Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Someone tell Chris Matthews that newspapers used to routinely publish birth notices.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 06:20 PM
Original message
Someone tell Chris Matthews that newspapers used to routinely publish birth notices.
They quit doing it sometime in the last 10 years or so because hospitals would no longer release birth information following some kidnappings of newborns.

Why does he keep associating this with social prominence?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. because big city papers likely did only print announcements of socially prominant babies
like they only do socially priminant weddings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 06:26 PM
Original message
Right, all births were announced in smaller community newspapers but most major newspapers
didn't want to waste the space accounting for every child.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. In Minneapolis there were daily birth announcements
in very small print up through the 1980s, I think.

I think they were still there when I left Minneapolis in 1984, but they were gone by the time I came back in 2003.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Thus "most." I think for some newspapers it was something well received by readers
and important just like the marriage announcements and obits.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. the local papers here publish birth announcements
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yup, they listed them all the time
Since probably before Bengi Franklin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Curmudgeoness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. Our paper lists them too. But you have to pay in the big city
papers. So it is a socially prominent issue if you are not in BFE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
7. Tweety should talk to a Hawaii old-timer. Honolulu was a small city by Mainland standards...
Anyway, I thought it was standard practice to publish "vital statistics" for free. Nothing fancy, mind you-- you had to pay for a real obituary, write-up of the wedding, or birth announcement with cute pic. But the basic info about births, marriages, and deaths were obtained by the newspaper staff from the County Clerk-Recorder or equivalent official, and published in one column.

The whole "social prominence" thing goes back a long, long way, to the days when a girl's debut was a big deal. :eyes: We're talking rich white girls here, not a quinceneara for a Mexican-American teen. The newspaper's social columnist would attend the functions of the well-off and prominent in whatever town it was and give them a flattering write-up, mentioning details like the menu and who wore what. Like Chelsea Clinton's wedding.

The young Obamas were university students and their parents were not prominent. If they'd actually had an engagement instead of a quick marriage, there might have been a little article simply because Obama Sr. had already been written up as the first African student at UH. As it was, the marriage was quiet and the baby's birth announcement was published the same as everybody else born that week.

Tweety, Tweety, Tweety. Well, at least he's defending the President from the insane Birthers.

Hekate


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC