Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bottled Water Has High Environmental Costs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
RestoreGore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 09:16 PM
Original message
Bottled Water Has High Environmental Costs
Bottled Water Has High Environmental Costs

By Deborah Zabarenko, Environment Correspondent

WASHINGTON, May 10 (Reuters) - Bottled water, the world's fastest growing beverage, carries a heavy environmental cost, adding plastic to landfills and putting pressure on natural springs, the author of a new report said on Thursday.

"Bottled water is really expensive, in terms of environmental costs and economically," said Ling Li, who wrote the report for the Washington-based Worldwatch Institute.

While many in developed countries thirst for safety, cleanliness, taste and social cachet when they buy bottled water, more than 1 billion of the world's poorest lack access to clean drinking water, bottled or not.

And in developed countries, bottled water may be scrutinized using lower standards than plain tap water, the report said.

The environmental impact can start at the source, where some local streams and underground aquifers become depleted when there is "excessive withdrawal" for bottled water, according to the report.

In addition to the energy cost of producing, bottling, packaging, storing and shipping bottled water, there is also the environmental cost of the millions of tonnes of oil-derived plastic needed to make the bottles.
End of excerpt.
~~~~~~~~~~
Corporations that sell bottled water are depleting natural resources, inflating prices, and lying when they tell you their water is purer and tastes better than the water that comes out of the tap. And Americans have been the unwitting targets of a grand campaign to make them believe that tap water is always substandard and bottled is always from a pristine flowing stream in the mountains of Maine untouched by man... and the reason for that deception should not be surprising...PROFITS.

In the past ten years the bottled water market has more than doubled in the United States becoming the second most popular beverage behind soda. Three out of four Americans drink bottled water, and spent $10 billion on bottled water last year alone which comes to an average of about 26 gallons per person. That's a lot of environmental degradation and landfill plastic just to have convenience and feel "safe" about a product that for the most part is no different than the water coming out of your tap.

Just as with the tobacco industy and the oil industy, the bottled water industry is spending tens of millions of dollars every year to undermine your confidence in tap water even though the water systems we rely on are better regulated than the bottled water industry. Tap water is regulated by the EPA which has strict guidelines regarding chemicals with testing by government agencies. Bottled water is regulated by the FDA with regulations that only apply to water that is bottled and transported between states. That leaves out a huge chunk of the water transported within states that have no guidelines attached to them with states many times leaving them to self police themselves.

Three companies control more than half the water market presently: Coca-Cola, Pepsi, and Nestle. Both Coke and Pepsi exclusively use tap water for their source while Nestle uses tap water in some brands, and even though they make claims that it is filtered several times with the processes they use it is hardly state of the art and prone to the same dangers as any other product and people are paying dearly for it. These companies harm the environment by depleting underground water sources and damaging stream systems by using affiliate companies to bottle the water for a song as they mark it up exhorbitantly to make a profit. This while people in water scarce countries literally die of thirst. To me, this practice is totally immoral. That is because this misrepresentation about tap water prohibits proper funds from being alloted to update water systems, thus opening the door up to privitization. And that is something people must fight as those in Cochabamaba Bolivia did in 2000 when Bechtel sought to privitize their water.

The first step of course is to have water declared a global human right, and for people to become more aware of just what entity is overseeing their water system. At the frantic pace of population, the excelled pace of resources dwindling including glacier melt that is happening at an accelerated rate globally and drought due to climate change, and the continued wasteful practices of humans, we are headed for a crisis of untold proportions if we do not get a handle on it now. And that also means standing up to those who would dare use this crisis as a way to make a profit from it as people in developing countries dig ever deeper hoping for just one drink a day.

People are being hoodwinked into giving huge amounts of money to an industry that takes advantage of our environment and brings in more profits than the pharmaceutical industry. One hundred billion dollars could have done a lot to bring potable water to the over one billion people in this world now without it and fix the water systems here that need it.

Water is not a commodity it is a human right. It is time those companies exploiting that right know that we are not going to take it anymore.

My other writings on this:

Stand Up To Corporations That Kill

Globalization/Time To Take Action

Who Owns The Water?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. If they take out the flouride waste, then I will drink it.
As it is studies are proving this to be the biggest fraud to the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matsubara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. If you insist on drinking bottled...
...at least please use the big jug on the dispenser - at least that doesn't make all those stupid wasteful little bottles, and the jug is recycled.

Also keep in mind that unlike tap water, bottled water is totally unregulated and there is no guarantee whatsoever of its purity.


Personally, I just filter my tap water and let it sit in a jug for a while before drinking it.


Another big problem with bottled is that it is conditioning people to think of water as a commodity rather than a part of the public commons, which is what it is. This really is something to be concerned about, even if you have qualms with tap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. They added flouride to our water in 2003. The filters are
extremely expensive. When I don buy my house I will install the mega filter that purifies the water for the whole house so I'm not showering in the crap too.

If you look at the history of flouride, you will see that it was used in Russian and Nazi concentration camps because it drugged people into complacency... made them easier to manage. Perhaps, it is why we are slowly being numbed into apathy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undergroundpanther Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 02:42 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I grew up on water
Not connected to a municipal system. It had no fluoride in it but it tasted like crap due to sulfur or some mineral that was harmless but affected the taste.But I noticed I was way more defiant and questioning twords authority than the kids in my school that had the water from the municipal system they seemed unless they were bullies as you said apathetic. I guess thinking back I am glad I was not exposed to fluoridation. My teeth were healthy until I was subjected to braces.I had the train tracks, the braces caused stress fractures in the enamel they even cracked a tooth..So while I had braces I got most the fillings I have now.
However I wish I could afford to get these amalgam fillings outta my teeth.

My sister who did not get braces still has healthy teeth except for one that got banged hard and it and died. sO she has a cap on that one.and I think 1 filling. My other sister who had braces also has a mouth full of fillings.

So much for the dental myth at least for our house.Braces caused more tooth decay for us than the water did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RestoreGore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. And that is how they appeal to the consumer
Edited on Fri May-25-07 10:23 AM by RestoreGore
Tap water is not as flavorful as bottled water, so they appeal to that in order to make a sale by equating that to quality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. Good info thanks.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RestoreGore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Thank you, and this too goes to the core of reasoned debate
Edited on Fri May-25-07 10:45 AM by RestoreGore
This proves we have what we need to solve the global water crisis as well if only greed and waste weren't the main factors keeping it from being solved. Whenever I shop for groceries, I shake my head looking down the soda aisle. An entire side all the way down is stocked full of water of every imaginable flavor, and all I can think about are families in Africa, South America and other places in the world with scarcity that are living in sewerage and drought without the water they need to live and it angers me so much. If consumers are made aware and look to their moral conscience to at least cut down on the amount of bottled water they buy or boycott it completely, it just might make a difference. However, they need that information first in order to make an informed decision, ergo, back we go to the premise of Al Gore's book The Assault On Reason which really hits at the heart of this regarding every issue, especially the environment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC