Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OMG! I just watched Reagan's Budget Director on Colbert,,,,

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-10 01:23 AM
Original message
OMG! I just watched Reagan's Budget Director on Colbert,,,,
and he agrees with US!

He is against the Bush tax cuts for the top 2%. When asked what programs should be cut, he said {b] Defense! He made fun of most Repuke strategies, and basically called them "stupid".

Well, there ya go all Raygun acolytes.

Raygun's own Budget director agrees with Dems and dismisses most Repuke strategies as "stupid".

Every "trickle-down" and Raygun supporter should view Colbert's interview.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-10 01:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. David Stockman?
I read a book by him after his days with reagan. He talked about things they had actually shoved down people's throats with their totally-fucked budgeteering - things like "Rosie Scenario" - where they had everything working, predicated on some fairy story that they hoped might materialize in the future to make it all better based on what they did. It was just all gonna work like some sort of magic. And the "magic asterisk." Whenever they couldn't make the numbers add up (through real-world economic figuring, that is) they inserted a "magic asterisk" that somehow accounted for all the discrepancies and made things add up at the bottom of the ledger page, with NO explanation what the "magic asterisk" stood for, or how much, or where from. UNBELIEVABLE. And everybody was so romanced with reagan and soothed to sleep by his folksy aw-shucks nice old "uncle ronnie" schtick that they let it all happen without a fight.

It was AWFUL!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pa28 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-10 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I read that one too.
It was a really revealing look at the Reagan White House. Stockman would bring folders to Reagan with cuts and finally Stockman said there was nothing left to eliminate.

Reagan said "just keep them coming".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
veganlush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-10 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. sad and telling that this type of information
is on Colbert, instead of somewhere where the tea baggers will see it. This stuff needs to be seen but the other side, not the choir.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-10 06:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. He was on CNN last Sunday
on Fareed Zakaria's program
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bermudat Donating Member (985 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-10 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. If teabaggers were to watch, what makes you believe they will listen?
The facts, the truth means nothing to that lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-10 02:37 AM
Response to Original message
5. Reagan understood some aspects of money.
Edited on Fri Dec-03-10 02:38 AM by truedelphi
This household finally was able to receive child support from the kid's dad. For him, there was no more crossing of state borders to get away from his legal obligation.

Reagan had realized that some 65% plus of all women on AFDC knew the name, address, and job site of the other parental unit. Why make the state pick up the cost of raising a kid? Why have women on welfare, who had to either receive AFDC and not work, or work and have their AFDC cut back by money earned so that filing for welfare wasn't worth it. Why the endless hassles of bureaucrats questioning you about every dollar you got. (I was once put into detention and held for four hours by welfare officials, who at first would not tell me why I was there. Then they wanted to know who had conspired with me to commit fraud "upon the local government." Fraud?!? I had forgotten to report a single five dollar birthday check my folks sent me.)

On account of Reagan, for the first time in my adult life, I had adequate income. And my son had a Platinum Plus health care policy. All paid for by the person who was equally responsible for him, both morally and legally.

Once and a while the father would slip behind in payments, but then would find out his income tax refund was sent to us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Lane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
7. Stockman's book is excellent
And the things he's saying now don't represent some new conversion. Even while he was working for Reagan, he was a true believer in the idea of the Reagan Revolution, but was also smart enough and honest enough to realize as time went on that the administration was on course for record deficits (which is what happened).

His book is The Triumph of Politics. As pa28 said above, it's a revealing look at the Reagan White House, but perhaps even more revealing about Congress. The Republicans all talked very hawkishly about eliminating deficits. Then they fought like tigers to protect their own special interests. For example, Stockman wanted to save billions of dollars by eliminating tobacco subsidies, but Jesse Helms said "No" and that killed that idea. And so it went. Stockman ended up with cuts that were much smaller than were needed to offset the tax cuts, but the tax cuts went ahead anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC