Response to Original message
10. I've got my doubts about this piece
For example, I seriously doubt that General Petraeus actually referred to his “responsibility to the troopers”.
Soldiers are "troops". State police are "troopers". It sounds made-up or second-hand to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC