Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

US Ivory Towers are Built on Foundations - Which are Cracking

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
OlympicBrian Donating Member (456 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 10:28 PM
Original message
US Ivory Towers are Built on Foundations - Which are Cracking
Edited on Sun Nov-21-10 11:12 PM by OlympicBrian
Key points and changes highlighed.

US Ivory Towers are Built on Foundations - Which are Cracking
- A Functional Description of Our System
(original 10/29/2010, Dan, Seattle; updated 11/21/2010 to include various debt commission plans.)

"US corporatocracy" - the system of government that serves the interests of, and is essentially run by, corporations. The term describes neoliberalism in its US operational context, with all its components. It primarily seeks to further ties between government and business--where corporations, multinational corporations, conglomerates, and private parties including political organizations and highly-paid corporate executives are the primary controls, and are the elite. Areas of control rely on direction and governance often tied to contrived (sometimes fearsome) mass-media visages of issues, ideas, and persons within the nation. Within the corporatocracy, objective news reporting is hard to find. The system depends on highly-paid "pundits" for dissemination of major themes--these themes are often repetitive and divisive. Moreover, pundits distract the public from the critical issues, facts, and figures they should be focusing on. Often times these pundits--such as Glenn Beck, with basically a high school education--flat out misrepresent or lie...and millions of Americans are taken in. Thus, the shady activities of the corporatocracy go largely unnoticed.

There is a revolving door between the components of the corporatocracy, including those formally in government and those in business. The system retains the superficial appearance of being a democratic republic, by relying on long-standing faith in the democratic voting, legislative, judicial, and executive processes--but below the surface, it is a system of government without true representation of the people. Make no mistake, it's government serving corporations and money for the elite. Big money.

Major activities of the corporatocracy include carrying out economic planning notwithstanding the "free market" label. Because the major interests served in the system are corporate-related, the general welfare of the nation suffers--the benefits of productivity do not appropriately proliferate. Compensation stagnates, and as share of national income it falls. Taxes "invert" from an original progressive intent, placing a greater burden on everyone but the rich and the ultra-rich. Some ultra-rich individuals and corporations pay relatively low taxes--yet ironically, it is this elite group who are the most highly represented in the corporatocracy.

As a result of the massive disparity in distribution of wealth within the consumer-driven economy of the corporatocracy, demand necessarily relies on easy credit, and/or economic boom/bust cycles. The US Federal Reserve is intimately involved in creating these cycles, but in doing so, has recently run up against a fundamental math barrier (near-zero interest rates); as a response to this, the Federal Reserve has resorted to dangerous, inflation- and bubble- creating measures. Recently, such bubbles have created tensions with the nation's trading partners.

The US Treasury is used as a source of income for the elite, through a series of complex transactions and events which obfuscate where the money is going--but ultimately leave the taxpayer and our children bearing the cost. The corporatocracy distorts basic sciences such as economics; it even presents production of other nations as its own. No objective, macro-economic studies of the impact of major trends such as job offshoring are referenced by the policy makers. Indeed, if any such reports were written, they would be sponsored by the elite. So the corporatocracy protects itself.

As an example of such a self-protecting report--recently, a US "Debt Commission Report" draft plan (the BowlesSimpson) has been announced. While it does seek to cut some waste, this is "political bait" to reel in unwary Americans. It proposes cutbacks on social welfare programs, but it leans heavily upon on the backs of the middle-class, cutting back on popular tax deductions such as the mortgage interest deduction, and increasing the tax on gasoline. Instead of simply nixing the cap on Social Security taxes, to shore up the system--which is largely solvent anyway--it proposes Social Security cutbacks. It also proposes major cuts in government and military spending that will lead to slower growth, particularly since the US has such a high component of military spending; this will not help the economy--it will lower GDP, and lead to higher unemployment.

The corporatocracy makes its influence clear in the Debt Commission plan; it soaks the middle class, but is a windfall for the ultra-rich. While claiming to be a plan to balance the budget, it is nothing of the sort--and the provisions of the plan provide all the clues. The plan actually reduces taxes on the rich and ultra-rich--instead of obvious and painless revenue-generating measures which would help balance the budget. Specifically, the plan does not include reasonable and fair revenue-generating measures, such as increasing the number of upper-end marginal federal income tax brackets, to reflect an ever-widening US income disparity (a measure which would have no negative side effects.) Astoundingly, the plan does not include a financial transactions tax. Such a tax would not only zero-in on the richest stock market gamblers--but it would also help to discourage stock market meltdowns. Stock market meltdowns are costly and devastating! Why is a helpful transactions tax missing from the plan?

Incredibly, besides proposing yet another large corporate tax cut (corporate taxes have already been cut by 11 percent over the last 25 years), the plan also includes a provision to "stop taxing overseas profits of US multinationals," thereby encouraging corporations to focus efforts and capital offshore versus doing the same in the US--this can only hurt US jobs. Yes, you read that right--zero taxes for overseas corporate profits. Taxing profits at a rate of zero percent amounts to pretending a huge tax revenue source doesn't exist, sending the ultra-rich yet another lavish windfall. Taxes should be increased on overseas multionational profits, not decreased--this is a high-growth area. A clear and comprehensive capital gains taxation schedule is also not in the plan (see ** below.) All of these perks are built in for the elite--while you lose your mortgage interest deduction, and Social Security. According to one analysis, adding this all up, only a tiny 6.4 percent of savings in the plan are due to increased general revenue over ten years--despite the fact that there is an obvious huge, wealthy tax base left almost entirely untapped. Another example of serving the elite.

Americans should be outraged--these tax proposals represent a further re-distribution of wealth from Mom and Pop to the ultra-rich and corporate multinationals. The plan is in fact the most egregious joke on the American people in decades. But some might say, the corportocracy itself has been building itself up for decades, and this is just business as usual, from its perspective. Clearly, there is an underlying bias in the plan--towards further enriching the ultra-rich. Remarkably, this bias at the expense of achieving a balanced budget--obviously then, the plan is at utter odds with what its claimed purpose was. This should alarm anyone reading this. (Note 11/21--two more plans have been produced, the Domenici-Rivlin plan, which isn't much better than the first, and another by Rep. Jan Schakowsky, which shows promise, .)

The corporatocracy relies on US and foreign financial influences, channeled anonymously through political organizations. It ensnares the US judicial branch within its overall goals. In fact, the judicial system enhances the finances of the system and protects the corporatocracy, as if it had the same--if not more--rights than the individual, via the Citizens United decision. It does so against the will of 80 percent of the people (a reputable poll was taken.) "Unlimited, anonymous funds" allowable through corporate donations to political organizations result in a huge "multiplier effect" on political speech, given the nature of high-tech, mass-media, and broadcasting--a fact not accounted for in the Citizens United decision.

Communist China provides the underpinnings of cheap production, labor, and credit for the corporatocracy; the US nurtures China via offshoring and investment, without the slightest consideration of the long-term consequences. China is about to surpass the US in industrial production, and they are projected to surpass the US in the area of innovation by 2012. They are moving ahead quickly in the area of advanced manufactured products relative to the US. China has the worlds largest and most advanced high-speed rail system. They are making far larger strategic investments in Africa than the US. China recently announced the worlds fastest supercomputer. Ironically, while China is relied on so heavily by US multinational corporations, the US is on the brink of a trade war with them--one part of the corporatocracy is fighting another (this can't be good.) China is also demonstrating pronounced inflation as an effect of being a primary (though unbalanced) mechanism of the corporatocracy. Finally, while we share our technology secrets with China, they do not hold them in confidence. Yes, our corporations sell out our secrets to communist China.

At the heart of the corporatocracy is a non-elected body, the US Chamber of Commerce. This powerful group, known mainly for its political attack ads, is extremely well-financed through mostly anonymous, sometimes foreign entities. It acts as a major focal point for corporations, with a distinct emphasis on the biggest. The Chamber is growing, becoming increasingly dominant in the corporate, media, political, election, legislative, and judicial spheres. It prefers foreign interests over US citizens, carrying an agenda aimed at offshoring US jobs--and tax breaks to corporations which do so. The Chamber also recently kicked off a campaign to change a law which prevents foreign corrupt practices. Congress acts in lockstep with the Chamber...the President has limited powers...and the US Judicial Branch has been swayed to serve the Chamber (the Chamber brags about its judicial victories.) So the Chamber has a lock-down on the three branches of government. In summary--the big money, influence, and decisions flow through the Chamber and its biggest corporate constituents, while the three branches of US government are merely tools.

Not surprisingly, in the corporatocracy, unemployment is high even during boom periods where corporate profits are rich and the stock market is high, because of a reliance on offshoring and offshore investment. The corporations always seek out what's known in economic terms as "absolute advantage," which in lay terms means "utter selfishness and disregard for the rest of the US." The corporatocracy cares less about retaining jobs than foreign counterparts, largely due to the influence of the US Chamber of Commerce. The US tax base is eroded as a consequence--those that profit the most in the corporatocracy aren't taxed--and the federal debt climbs quickly, since the US budget system relies heavily on non-corporate federal income tax receipts. In short--no jobs means no balanced budget. And yet the Chamber persists in its anti-US-job agenda--and America lets it. Are people protesting the Chamber in the streets, and demanding they desist? I haven't seen them.

As part of its operating model, the corporatocracy generates an increasing number of offshore holding companies, which route US direct investment abroad ("DIA"), first through the EU, and then through yet other entities...finally allowing the widespread propagation of offshored business into low-wage countries like China, India, and Brazil--with low US tax consequences. In addition, the US also offers tax incentives for offshoring--destroying its own tax base. But as for the DIA, up to and throughout the current recession, the rate of growth of DIA in EU holding companies has been brisk. This DIA activity means foreign investment and offshoring has become the "new bubble"--as an alternative to US job creation. It's a bubble because it has disconnected the economic model of capitalism from the welfare and fiscal sustainability of the US.

Through the US Chamber of Commerce's comprehensive approach, the corporatocracy achieves an unprecedented fusion of formerly separate powers not only nationally, but on a world-wide basis--against the fundamental principles of separation of powers upon which America was founded. As scary as this reality is, the Chamber goes much further--not only does the Chamber create attack ads up until elections, but it also spends huge (and now anonymous and unlimited) money after elections. This money goes towards little-publicized, yet important legal cases, and towards spoon-feeding the text of self-benefiting US laws, via the Chamber's lobbying activities. And here, not only is it the biggest influence in the world by far, but foreigners can contribute and influence laws without disclosure. Congress--while elected--is handed many of the critical details of US laws by the non-elected Chamber. Make no mistake, it's government serving corporations and money for the elite. Big money.

Given, this "perfect" system for the elite, the future looks bright, right? Wrong. Some millionaires and billionaires sense trouble ahead, and are recommending progressive federal taxation: and .

This comes as US bond rating agency Moody's warns "extending the Bush tax cuts would be bad for the US credit rating." . The US credit rating is paramount--so we are at a tipping point. And this fact, along with massive, longstanding unemployment and the federal deficit, shows there are cracks forming in the foundations of the elite's ivory towers--and that is what the Corporatocracy neglects at its own risk.

Shows how much the US Chamber of Commerce spends to write your laws:

"The selfish spirit of commerce knows no country, and feels no passion or principle but that of gain."
- Thomas Jefferson to Larkin Smith, 1809.

"Economic theory assumes that capitalists pursuing their individual interests are led to benefit the general welfare of their society by an indivisible hand. But offshoring, or the pursuit of absolute advantage, breaks the connection between the profit motive and the general welfare. The beneficiaries of offshoring are the corporations' shareholders and top executives and the foreign country, the GDP of which rises when its labor is substituted for the corporations' home labor. Every time a corporation offshores its production, it converts domestic GDP into imports. The home economy loses GDP to the foreign country that gains it."
- Paul Craig Roberts, Economist, former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury, former editor and columnnist Wall Street Journal, Businessweek


** Under the tax reform Option 1 in the Debt Commission Report "BowlesSimpson" draft plan (page 24) it states:
"*Note: All options set aside $80 billion for deficit reduction and treat capital gains and dividends as ordinary income."

However, I don't know for sure if they mean "options" on that page (page 24), or tax reform options in the draft! (Notice multiple asterisks on page 24.)

Treating capital gains and dividends as ordinary income is an implicit capital gains taxation schedule. So, I am partially off-base, though literally correct when I state "A clear and comprehensive capital gains taxation schedule is also not in the plan."

My first take is this tax treatment does not apply to tax reform Option 2 nor Option 3, but only to "options" on page 24. Yet another way to read it is they mean tax reform Option 2 and Option 3 DO treat capital gains and dividends as ordinary income, just like Option 1 (and a third source I consulted with believes this.) But if that were the case, I would have thought they would spell this out explicitly for Option 2 and Option 3--instead of hiding this important fact in the Option 1 table (bad writing).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Recommend!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OlympicBrian Donating Member (456 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thanks, there is a lot of supporting data and tables too
For those interested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OlympicBrian Donating Member (456 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
4. Bookmarked and rec'd. Thank you n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OlympicBrian Donating Member (456 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 07:10 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OlympicBrian Donating Member (456 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OlympicBrian Donating Member (456 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. wait, you're K&R'ing your own thread?? LOL, well, that's... different.
Edited on Mon Nov-22-10 11:32 PM by inna
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PufPuf23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. This is an important post about the trajectory of the USA
Neo-liberals are fascists (as are neocons and Germany and Italy and Spain and Argentina and etc at times of the 20th century).

Technology has entered the musings of Orwell and Philip K Dick; example: Citizens United that establishes invisible unlimited CORPORATE - not citizens - political donations where the media is already consolidated and owned by the MIC).

There is an international global economic monarchy risen of the ashes of the New Deal and Marshall Plan and United Nations (which were healing and humane).

The USA tries to dominate the world by violent imperialistic nationalism today even though general welfare of citizens is ignored to absurdity. The USA is a well-armed rogue nation, ever isolated. The global economic monarchists will escape and benefit from our Fall. Much is about over-population, greed, and dimishing / degraded natural resouces

The Democratic Republic called the USA evolved into a facade for a corporate global empire enforced by military and reserve currency. The short term gains by the globalist economic monarchy tactically set the world up for massive population decline by engineered destruction.

The US Chamber of Commerce is a quisling of regional and local business that is selfish and does not consider the future or even how it is a tool of global economic monarchists. Academia is compromised.

Government and Wall Street and G20 economists do not have valid calculations nor have motive to be to be arithmetically realistic. . Why? What is unmentioned is a future substantial drop in human population which may be cruel. Eugenics is policy.

I cannot disagree that population is the biggest issue for sustainability of Earth Eden; however, living humans are taking the brunt of horror rather than "quantitative easing" that threatens the safety or comfort of the globalist economic monarchy and their quislings.

Why else would a society systematically kill the future of so many individuals? The economic policies of the USA are insane for National Security (such a good excuse but true now).

Aside: Posting while inebriated as twisted back cutting firewood today and know tomorrow's pain will be worse.

Second Aside: Economists should be required to study ecology.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OlympicBrian Donating Member (456 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. It's true that global population growth is a big issue...
Ha ha nice inebriated post!

I didn't even begin to factor population growth in as a limiting factor; but then again, neither does the corporatocracy. They simply see "the fastest growing markets" and "the cheapest labor markets" as the places to plunder. There, they can sell the most, and pay the most impoverishing wages. And yes, natural resources abroad are degraded...and back home, given the current US macroeconomic model, the US degrades itself fiscally.

I do have background in biology of all sorts (but not ecology), so I know where you are coming from. And I have a little background in economics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PufPuf23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Thanks for noticing. lol
Edited on Mon Nov-22-10 11:13 PM by PufPuf23
I have name education and professional background in ecology and economics as a fed, wall street corporate financial consultant and government policy consultant, and academic and have dropped out to the rural home of my 8th grade educated father where people still matter and >50% local of population is Indians. I have testified as an ecologist and economist before Congress Committees and as consultant to State taskforce 20 years ago. I live within National Forest one has to cross two Reservations -- one where I graduated high school -- to see a stop light or a corporate chain store. I am sometimes glad to be old, disillusioned, and broken because my end is nearer and I live in beauty and my actual human relations face to face are good.

I am going to jump in the hot tub and relax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OlympicBrian Donating Member (456 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Have a nice bath... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OlympicBrian Donating Member (456 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-10 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. The Green Party already includes the ecological aspects of a situation into a discussion of
Edited on Wed Nov-24-10 05:55 PM by truedelphi
The economy.

Wish our Democratic leaders would do so. I mean, Al Gore pretends he does, but I can only imagine what his response would be to anyone pointing out how many resources the Chemtrail jets are using.

Whereas the Greens n are about stopping the Chemtrail jet program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
11. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Jan 18th 2018, 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC