Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Congress Likely to Toughen Volcker Rule in Reform Bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-10 04:54 PM
Original message
Congress Likely to Toughen Volcker Rule in Reform Bill

Merkley, Levin Amendment Could Spark Fight With Wall Street

Large banks have so far survived the Senate financial overhaul debate without any explosive amendments, but that might change real fast.

Sens. Jeff Merkley (D., Ore.) and Carl Levin (D., Mich.) said on Monday they will push an amendment that tries to leverage the Securities and Exchange Commission case against Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and make it illegal for companies to package asset-backed securities if they have a “material conflict of interest” in how those securities are sold.

Sounds complicated, but it’s likely to spark a furious fight on Wall Street where banks don’t want the government telling them which side of deals they can or can’t be on.

Merkley and Levin don’t necessarily speak for the entire Democratic caucus, but they have some heavyweight support for their amendment. The Treasury Department, Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd (D., Conn.), and former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker all back the measure, significantly improving its chances of passing. With the broader debate on financial rules wrapping up, a vote could come as soon as this week on the provision.



Congress Likely to Toughen Volcker Rule in Reform Bill

<...>

Of the three measures relevant to the Volcker Rule, the one by Sens. Carl Levin, D-Mich., and Jeff Merkley, D-Ore., is looking most likely to pass. It won an endorsement this week from Volcker himself, who said it should be made part of the bill.

"We have had several communications with the Merkley-Levin folks, and Mr. Volcker appreciates the hard work they are doing to preserve the intent of the Volcker Rule," a spokesman for Volcker said. "With the strong support of the Treasury, White House and Senator Dodd as well, Chairman Volcker feels very confident that these provisions will make it through the process intact and become law."

It has also been helped by Levin's recent hearings on fraud allegations at Goldman Sachs Group Inc.

"The amendment I'm working on with Sen. Merkley would try to end the conflict of interest that was highlighted in the Goldman Sachs hearing, where firms create financial instruments, sell them to their clients and then bet on their failure," Levin said.

While Levin is still in the process of drafting his amendment in consultation with the White House, it would go beyond the Dodd bill by putting the Volcker Rule into statute by adding a prohibition on proprietary trading to the Bank Holding Company Act and superseding existing authority governing such activities.

link


PROP Trading Amendment: Keeping High-Risk Trading From Bringing Down Our Financial System—Again

People were up in arms about the defeat of Brown-Kaufman (which Krugman insisted wouldn't address the problem that led to the crisis), well this is the bill that directly addresses the problem.







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-10 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Once again, President Obama pushed for and is going to get real and historic reform.
First HCR, now Wall Street.

I guess Congress listened to him when he warned them not to water down the bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-10 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Glass Steagall 2.0
In particular, the congressional bills would require systemically risky financial institutions to (1) pay a fee into a resolution fund for failed institutions, (2) hold less leverage and have greater liquidity, (3) restrict their risk-taking activities (the so-called "Volcker rule," made explicit in the Senate version) and (4) be subject to a resolution process if they fail, one that would resemble the FDIC's current, successful approach for taking over failed banks.

If all these requirements sound familiar, they should - because they roughly mirror the successful protections put in place for deposit insurance in the 1930s. It's a model that worked for generations.

link



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-10 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. That's exactly what it is. Thank you!
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-10 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Why "Roughly Mirror"? Why Not Do The Same?
Added loopholes, that's why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Awesome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-10 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. The banks are going to do all they can to defeat this
The vampire squid will spend billions if they have to. They are the most powerful entity on the planet by far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-10 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. Very good. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
7. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
8. Merkley-Klobuchar amendment passed
S.AMDT.3962
Amends: S.3217 , S.AMDT.3739
Sponsor: Sen Merkley, Jeff (OR) (submitted 5/11/2010) (proposed 5/11/2010)
AMENDMENT PURPOSE:
To prohibit certain payments to loan originators and to require verification by lenders of the ability of consumers to repay loans.

TEXT OF AMENDMENT AS SUBMITTED: CR S3558-3559

STATUS:

5/11/2010:
Amendment SA 3962 proposed by Senator Merkley to Amendment SA 3739.
COSPONSORS(10):

Sen Klobuchar, Amy (MN) - 5/11/2010
Sen Schumer, Charles E. (NY) - 5/11/2010
Sen Snowe, Olympia J. (ME) - 5/11/2010
Sen Brown, Scott P. (MA) - 5/11/2010
Sen Begich, Mark (AK) - 5/11/2010
Sen Boxer, Barbara (CA) - 5/11/2010
Sen Dodd, Christopher J. (CT) - 5/11/2010
Sen Kerry, John F. (MA) - 5/11/2010
Sen Franken, Al (MN) - 5/11/2010
Sen Levin, Carl (MI) - 5/11/2010


Passed 63 to 36


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC