Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Not looking good for Murkowski

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 07:12 PM
Original message
Not looking good for Murkowski
Acording to local radio, many if not most write-ins are mispelled and bubbles are not filled in..Miller is doing a lot of crowing at the moment..Could change as they have just begun counting, today being the first day, but if it continues on like it has so far today Miller is likely to be the next Senator from Alaska..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mgcgulfcoast Donating Member (202 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. i dont really care
2 repukes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. my general feeling is that if the contest is between two republicans...
...may the least qualified republican win!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Anchorage Daily News disagrees
http://community.adn.com/adn/node/154249

Update, 1:46 p.m. (5:46 p.m. ET)

The first batch of numbers is out and they show 89 percent of the write-ins counted so far were perfect for Lisa Murkowski.

Out of 7,638 write-ins counted just 67 wrote in someone other than Murkowski.

The Division of Elections says 6,804 votes were unchallenged for Murkowski, representing 89.08 percent of ballots counted.

Another 678 of the ballots were challenged but the challenge was overruled by the Division. Those are considered to be "challenged but counted," and will be reviewed in the expected recount with the courts having the final say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Amazing how the stories differ
anyway what you show is a ten percent challenge rate. One hundred thousand votes to be tallied and Lisa is ahead by about 11,000 votes. ten percent of a hundred thousand is ten thousand. Pretty close if you ask me.. I wonder why our local station would put out something as bogus as what you show? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. I did some quick math and if she gets 89% of the 41% of the write ins, she gets 36.5% of the vote
Enough to win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomm2thumbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. exactly - and when someone is questioning *see photo* this



you know someone is crazy, when this is a disputed ballot

Republicans are all motherf**kers when it comes to being on the losing side of an argument

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thats not what I have heard on CNN. Only a fraction of the Murkowski write in's are being thrown out
not enough to keep her out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. In one way, I almost would like to see a Miller victory over Murkowski
Edited on Wed Nov-10-10 07:17 PM by Blue_In_AK
just for the simple fact that I think he will be easier to vote out next time than she would be. I have a feeling that if Murkowski pulls this off, she will be our senator until she dies, and since she's younger than me, that means she'd be senator for the rest of my days. I really don't care much for that thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. Miller's trying to say those misspelled votes are really for him...
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Well, he should know!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie Marie Donating Member (709 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Well, in fairness, I can see his point.
Someone writing "Mercowsky" or "Mircawschy" obviously meant the vote to go to "Miller". Plain as the nose on your face people!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
7. Delete - dupe
Edited on Wed Nov-10-10 07:16 PM by Blue_In_AK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
10. Aw Fuck...I'd rather have that soulless R for the batshit craziness that is Joe Miller
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
13. Wait a minute...
Edited on Wed Nov-10-10 10:52 PM by Liberal_Stalwart71
I thought a judge decided *against* Miller, suggesting that voter intent matters more than correct spelling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
14. If Miller wins,
that's just one more teabagger who won't compromise with the repubs anymore than the Dems. I'm waiting for a fist fight to break out in congress one day. Keep those cameras rolling.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC