Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ABC NEWS: Right now, DADT is dead

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 06:41 PM
Original message
ABC NEWS: Right now, DADT is dead
Edited on Thu Oct-14-10 06:53 PM by ruggerson
The administration has filed for a stay, but until Judge Phillips grants it, the Pentagon is officially halting any discharges.

They are obeying the Court order.

So, for a few hours, or a few days, we have achieved equal status in the military.

And Judge Virginia Phillips will go down in the history books as a change agent of monumental import.

Thank you, your Honor.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/dont-pentagon-halts-enforcement-justice-department-appeals-stay/story?id=11870635
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. And when Congress repeals DADT because of President Obama's efforts, that'll be a permanent CHANGE.
Edited on Thu Oct-14-10 06:53 PM by ClarkUSA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. President Obama's efforts? Such as his current efforts to appeal the ruling?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Really? So President Obama works for the Justice Department, too? Wow.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Correct me but DOJ is part of the executive
And POTUS leads it?

Or did I got my civics wrong...

Jesus this is like basic and shtuff...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #16
26. The Justice Dep't.'s orderly defenses of laws passed by Congress is constitutionally sound.
That's not my opinion, that's a "basic" fact that any good "civics" class teaches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. And the executive can chose not to file
A challenge. Most of the time they do, but it is their choice, or the President could ask Holder not to. It's happened, albeit rarely, in the past. Politically this is an easy out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. This is not about "an easy out". Walter Dellinger on the Rachel Maddow Show is making this case.
Edited on Thu Oct-14-10 08:29 PM by ClarkUSA
Dellinger was Clinton's Acting Solicitor General. He's saying that it's wrong to allow a single district judge to overturn a law passed by Congress. He gave an example of a future Republican president finding one district judge to rule against HCR and deciding not to appeal. He also said that President Obama has done alot to move the repeal of DADT forward by making the military get on board, which is a big deal. Dellinger said that ultimately, Congress really needs to repeal DADT but that President Obama is doing a "delicate" dance to set the stage for that to happen.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #29
36. The pres is doing a "delicate dance", and people's careers are being destroyed.
He could stop all prosecution, but he chooses not to. Delicate dance my ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #26
35. LOL you logic needs help. Yes the DOJ can choose to defend laws passed by Congress but they dont
have to. Especially if it appears that the FUCKING LAW IS UN-FUCKING CONSTITUTIONAL. Why doesnt the Pres do some thing? Tell us why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #11
33. That is no defense. That is no argument. That is no evidence. That's a question.
That's how Faux News works. Insinuation via question. What has the pres done to end DADT?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
27. Pres. Obama has nothing to do with DADT not being repealed. Blame GOP obstructionism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #27
37. So you say he is a powerless president with no influence? He can stop prosecution today. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. The Court already beat him to it
Edited on Thu Oct-14-10 06:59 PM by nadinbrzezinski
And if they were less stubborn...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
30. You do realize that refusal to appeal would have resulted in permanent change, don't you?
All they had to do was decline to appeal. The law is gone. Forever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #30
40. He is in denial. Doesnt want to think that the Pres mite not want DADT repealed. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
32. The Pres has none absolutely nothing to end DADT. He could have stopped
prosecution on day one of his administration, but no, thousands have suffered. To date he has done nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Touchdown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
34. The word your looking for is Despite.
Just being helpful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
41. Congress has already turned down that opportunity.
If it couldn't happen with a majority of Dems, it isn't going to happen with fewer Dems. Unless you have the same faith-based belief the president appears to have, in the inate goodness of Republicans which only needs to be given a chance to surface and which will occur only if we all continue to believe in it.

He can do it now, but he clearly doesn't view as all that important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. and, for the first time, inaction on obamas part would actually be a good thing.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Blame GOP obstructionism. Pres. Obama has nothing to do with DADT not being repealed.
Edited on Thu Oct-14-10 06:54 PM by ClarkUSA
Quite the opposite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. that's right. and all he has to do is continue to have nothing to do w/ DADT
by letting the court ruling stand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Why did Gates send a letter to Congress asking them NOT to repeal it this year?
Ya think he was goin' rogue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
38. But he has the power to stop prosecution. He is the CIC. But he hasnt. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #6
42. Wrong, he has the authority to
issue an EO, and would be on firm legal grounds to do so. There is simply no excuse anymore. That authority has been established and the public is behind it. The Republicans have nothing to do with this, they can be rolled over easily and legally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lamp_shade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. OH SHIT! I just hit unrec by mistake. So sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. that's all right we all know there are people here who are disappointed that the law is dead for now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
LonePirate Donating Member (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Obama may be President; but he certainly has not been a leader when it comes to repealing DADT
Then there is complete lack of leadership on repealing DOMA or passing ENDA. "Lacking" is a generous word to use to describe Obama's leadership on LGBT issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Are you suggesting that the same progress could have been made with McCain/Palin
in office? Since Obama has obviously done nothing in your eyes, correct?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Do you think Judge Phillips would have ruled differently?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #22
31. Do you think Judge Phillips would have ruled differently?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. No biggie
I canceled out your unrec
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lamp_shade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Thanks.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. No worries; I compensated for that. (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
15. In other words, though it seems that what he's doing is counterproductive
would it be fair to say that Obama's strategy will make the difference between DADT being dead and being, shall we say, dead and gone?

:shrug:
rocktivity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. If he didn't appeal it, it would be dead AND gone
there would be no one else with standing to appeal and no other court could take a new case, because the law would already be dead.

Only way it could rise again would be if COngress reinstated it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Okay then. If DADT is dead and gone and Obama WANTS it dead and gone
Edited on Thu Oct-14-10 07:22 PM by rocktivity
and he has the power to stop the appeal -- WHY is he appealing?

:headbang:
rocktivity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. You're not the only one who wants the answer to that question
Even the New York Times today called for him NOT to appeal it and let the law die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #15
39. What strategy? People's careers have been ruined during his term. He can do something but hasnt.nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
21. Thank you, Judge Phillips. You produce change I can believe in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
25. Rachel will decode this as well
He should order DOJ not to file.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
43. It's like the end of a horror movie when you think they've killed the bad guy.
But then he opens his eyes and takes one more swing. DADT looks gone but we need to deal that final death blow to make sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC