Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A presidential comparison / contrast in pictures. Bush's Katrina versus Obama's Oil Spill...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 09:28 PM
Original message
A presidential comparison / contrast in pictures. Bush's Katrina versus Obama's Oil Spill...
Edited on Sun May-02-10 09:29 PM by jefferson_dem

+


versus


President Barack Obama talks with U.S. Coast Guard Commandant Admiral Thad Allen, who is serving as the National Incident Commander, and Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, aboard Marine One as they fly along the coastline from Venice to New Orleans, La., May 2, 2010. John Brennan, Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism, is in the background. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
av8rdave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. You forgot the air guitar picture...and the birthday cake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lizziegrace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. +1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
O is 44 Donating Member (740 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. O always seems very engaged, the difference is stark!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Jindal appears to be listening intently
I don't know why, but it surprises me to see a Republican acting even remotely respectful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. While I haven't read Laura's book...
.... the passage that was reported was very troubling.

She seems to think the problem that Bush didn't land his plane. She says that it would have been too disruptive and that argument has some merits.

But the problem wasn't that Bush wouldn't land his plane. THIS (as we all know) was the problem....



And if you'll allow me to add a few more photos to your excellent thread...



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. Wow. Our photo ops are better than their photo ops.
Edited on Sun May-02-10 10:04 PM by RufusTFirefly
The San Diego Chicken whupped the Phillie Phanatic.

But what is the relationship between this Kabuki Theater and reality?

Oh, sorry.

Never mind.


Mr. Obama said several times during his presidential campaign that he supported expanded offshore drilling. He noted in his State of the Union address in January that weaning the country from imported oil would require “tough decisions about opening new offshore areas for oil and gas development.”
New York Times


Did he or did he not say this? Please don't give me the Straw Man argument that he is better than Bush. Of course he is. But he could've condemned offshore drilling, but instead he embraced it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
O is 44 Donating Member (740 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Everywhere the President goes there is a photo
opportunity, that does not mean he is not doing something worthwhile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. What? Like condemning offshore drilling?
The whole "drill, baby, drill!" notion was utterly absurd. The fact that our President supported it is distressing.

1. The amount of oil that could be acquired off the East coast is miniscule.
2. What's more, it would have almost no effect on current oil shortages or prices.
3. Even if the amount of oil predicted in that area is made available, it would vanish in days.
4. And besides, it's being drilled by private companies. Who says they have any obligation to supply it to American motorists? Certainly not President Obama. The fact is that the private oil companies will sell their oil to the highest bidder. And that probably won't be us.

In sum, our President, Mr. Hope and Change, bought into a completely bankrupt policy championed by someone who probably has one-half his intellectual capabilities at best. And why?

Now, he is out front and in tastefully composed photos looking concerned about the disaster that resulted from offshore oil drilling -- a policy he endorsed. Gee, who would've thunk it? Are we supposed to forget his statements and positions from just a few weeks ago? The United States of Amnesia, indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
O is 44 Donating Member (740 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I can admit the drill idea was a bad one even
if he was trying to garner Republican support for his energy bill. This disaster would have still happened without the President's statements on limited drilling. The point of the OP was how he is handling the disaster now not about policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 05:05 AM
Response to Reply #9
18. -1
Edited on Mon May-03-10 05:13 AM by jefferson_dem
Nonsense. And I think you know it.

Speaking of "drill baby drill"...

Your "Mr. Hope and Change..." sounds like "America's had enough of 'hopey changey stuff'" http://www.freep.com/article/20100502/NEWS01/5020457/Palin-rips-into-Obama-Democrats
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. Guilt by association and ad hominem
You really traffic in logical fallacies, don't you?

Are you suggesting that by opposing environmentally damaging policies of our president that I am somehow a Palin supporter or a Freeper?

Gee. It must be comforting to live in a binary world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. Defensive much?
I just find it ironic ... that you used the same simpleton, dismissive language about Obama that Palin just served up. That's all. But I can see how that *association* might make you uncomfortable. Deal with it.

Debate energy policy all you want. I'll do the same. But at least try to find a relevant home for your rants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. Project much?
Try reading my post wherein I cite coherent objections to the completely wrong-headed policy of offshore drilling.

I assume you did and simply disregarded the first part of the post because it was too uncomfortable and inconvenient to confront.

Have a nice day.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. You are missing the point entirely.
Edited on Mon May-03-10 10:45 AM by jefferson_dem
I understand that some may take issue with Obama coming out with implicit support for more drilling. I've said so in this thread and others. But the OP is not about energy policy, no matter how much you desperately try to steer it in that direction.

In any case, when one disparages the President as "Mr. Hope and Change" they are basically inviting others to dismiss their policy arguments as unsubstantial.

Yes, you have a nice day as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Wow. You're right.
That one-line, context-free quote surely encapsulates all the "reality" there is about this President, his character and leadership skills, and his administration's energy and environmental policy.

Who needs images...

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Go ahead. Supply the context. You know the rules.
Edited on Sun May-02-10 10:24 PM by RufusTFirefly
I couldn't quote the entire article. You know that as well as I do.
What context?

I'm anxious for you to supply the "Yeah, but.." for Pres. Obama's support of offshore oil drilling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 05:03 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. If Obama hadn't said that - if he had never suggested he was open to offshore drilling -
Edited on Mon May-03-10 05:24 AM by jefferson_dem
how would that have changed whether this incident happened or not, and how he has responded to the crisis? After all, that's the point of the OP.

Hey, I understand you're keen on ridiculing this President at every opportunity, even when you have to invent shit to do it. But sometimes you just end up looking silly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 06:19 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. The incident would have happened no matter what, but would be different
is we wouldn't have had Democrats defending Off shore drilling! And have Democrats telling other Democrats that they are blaming the President for the spill, when in fact they are discussing the political fall out of his decision and how he tied democrats hands in finally winning the issue of off shore drilling.

Because of his flip on off shore drilling, Sarah Palin and republicans have wiggle room.

That is much different than saying Obama is responsible for this particular oil spill. Rush and other idiots claim that.


But any future explored area that becomes a rig that may ruin the environment, obama will have had a hand in.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 06:37 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. I agree with your characterization.
Wiggle room...indeed. As I posted here yesterday, I'm hoping Obama reconsiders his support for drilling as a result of this disaster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntPatsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. This is NOT President Obama's fault...people drive me crazy sometimes....
if you must blame someone, than do the research to find the real culprit or culprits as the case may be, doesn't anyone know how to do simple research that can help one present factual evidence when attempting to write a little story?

And for those people that thrive on conspiracy theories instead of realizing it is what it is, it was an accident, a horrific unforeseen accident by the crew on that rig..

Now for the people who write the checks, I would say they were more than aware that an accident could occur when you have a device that only can assimilate 15,000 pounds of pressure when it was a possibility that that pressure could and obviously did exceed the 15,000


Yes, someone is to blame for this "accident" but it is NOT president Obama and you and those like you waste time and resources needed to get to the heart of the matter by focusing on that obvious little red dot blinking in front of your eyes, distracted is all that will become if you continue to focus on it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Born_A_Truman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Everything is Obama's fault ...
don't you know that?






:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 02:04 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Yup. This is DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #15
21. Straw man argument
Edited on Mon May-03-10 09:43 AM by RufusTFirefly


Nobody on DU to my knowledge is suggesting that this particular oil spill is the President's fault. What is true, unfortunately, is that in capitulating to the "drill, baby, drill" set, he completely lost any moral high ground on this issue. He can't pretend that he didn't support offshore drilling. Because he did. There's no denying it.

Now, on to Clean Coal (sic).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #15
26. Because of Obama
I did not win the lottery saturday night :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
12. Yeah, bush & cheney didn't give a shit..
and President Obama is down there to help.

Now we have a President who is dealing in reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC