Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If/When pot is legalized should there be an age requirement like alcohol?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 07:56 AM
Original message
If/When pot is legalized should there be an age requirement like alcohol?
Edited on Fri Oct-15-10 07:57 AM by Toots
Pot was totally legal in Alaska for seventeen years but it was illegal for anyone under nineteen years old. It was also illegal to possess more than four ounces at a time(in your home) and only one ounce in any public area. Funny crime rates also went down dramatically during this period. Is nineteen a good age limit or should it be raised to twenty one like alcohol, or should there be any limit at all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well, I'm really fringe on this issue but
I think all drugs and alcohol should be legal and somewhat without an age limit. I think a person should have to take a class, like a driving class, before receiving a card that allows them access to whatever drugs and/or alcohol they want. I think education makes for better decisions no matter what age. And I want Erowid to run the classes. They lack the usual bias and they have a huge amount of information on just about any drug you might wish to partake of.

I told you I was fringe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
exboyfil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. 18 for everything
If you are old enough to vote and serve in the military, then you are old enough to drink, smoke, and toke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. So a 5yr old can do hard drugs as long as he/she went to a class?
Why not make it 18 and make drug education simply part of school curriculum rather than needing a card to prove you have the privelege of putting substances in your body?

"I told you I was fringe."
At least you warned us. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #7
18. Well, I'm old and yet,
somehow, I'm able to remember that me and my fellow classmates in high school were having sex (many of us without protection because there wasn't sex education in Southern Baptist land), smoking pot and drinking quite a bit. Now, granted the legal drinking age was 18 back then, but I was 14 the first time I got drunk. As an aside, I was astounded at my tenth year high school reunion that as my fellow classmates had become parents, they had suffered an amnesia that I had not and still have not.

Sure you used an absurdity to show the slippery slope. I get it. But, use whatever arbitrary age you feel is appropriate but for goodness sake, be aware that people will do what people will do when they choose to do it. So educate them early and often. Alas, school is now just an endless train for the tests, so unless there are going to be yearly tests on the drugs, teachers aren't going to have the time nor the ability to do that teaching. That however, is a whole other kettle of worms having nothing to do with this discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonLP24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Well said
Sounds a lot like my youth except for the sex part(had none).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. Well said. I took drugs for years and the illegality didn't stop me for a second. I'm
very strong about the education -- and GOOD education rather than just scare tactics. Which we never believed anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #22
29. Exactly!
After I had an early pregnancy scare, I made it my business to self educate and I extended that to pot and alcohol and I became the go to girl for the right information. I hope I helped a few people not make the mistakes I made, but on the other hand, teenage brains are not adult brains and with that immortality belief that comes with that age bracket, who knows?

I recently read a study that purported that the human brain isn't fully developed until around age 25, so if we're going for arbitrary numbers, there's one that might make sense though it won't stop anyone younger. Those limits rarely do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. I've always felt any of those substances should be legal for 18 yr. olds.
If you're old enough to die for your country in an illegal war, you're old enough to choose to get seriously hammered and live a little.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
4. 18 all around - old enough to fight and die, old enough to drink and toke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uncommon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
5. Yes. I think either 18 or 21 would be reasonable. I really would rather people
smoke weed than drink.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
6. When you're old enough to be sent to war you're old enough for everything
Edited on Fri Oct-15-10 08:09 AM by lunatica
included in that everything is the right to vote, to drink, and to smoke legal pot. If the government deems you old enough to fight it's useless wars for the world's resources then it should consider you old enough to make your own decisions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. lets reset the age to be sent to war to 30
18 to join the military, but no war-zone assignments until age 30
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #12
19. Fucking awesome idea!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
littlewolf Donating Member (920 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uben Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
8. Pot should be free to anyone over 55
Guess how old I am?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #8
25. That should be in the Party's Platform.
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
9. 18 and at the same time alcohol legal age should be 18 too.
If 18 is the age of majority one should have all rights and responsibilities at that age.

If one can sign an enforceable contract at age 18, get married at age 18, die in a foreign war at age 18, be sentenced as an adult at age 18 then he/she should be able to drink or smoke at age 18.

All >18 restrictions are IMHO Unconstitutional (equal protection under the law and all that). I would even go so far as to include age restrictions on political office. It is merely reverse ageism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
10. A lot of kids are still in high school at eighteen
I think the bottom line should be nineteen. alaska used to have the drinking age at eighteen but the first Bush put so much pressure upon every state with a low drinking age that it was changed to twenty one. There was however an incredible amount of evidence that more accidents happened with children under twenty one that drank alcohol and drove...In fact it was because of such a tremendous amount of evidence that every state followed suit and raised the drinking age.. Not sure Pot is anywhere close to alcohol but I do not want my grand kids smoking pot at least until they get out of high school..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #10
21. I already said this in another post, but I suppose it bears repeating
Whatever you may want for your grandkids, remember your own growing up. Did you really wait until it was "legal" to do _______________? If you did, then kudos, but you're an anomaly. If your grandkids know you want to believe that they will be innocent, whatever that means, until after high school, I promise they'll give you that illusion if they love you as much as I loved my grandparents (who raised me actually). But the odds that they are giving you the real scoop, is, well, no better than it was in my generation and likely even less.

Amnesia, in these areas, serves none of us, especially those kids we treasure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
11. I would say it should be 21, like alcohol, unless you have a prescription from a doctor. n/t
Edited on Fri Oct-15-10 08:21 AM by Ian David


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
13. Why not start them out at 2 or 3
Seriously, 21 just like alcohol. Yes 18 is a legal adult, but many 18 - 20 year olds are not mature enough to handle things like alcohol or marijuana.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #13
23. Then maybe age of legal majority needs to be raised to 21.
So someone isn't mature enough to drink but they are mature enough to die in foreign war, sign a horrible binding financial contract, or get make a lifelong commitment in marriage?

The reality is there are some 25 year olds, 40 year olds, hell 90 years olds not "mature" (which you really mean responsible) enough to drink or smoke.

If 18 is the age of majority isn't it reverse ageism to deny people some right while imposing some responsibilities on them (being charged as a adult, getting drafted, entering into binding contracts).

So to those who say people shouldn't be able to drink from age 18-21 I saw they shouldn't be able to do anything then (vote, own property, sign contract, get married, go to war, etc).

Either make age of majority 21 or treat 18 year olds as an adult.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonLP24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
15. 18
Cannabis is nowhere near as harmful and strong as alcohol so I think it is ridiculous to make it 21 like alcohol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
16. Same age as alcohol..
you don't want to give the enemies of legalization any more ammo than necessary..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
17. 21. -eom-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Regret My New Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
24. I think it should be 12...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
26. 18 is fine, 21 for puritans
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
27. I have no problem with creating similiar laws with both age requirements and driving under influence
I think it's about time our country legalizes it (although I've never done the stuff I've never had issues with it). My biggest worry is about an influx of people who will be driving while stoned. Sure, I can almost guarentee a bunch of DUers will post how they drove while stoned and trust me, I can share with you stories about how I managed to drive a car home while totally intoxicated (nothing I'm proud of but done it enough times - stupidity in my 20s). Just because a few people might be able to drive while under influence and get away with it doesn't mean the rest of the US population will have the same luck. If people cause car accidents and are found to be under the influence of pot, I would expect they receive the same treatment as if someone were drunk.

Point is this, when it comes to driving, we should do everything we can to pay attention to the road and put stuff away that can distract us from driving safely - that includes drinking alcohol, smoking pot, other drugs and even things like texting, chatting on the cell phone, putting on makeup, etc. etc.

As for age - I think 18 is a good cut-off point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonLP24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #27
30. I agree
but one thing is, alcohol intoxicates you much more than cannabis can but you can probably drink 2-3 beers without going over the .08 limit. Also they're varying degrees of punishment as when you're .15 then the punishments get really severe so when it comes to drinking, the law is flexible. Today when it comes to cannabis, just having it in your blood stream is evidence of driving while high when you smoked yesterday but drove today. Alcohol can cause you to become dizzy, stumble when you walk when I never lost my balance walking on cannabis. I'm not saying you should be allowed to drive while high, I'm saying some studies should be done to determine what is reasonable. Like I said you can drink a little bit and drive, as long as you're not over the .08 and alcohol does impair you much more than cannabis does. Also they need to figure out a way to properly evaluate if someone is currently high and how high they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
28. 18 for marijuana and alcohol, imo n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
31. Yes - 21
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
32. I think both should be 18. In the meantime, yes, keep the same laws as alcohol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
astral Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
33. It's not true that it was 'totally legal' in Alaska
It was just that the Alaska Constitution was strongly written like the US Constitution and it was taken kind of seriously, i.e., not 'a goddamned piece of paper.'

But it was not a real big deal to be caught with it. It was never legal to buy it or sell it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
34. Prop 19 is for 21 and older. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC