|
in corpo-fascist articles on Mujica's win.
Chavez has produced a bigger economic growth rate and has been as popular as Vasquez--and still is--yet they're trying to pit one group of leftist leaders against another, with at least two noticeable tactics: calling one "investor-friendly" and the other not; and ignoring the amazing accomplishments of the "bad left" as well as ignoring the obvious, demonstrable UNITY of leftist leaders in Latin America on numerous important issues and common goals.
I'm seeing it in the Mujica articles ("good left," pro-Lulu/Brazil, "investor-friendly").
This new tactic has been building up for some months--the blatant efforts to portray Lula da Silva/Brazil ("good left") as being at odds with Chavez/Venezuela ("bad left"), and ignoring voluminous evidence to the contrary. (They are close friends and allies, and meet every month to devise policy, and to discuss various mutual ventures and political developments.)
Probably the reason for this "divide and conquer" tactic (trying to create such a false narrative in the corpo-fascist press)--besides the value to the US and its global corporate predators and war profiteers of "divide and conquer" by itself--is that the US wants to "circle the wagons" in the Caribbean/Central America/north South America region and restore US hegemony there --to break up the ALBA trade alliance, topple the new leftist governments in Central America, and--very possibly--instigate a war in this region, using Colombia as the front government, to restore Exxon Mobil/Pentagon control of Venezuela's (and probably Ecuador's) oil. They need to demonize Chavez to do this. And while Lulu and other leaders are having none of it, the demonization is really mostly for our benefit--to create an entirely false impression in most north Americans' minds, that Chavez is a "dictator," a narco-trafficker, a "terrorist lover," a "failure," and so forth, so that our people won't mind too much, and many won't even notice it, when we are dragged into Vietnam II in the jungles of the Amazon to bring down that "communist dictator" who's "causing all the trouble" in Latin America.
Saw this in a report on the Honduran coup by the Zelaya government-in-exile about a month ago: One of the coup generals is quoted as saying that, by their coup, they are "preventing communism from Venezuela reaching the United States." So these are the kinds of discussions going on between Honduras' "School of the Americas"-trained military and the Pentagon and Bushwhacks like Jim DeMint--"preventing communism from Venezuela" reaching up through Central America and the Caribbean, to infect the U.S.
These rightwing forces (and war profiteers) really cannot affect the unity in South America very much, but they can cause huge trouble in the northern/Caribbean/Central American region, where independent governments are just getting off the ground (Guatemala, Nicaragua, El Salvador), where they can pick off weaker countries like Honduras (whereas they failed in Bolivia, because of the unity and economic clout of surrounding leftist governments), and where the countries are extremely poor, having been already stripped of much of their resources, and are beset with drug trafficking, corruption and the militaristic US "war on drugs," and also are still gravely suffering from the aftermath of US violence during the Reagan horrors. Venezuela was successfully helping to unify these countries--an intolerable prospect to the US government. This is corpo-fascist "sweatshop" heaven and the prowling grounds for US war profiteers (along with Colombia).
What I would hate to see--what I would find appalling, in fact--is countries like Brazil, Uruguay and Chile concede the northern region to the U.S. Chavez is fighting the good fight over this. Will they stick with him? So far, they have. I worry about this slimebag US tactic of "divide and conquer" being successful.
|