Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FDA: Chemical dispersants used in gulf oil spill don't hurt seafood safety

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 06:05 PM
Original message
FDA: Chemical dispersants used in gulf oil spill don't hurt seafood safety
from the Wash Post..

Chemical dispersants sprayed into the Gulf of Mexico to break up the massive oil spill from the Deepwater Horizon disaster do not appear to threaten the safety of seafood in the affected waters, the Food and Drug Administration said this week.

In a letter sent in response to questions from Rep. Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.), the agency responsible for ensuring the safety of seafood said that chemicals used to break up the slicks are not as dangerous to human health as the oil itself.

FDA scientists do not believe that the chemicals accumulate significantly in the tissue of fish and shellfish, and so, even if the fish absorb the chemicals through gills or other ways, the fish do not retain them, Jeanne Ireland, FDA's assistant commissioner for legislation, wrote to Markey. That means they do not pass up the food chain to humans and are not considered a public health concern, according to the FDA.

more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/08/06/AR2010080603185.html

This is very good news but I suspect the gloom and doomers wont believe it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is science? Where is the science?
To know the full effects of a chemical on animal and plant life, you need to examine the affected animals and plant life for YEARS!

It has been a little over 100 days since the Spill occurred.

This is junk science, but then that Monsanto Clone, Mike Taylor, heads the FDA, thanks to Obama needing to be allied with every Big Industry out there. (And who in American Industry is bigger than Monsanto?)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Click your heels 3 times and you're home!
Edited on Fri Aug-06-10 06:11 PM by HCE SuiGeneris
Hurrah for the omniscient FDA! We should all just "believe"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sorry, I don't trust the FDA. Have they TESTED the seafood? Sounds like they're just
basing this on conjecture.

Remember, the FDA, like most U.S. regulatory agencies, waits until there is a problem and THEN decides to investigate. Then, if you're lucky, you might be able to win a lawsuit when you become sick from something they SAID was safe. Or not, like the 9/11 responders - so much for the advice of the EPA on that one.

Probably still full of Bush appointees and being influenced by BP propagandists.

Guess I'm a gloom and doomer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Desertrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Sure they tested it...they gave it the "smell test"....


Cause the EPA said so!

Don't you feel safer now? Well heck, I know I sure do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. Same people who approved aspartame...
...I'm sure they'd never steer us wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. Alternatively
The FDA announces that the chemical soup in the gulf has polluted all seafood.

None of it will be safe to eat for decades.

But the FDA did drop their "Don't eat too much fish because of" their mercury advisory.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
7. Let's invite then to dinner down here, and see how they really feel.
Edited on Fri Aug-06-10 07:41 PM by dixiegrrrrl
Sounds like they need a dose of real Southern hospitality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lib2DaBone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. Chemicals are GOOD for you... eat your oil sludge.....
you don't want to be called a "doom and gloomer".... do you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Curmudgeoness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
9. Gloom and doomer checking in here.
If you feel safe eating seafood from the gulf right now, or in the near future, go for it. I am hoping I am wrong if you do decide to eat it. I am not that trusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. not sure I would want to eat it now either but that does not mean FDA is wrong.
FDA cant test every fish, crab, shrimp, etc. and who knows what unknown effects these contaminants might cause. I think it will take some time before we can be sure all Gulf seafood is safe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Curmudgeoness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. On the other hand, it does not mean FDA is right. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. What bugs me is that many people mindlessly dismiss anything positive about this situation.
and immediately assume its a BP paid for conspiracy and lie. That's an absurb reaction.. imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Curmudgeoness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. We all really would like to have good news, and believe it.
But this situation begs for questions. When you think of all the chemicals in that water, you are best to be cautious.

I will however concede that there are areas on the gulf coast that have not been affected by the spill and chemical use. And the seafood from those areas probably are still safe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. agreed. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
10. According to my astrologer, gulf seafood contains dangerous amounts of DHM.
Apparently those bastards at NOAA are big shills for the DHM industry.

Well sir, I ain't having no chemicals in my food.

It's straight laetrile and collodial silver for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
11. gloom & doomer wants to see the science... nt
Edited on Fri Aug-06-10 09:36 PM by G_j
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I doubt it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. you cant handle the science.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. and is there a purpose
to your tag team attack?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. no need to tag team you..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. OK
you obviously are implying that I am anti-science in some way.
Got an example?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. I did assume that but perhaps I am wrong.
I have no examples.. just a knee-jerk reaction to your post.. most comments like yours do belong to people who are anti-science.. imo. Sorry if Im wrong in your case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. I asked the same question earlier in the week
Edited on Fri Aug-06-10 10:20 PM by G_j
where is the report the EPA cited in it's findings?
I'm not a scientist, but I'd like to at least see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. I dont know but it should be available somewhere.. its a govt report and it should be public record.
I will try to find it and post it if I locate it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
18. Oh, I believe the FDA will say what they need to say.
That doesn't make me a gloom and doomer. That makes me someone who can learn from experience. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
19. You eat it then!
:9

I trust the FDA on this about as far as I trust the MMS to regulate oil drilling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
22. well of course...I mean, it's basically soap, and soap is good for your health
hell, you're supposed to wash your food...this is just, like, your food being washed from the inside...it's probably actually healthier than eating nasty, unwashed food! Those stupid doom and gloomers need to get with the program and stop worrying about anything...they need to go buy some shit or something, and relax. Watch some TV. Don't worry about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
25. Woohoo! Shrimp Cocktails for everyone at the FDA!
What? They're refusing delivery?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
29. The FDA is worthless.
The FDA turns a blind eye on high levels of lead in fruit juice, melamine in food products from China --yet-- they feel the need to "protect us" from pharmaceuticals made in Canada.

The FDA needs to regain a little more credibility before I will trust ANYTHING they say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC