Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bipartisanship Didn’t Die, It Never Existed - FDL

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 10:09 PM
Original message
Bipartisanship Didn’t Die, It Never Existed - FDL
Bipartisanship Didn’t Die, It Never Existed
By: David Dayen Friday October 22, 2010 9:21 am

<snip>

The New York Times, October 17, 2010, in an article entitled “The Education of a President”:

Obama expressed optimism to me that he could make common cause with Republicans after the midterm elections. “It may be that regardless of what happens after this election, they feel more responsible,” he said, “either because they didn’t do as well as they anticipated, and so the strategy of just saying no to everything and sitting on the sidelines and throwing bombs didn’t work for them, or they did reasonably well, in which case the American people are going to be looking to them to offer serious proposals and work with me in a serious way.”


Mike Pence, Chair of the House Republican Conference, a senior leader in the Republican caucus of the House of Representatives, October 22, 2010, in a radio interview with Hugh Hewitt:

“Look, the time to go along and get along is over,” said Rep. Mike Pence (Ind.), the chairman of the House Republican Conference. “House Republicans know that. We’ve taken firm and principled stands against their big government plans throughout this Congress, and we’ve got, if the American people will send them, we’ve got a cavalry of men and women headed to Washington, D.C. that are going to stand with us.”

Pence said his party wouldn’t compromise on issues like spending or healthcare reform, two of the weightiest items on Congress’ agenda next year, when the Republicans could control one or both chambers.

“Look, there will be no compromise on stopping runaway spending, deficits and debt. There will be no compromise on repealing Obamacare. There will be no compromise on stopping Democrats from growing government and raising taxes,” Pence told conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt Thursday evening. “And if I haven’t been clear enough yet, let me say again: No compromise.”


I’m amused that Pence thinks there was at one point a “time to go along and get along.” When was that? January 20, 2009, from 9am-3pm?

As if to continue on that theme, Jon Kyl, Minority Whip and second in the Senate Republican leadership, from October 21, 2010 with Hugh Hewitt:

“We had 40 votes, and then 41 votes, the absolute bare minimum needed to prevent the Democrats from passing most of their agenda. And with a couple of exceptions, we succeeded. Every single Republican held tight,” he said. “So we have shown that we can act together in a very strong way. And I just have to think that with greater numbers in the Senate, and potentially taking over the House, we’re just going to be in a much stronger position.”


Basically, the action in the next two years will be in the executive branch federal agencies, all of which will be under constant threat of defunding and harassment from the GOP.

But bipartisanship, in the Congress? Fuhgettaboutit.

<snip>

Link: http://news.firedoglake.com/2010/10/22/bipartisanship-didnt-die-it-never-existed/

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Any time I see an admin rep (or Obama) talk about making nice with Republicans
I will have a mental image of the word "SUCKER!" overlaying their face like an old Warner Bros. cartoon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is the image that the term "bipartisanship" conjures up for me>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. ^ LOL
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unkachuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. for being so politically savvy....
....during the campaign, team Obama, in retrospect, seems to be quite naive....unless there are other forces at work....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC