Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rep. Jim McDermott: Obama's Tax Deal Good For Trust Fund Babies, 'Unfair' To The Unemployed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 04:47 PM
Original message
Rep. Jim McDermott: Obama's Tax Deal Good For Trust Fund Babies, 'Unfair' To The Unemployed
Rep. Jim McDermott: Obama's Tax Deal Good For Trust Fund Babies, 'Unfair' To The Unemployed

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/12/jim-mcdermott-tax-cut-deal-unemployment_n_795554.html



Democratic Congressman Jim McDermott (D-Wash) called President Obama's tax cut deal "unfair" on Sunday, during an appearance with fellow Congressman Elijah Cummings (D-MD) on CNN's "State of the Union," and accused the president of not being serious about helping the unemployed.

"If you just take one specific issue to show the unfairness of this, you have two groups of people in this country who do not have jobs," McDermott told host Candy Crowley: "You have trust fund babies and you have the unemployed."

Obama's tax cut deal "gives $68 billion to the trust fund babies with security, it's going to last two years. To the unemployed, he gives $56 billion," McDermott continued. "It's going to go for a year, and then it's sort of up to the Republican-controlled Congress to go into the second year."

"If he were serious about this unemployed, he would have put in two years, he would have demanded that he have two or three years of unemployment, because Bernanke is saying we're going to have high unemployment for the next five years. It's not going away. And any avoidance of that is simply not caring about the unemployed in this country."
Refresh | +10 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Delete
Edited on Sun Dec-12-10 05:00 PM by Lasher
Mighta been a little too quick on the trigger there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Cal Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. People who can afford not to work
because of family investments/wealth.

I knew quite a few of them in college and they even used the term to describe themselves.

Divisive? Sure. There's a hell of a big difference between being unemployed by choice because you can be, and being unemployed because of forces beyond your control while struggling to keep a roof over your head. And there are a hell of a lot more people in the latter category.

But pointing out a truth with some feisty rhetoric is a hell of a lot more tolerable than a pack of lies being spoken politely imo, which is what we get from most politicians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. OK thanks, I was thinking something else.
I self-rescued myself from ignorance with The Google.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC