Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fly Fishers (shoes) Serving as Transports for Noxious Little Invaders

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 08:22 PM
Original message
Fly Fishers (shoes) Serving as Transports for Noxious Little Invaders
Fly Fishers Serving as Transports for Noxious Little Invaders

By FELICITY BARRINGER
Published: August 15, 2010

Didymo in the Gihon River. Native to British Columbia, the microorganism has been found as far away as New Zealand.

Blame their boots — or, more precisely, their felt soles. Growing scientific evidence suggests that felt, which helps anglers stay upright on slick rocks, is also a vehicle for noxious microorganisms that hitchhike to new places and disrupt freshwater ecosystems.

That is why Alaska and Vermont recently approved bans on felt-soled boots and Maryland plans to do so soon.

“If you were trying to design a material to transport microscopic material around,” said Jack Williams, an expert on invasive species with the environmental group Trout Unlimited, “felt on the bottom of someone’s boots in a stream would be as close to perfection as you could find.”

The response among fishermen threatened with the loss of soles that cling to slippery rocks parallels the five stages of grief.

There is denial (the science is wrong), anger (why should I fall on my tail for the good of the planet?), bargaining (I will wash them, I will disinfect them, I will dry them), depression (I cannot afford new boots) and, finally, acceptance (I will go feltless if I must).

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/16/science/earth/16felt.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. I totally disagree with that comment.
Edited on Mon Aug-16-10 08:41 PM by RandomThoughts
I do not choose to think of acceptance as some stage, and only accept what I think should be. And do not plan on changing that.

So any post on people accepting things, depends on the individual, not some formula thought to be the same for everyone.


I won't accept what I do not accept. And accept what I think is better, And anything unacceptable is the same, so it does not matter until things are acceptable.

And currently there are things in my personal life that I do not accept, so things will change.


And I post that anytime someone says something silly like people have to accept things in some form because of some pattern.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC