McClatchy: Iranian arms to Taliban may be retaliation for U.S. policy

[babylonsister]

http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/17296108.htm

Iranian arms to Taliban may be retaliation for U.S. policy
By Jonathan S. Landay
McClatchy Newspapers

WASHINGTON - As NATO troops in Afghanistan have begun intercepting sophisticated Iranian arms bound for the Taliban, U.S., NATO and Afghan officials are growing more concerned about Iranian policy in Afghanistan.

It's long been conventional wisdom that Iran's Shiite Muslim rulers would do nothing to destabilize Afghan President Hamid Karzai's shaky government or aid the Taliban, Sunni Muslim militants against whom Iran nearly went to war with in 1998. The Taliban obtains the lion's share of its weapons and other aid from the proceeds of opium trafficking and from Sunni supporters in Pakistan and Arab nations.

The recent seizures of Iranian arms by British troops in Afghanistan's war-torn southern Helmand province are challenging that assumption, however.

"Iran appears to be playing a very small role, but it appears to be increasing," said Seth Jones, an expert at the RAND Corp., a research center that's close to the Pentagon.

more...

[LynnTheDem]

1. "Iranian arms to Taliban"??! ROTFLMAO!!!

Oh my GAWD don't tell me ANYONE in the US of A is falling for that incredibly ridiculously stupid shit??!


:rofl:

[babylonsister]

2. Ya see, Rand 'is close' to the Pentagon, who tells them what to say!

And McClatchy is repeating what Rand says. Simple, no? They're building their evidence around their hopes!

[LynnTheDem]

3. It's the "faith-based reality" versus the real reality again.

I notice the media continues to just assumes it's fact.

Being #47 in freedoms of the press is hard werk!