Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NATO/Afghan Offensive in Helmand Province shows new strategy and tactics.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 11:01 PM
Original message
NATO/Afghan Offensive in Helmand Province shows new strategy and tactics.
NATO/Afghan forces started the largest offensive since 2001 on Saturday aimed at the largest city that the Taliban has under control.

Major differences in strategy;

1) The basic strategy of the campaign was developed by the Afghan Army and is designed not simply at engineering a military victory but establishing a transition to Afghan control of the city of Marjah, population 75,000.

2) Rather than launching a "shock and awe" campaign that maximizes air attacks and causes the greatest panic among civilian population the allied forces deliberately announced its strategy in advance and dropped leaflets letting the population, and the Taliban, know exactly what was coming. They also have established radio stations on the edge of Marjah to keep the civilian population informed.

3) Tribal elders in Marjah appear to be already assisting the allies:




http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704431404575066953058959716.html?mod=WSJ-hpp-MIDDLENexttoWhatsNewsThird

One of the most publicized initiatives to win over the local population has been the convening of a "shura"—a traditional Afghan council—of Marjah tribal elders since just before the shooting began.

That effort appeared to be yielding a return Monday when 10 men offered up by the shura began working as guides to help allied forces find bombs planted by the insurgents and to find Taliban fighters who have melted back into the population.



4) Taliban continue to use civilian shields to take advantage of NATO/Afghan rules of engagement:



The insurgents appeared to be trying to take advantage of the allied rules of engagement. On Monday, Marines spotted 10 or so fighters approaching the Pork Chop area, with women and children carrying their weapons in bundles.

"They have weapons caches in mosques," said Lt. Greenlief.

The Marines requested an airstrike to hit them after the women and children had left. They were first denied permission by their commanders because of the Taliban fighters' proximity to structures that might contain civilians. When the Marines did get permission, the first attack plane malfunctioned and had to call off the strike.

Finally, the Marines sent out a unit to try to ambush the insurgents as they moved. The tactic forced the fighters into the open, and a Marine jet strafed them, apparently killing nine.



5) The capture of Mullah Baradar, the operational commander of the Taliban in Pakistan on the eve of the large offensive seems to signal that increased Pakistan cooperation will help to cause confusion among the Taliban at a time of maximum impact.

6) Taliban forces appear to prepare to leave after slowing down the offensive with IED booby traps:



Intelligence reports indicate the few hundred insurgents who are still fighting the thousands of U.S, Afghan and British troops in and around Marjah are low on food and ammunition.

Marines in the city also reported that a midlevel Taliban commander had arrived in recent days with orders from Taliban elders in Pakistan to evacuate fighters who could escape. To evade the allied cordon around the town, some insurgents were donning the head-to-toe burkhas worn by Afghan women, the reports said.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Different strategy ultimately means different results......
That's what is happening, even if most won't admit it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 04:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. It is becoming increasingly obvious that Al Queda and the Talilban
are in an increasing state of confusion.

Two big events - Obviously the Christmas day bomber's family was able to convince this guy to tell every detail and operations in Yemen have been completely disrupted.

The capture of Baradar in Pakistan on the eve of the offensive shows that Pakistan is now 'all in' in a united fight.


These two events are a direct line from Obama's statement on the closing of Gitmo, and his less hostile approach to allies. Ironic doesn't really even reach it but the Macho Republican response in the US shows exactly how counterproductive the approach is.

More irony is that as Islamic countries see how idiotic the Republican response is the more they want to cooperate and help Obama win leading to even more successes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 05:07 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. You know I agree with you...but many on DU have said otherwise.
Republicans as of late have either been completely ignoring the success of the President on foreign policy, saying he's just like Bush and rewriting history on it, or just not even broaching the topic all together to say he's setting Republicans up for a trap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. "was developed by the Afghan Army"
I thought they were going by the name "Hashish Army".

Wow. Pretty wicked that they woke up one day and developed an amazing strategy instead of just eating Cheetos all day.

Right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC