Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The reasons I am not a Republican...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 09:06 AM
Original message
The reasons I am not a Republican...


I do not wish to defend the Big Banks or Wall Street. I prefer to defend the folks on Main Street.

I do not wish to defend capital gains tax cuts or dividends. I prefer that taxes on labor be equally respected.

I do not wish to expand the military industries or to defend the wars in Iraq or Afghanistan. I prefer our monies be spent elsewhere.

I do not wish to see our teachers attacked. I do not wish to see our unions bad-mouthed.

Those are a few reasons I am not a Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sonomak Donating Member (147 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. I thought you'd have to qualify
A high income or low IQ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. You put it more reasonably than I would have.
The reason I am not a Republican:

THEY SUCK!

THEY SUCK!

THEY SUCK, SUCK, SU-U-U-U-U-UCK!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I like your sigline.
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
4. Two reasons: I'm not selfish & I'm not stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
5. John Boehner. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bryn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
6. Here are the reasons I'm not a Republican


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
7. What horribly antiquated values! You certainly are tilting at windmills!
You're not seriously expecting political representation are you?

You're just a crazy extremist!

Do you want president Palin?!?!?!

Looking for a pony?

Those values are only shared by a teeny tiny eensy weensy itsy bitsy little minority of non-real Americans!

Why do you hate America?

***

There Kentuck, I think I covered it all so that when Cassius and Brutus show up to defend their character they'll already have some ideas to branch off of so they can attack you with their usual candor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrcheerful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
8. Gee I would have put the reasons as
1) I have more then 1 brain cell working

2) I hate being told what to do

3) I don't follow well and couldn't lock step marching orders

4) I don't vote against my best interests thinking that by voting for tax breaks for the rich will make me rich someday, R's trickle down economics was a bad ideal in 1929 and they are still a bad ideal in 2010

5) Republicons smell funny
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happyslug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
9. In response, Grant's 1880 "I am a Republican" Speech
IN view of the known character of the speaker who is to address you to-day, and his long public career, and association with the leading statesmen of this country for the past twenty years, it would not be becoming in me to detain you with many remarks of my own. But it may be proper for me to account to you on the first occasion of my presiding at political meetings for the faith that is in me.

I am a Republican, as the two great political parties are now divided, because the Republican party is a national party seeking the greatest good for the greatest number of citizens. There is not a precinct in this vast nation where a Democrat can not cast his ballot and have it counted as cast. No matter what the prominence of the opposite party, he can proclaim his political opinions, even if he is only one among a thousand, without fear and without proscription on account of his opinions. There are fourteen States, and localities in some other States, where Republicans have not this privilege. This is one reason why I am a Republican.

But I am a Republican for many other reasons. The Republican party assures protection to life and property, the public credit, and the payment of the debts of the government, State, county, or municipality, so far as it can control. The Democratic party does no promise this; if it does, it has broken its promises to the extent of hundreds of millions, as many Northern Democrats can testify to their sorrow. I am a Republican, as between the existing parties, because it fosters the production of the field and farm, and of manufactories, and it encourages the general education of the poor as well as the rich.

The Democratic party discourages all these when in absolute power. The Republican party is a party of progress, and of liberty toward its opponents. It encourages the poor to strive to better their children, to enable them to compete successfully with their more fortunate associates, and, in fine, it secures an entire equality before the law of every citizen, no matter what his race, nationality, or previous condition. It tolerates no privileged class. Every one has the opportunity to make himself all he is capable of.

Ladies and gentlemen, do you believe this can be truthfully said in the greater part of fourteen of the States of this Union to-day which the Democratic party control absolutely? The Republican party is a party of principles; the same principles prevailing wherever it has a foothold.

The Democratic party is united in but one thing, and that is in getting control of the government in all its branches. It is for internal improvement at the expense of the government in one section and against this in another. It favors repudiation of solemn obligations in one section and honest payment of its debts in another, where public opinion will not tolerate any other view. It favors fiat money in one place and good money in another. Finally, it favors the pooling of all issues not favored by the Republicans, to the end that it may secure the one principle upon which the party is a most harmonious unit--namely, getting control of the government in all its branches.

I have been in some part of every State lately in rebellion within the last year. I was most hospitably received at every place where I stopped. My receptions were not by the Union class alone, but by all classes, without distinction. I had a free talk with many who were against me in war, and who have been against the Republican party ever since. They were, in all instances, reasonable men, judging by what they said. I believed then, and believe now, that they sincerely want a break-up in this "Solid South" political condition. They see that it is to their pecuniary interest, as well as to their happiness, that there should be harmony and confidence between all sections. They want to break away from the slavery which binds them to a party name. They want a pretext that enough of them can unite upon to make it respectable. Once started, the Solid South will go as Kukluxism did before, as is so admirably told by Judge Tourgee in his "Fool's Errand." When the break comes, those who start it will be astonished to find how many of their friends have been in favor of it for a long time, and have only been waiting to see some one take the lead. This desirable solution can only be attained by the defeat, and continued defeat, of the Democratic party as now constituted.


This was called by William Jennings Bryan one of the ten greatest speeches between 1865 and 1905
List of what Bryan called the Greatest Speeches 1865-1905:
http://www.bartleby.com/268/

This actual Speech:
http://www.bartleby.com/268/10/13.html
http://www.nationalcenter.org/USGrant.html

Think about this speech, it is true as to the Democratic Party today as it was when Grant spoke the above about the GOP.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC