Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Conservative Boycott of "Too Liberal" CPAC is ON!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 03:45 AM
Original message
Conservative Boycott of "Too Liberal" CPAC is ON!
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Conservative-Boycott-of-T-by-Steven-Leser-100107-3.html

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
January 7, 2010

By Steven Leser


Just when you thought the Conservatives couldn't get any wackier this year, there is a concerted effort by a growing group of Conservatives to boycott the Conservative Political Action Conference or CPAC.

CPAC is considered THE big party of the year for the "conservative wing" of the Republican Party. It is hosted by the American Conservative Union Foundation among other conservative groups. According to Wikipedia, last years speakers included:

Senator John Cornyn

Representative Ron Paul

Governor Mitt Romney

Governor Mike Huckabee

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell

House Minority Leader John Boehner

Newt Gingrich

John Bolton

Ann Coulter

Rush Limbaugh

Robert Davi

Michele Bachmann

Jonathan Krohn

Ronald Reagan spoke to CPAC a total of 12 times. According to the CPAC website, former Vice President Dick Cheney had this to say about CPAC:

"CPAC has consistently over the years championed those ideas that have made America great: limited government, free enterprise, low taxes and a strong national defense."
- Vice President Dick Cheney
--------------------------------

All that is out the window this year. A boycott is under way led by such weighty conservatives as Liberty University Chancellor Jerry Falwell, Jr., Liberty Counsel founder and chairman Mat Staver, Gary Glenn, President of the American Family Association of Michigan.

What has these über conservatives so riled up?

This year, CPAC has accepted the sponsorship of a conservative gay rights group, GOProud. According to an article on Free Republic, "GOProud advocates same-sex "marriage," a repeal of the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy, and "expanding access to domestic partner benefits" for "homosexuals' "

An announcement on GayPatriot, a conservative Gay blog had this to say about GOProud:


I am thrilled to help announce the birth of a new national gay conservative organization, GOProud. As long-time readers know I have been very critical of the national Log Cabin Republicans for many years.

Their left-of-center positions on important issues have bothered me as LCR has continually sucked the teet of the Gay Leftist agenda. LCR's silence and unwillingness to stand up and be vocal on true gay conservative issues (outing of Republican staffers, increasing threat of gays being selectively aborted, peril gays face by Islamic extremists) has been mind-boggling. And LCR's continued obsession in trashing Republicans, yet letting Democrats get a pass on their gay-related hypocrisies, has been infruriating.

Many of you, friends and critics alike, have told me if I wasn't happy with LCR to do something about it. I have tried shining light on the organization from GayPatriot.org. But many of us felt more had to be done.
-----------------------------------
Politico ran an article about the launch of GOProud that said:


GOPROUD, the new 527 group, will launch next week, according to a media advisory. The contact given for the group is Christopher Barron, a former Log Cabin political director who broke with the group.

"Essentially, there's no voice for gay Republicans or gay conservatives in particular in D.C. right now. Log Cabin has been completely and totally absent here in D.C. for months and months," Barron said. "It has simply moved way too far from the left and is basically indistinguishable from any other gay left organization."

The ideological battle has been playing out in the gay media and on some blogs for a while, spurred in part by the Blade's revelation that the Log Cabin Republicans' biggest backer is a prominent Democrat, Tim Gill. Their complaint, in general, is that Log Cabin has grown indistinguishable from left-leaning gay rights groups.
------------------------------------------------------

Free Republic's Jim Robinson has joined the boycott and had this to say about his reasoning:

"I'll join that boycott. If CPAC is no longer for conservative family values then I want nothing to do with them. They'll have to change their name to HOMOPAC."

- Jim Robinson Founder of Free Republic
-------------------------------------------
This boycott has threatened to upset the applecart at a time when conservatives seem to be cementing their stranglehold over the Republican Party. It also threatens to derail CPAC's efforts to get Sarah Palin to speak at the conference. The former Alaska Governor has not yet confirmed she will attend or speak.

I've written about the Log Cabin Republicans (until now the only gay caucus in the Republican Party) several times in the last 7 years. I started out calling them "abused spouses" for their blind support of Republicans despite the fact that Republican politicians, George W. Bush among them, repeatedly used the LGBT community as pejoratives and wedge issues. Eventually, the Log Cabins realized that obsequious behavior wasn't going to get them anywhere and they became more aggressive. With their aggressiveness, you started to hear about more gay staffers being tolerated in the GOP and the potential for some change down the road.

Apparently, this attempt by the Log Cabins to exert some influence in the GOP and stand by some principles has resulted in a backlash in the form of a rival Republican gay rights group that purports to be more conservative. More likely, you will see GOProud start off the way the Log Cabins started out i.e. being the Republican's doormat. This first sponsored event has them right on track.

GOProud has acceded to sponsoring CPAC without having any speakers being allowed to speak and simultaneously accepted being publicly backhanded in the press by CPAC's organizers. ThinkProgress reported on this on December 23rd:

David Keene, the head of CPAC's main organizing group, tried to calm the potential boycott by using a different tactic. In an e-mail to a right-wing radio host, Keene promised that GOProud would not have a speaking spot and that gay rights issues would not be "open to debate":

In his e-mail response, Keene admitted GOProud "has signed on as a CPAC co-sponsor, but will have no speakers and we told them that, in fact, since opposition to gay marriage, etc are consensus positions (if not unanimous) among conservatives, these topics are not open to debate." <...>
----------------------------
You would have to wonder why any activist group that purports to be attempting to further any issue would accept this kind of treatment by the party they have chosen as their own. Now I know I am going to get comments back to this article from GOProud and LCR members accusing the Democratic Party and President Obama of the same thing and in some ways they are right. I admit that I am embarrassed at how little progress has been made on the Gay rights front over the past 11 months.

I'll even go further than that and say that as a straight person, I cannot face my gay friends in the Democratic Party anymore I am so ashamed by how little has been done for them over the first year of this administration. I feel guilty that I am happy with the administration in most ways except of course with this glaring issue. But that still isn't remotely the same as how gays are treated in the Republican party. Pick any 20 Republican or Conservative groups at random and pick any 20 Democratic or Liberal groups at random and tell each that you would like to have a big gay rights representation at their next national meeting and let's see the reaction you get. Something tells me there will be a statistically significant difference in the amount of groups that are accepting of the gay rights groups between the two sets of organizations.

None of this matters to the social conservatives who normally attend CPAC. To them, CPAC has become hopelessly Liberal by accepting sponsorship from GOProud. Comments to Jim Robinson's article on Free Republic include many references by Freepers who are going to attend CPAC anyway and bring signs of protest against the GOProud participation.

All of this controversy has me looking forward to CPAC for the first time in my life. Conservative internecine fighting is more fun to watch then anything Hollywood produces. I might even buy a ticket and attend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 04:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. They must be mad that the "no opposable thumbs" membership policy didn't go through.
n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 04:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. And who would Unrec this?
I K&R'd BTW.


:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Fucking trolls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parker CA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. Freeper bigots. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billybob537 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 06:20 AM
Response to Original message
3. wow what a group of fine speakers
Looks like the Special Republican Olympics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelgb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
4. lul
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nxylas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
5. Don't you know that teh gay is infectious?
If these fine God-fearing Americans find themselves in the same conference venue as homosexuals, they might turn "funny".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. Please go. It would be a gold mine
of material.

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. You go, GOPROUD! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Number23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. "LCR has continually sucked the teet of the Gay Leftist agenda"
Edited on Thu Jan-07-10 02:41 PM by Number23
Do they not have spellcheckers at GOProud?? And someone to help write some better-sounding analogies? That's just embarrassing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. Here's what RIMJOB has to say:
"Free Republic's Jim Robinson has joined the boycott and had this to say about his reasoning:

"I'll join that boycott. If CPAC is no longer for conservative family values then I want nothing to do with them. They'll have to change their name to HOMOPAC."

- Jim Robinson Founder of Free Republic"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I know. Very hard to understand that kind of bigotry and hatred
I've exchanged some moderately pleasant emails with him in the past on things like condolences for deaths in his family.

But he makes it really hard when he says stuff like that. Disagreeing on stuff like economic policy and health care approach is one thing. I just dont associate with bigots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
13. Priceless. Who knew that 8 guys could cause such a stir

Is 8 too high?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Well, so far, I only see 3-4 names over there on their site
8 might be too many!!!! :-)

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC