Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Most annoying political myths of all time--LIST YOURS

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 06:09 PM
Original message
Most annoying political myths of all time--LIST YOURS
Edited on Sat May-12-07 06:10 PM by Adenoid_Hynkel
1. Clinton only won in 1992 because of Perot
--not true, before Perot re-entered the race that fall, Clinton was beating Bush by an even wider margin. All Perot did was tighten the race up by drawing from both candidates. This meme was created to paint Clinton as an illegitimate president. It stuns me how often even people on the Democratic side repeat this one.

2. The Dems didn't let Gov. Casey speak at the 1992 convention because he was anti-choice.
--Not true. One of the most often repeated, but Casey was barred because he wouldn't endorse the ticket.

3.The Wellstone "fune-rally"
--do we even need to go into this one?

4. Air America pays stations to carry it's programming.
--Not true. Often repeated by O'Reilly, which is odd considering he had to pay stations to launch his radio show. I write about media criticism and it's amazing how many rightwingers throw this one at me.

5. Nader is a secret Republican
---This one is just fucking stupid.

6. Liberals want "activist judges"
--When it's conservatives who have created thinktanks like the Federalist Society for the sole purpose of getting their agenda through the Supreme Court

What are some of the ones that annoy you the most?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. Tax cuts do more for ave middle class workers than everything else.
A 'puke politico can be a blood-soaked baby-eating corporate whore with oil in his veins - but if he promises to CUT TAXES! Joe Republican will always vote for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. Soros is the most evil man on the earth
somehow no one ever suggests to O'Lielly et al that conservatives have a few billionaires in their pockets.
the haircut that held up the airport during rush hour.
the $400.00 haircut
the destruction done/not to the WH when the Clintons left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. can't believe i forgot the white house vandalism
Edited on Sat May-12-07 06:27 PM by Adenoid_Hynkel
that's one i still hear cited as 'fact' by rightwingers i know
FOX repeated that one 24/7 for a month and never bothered to issue a retraction
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. DU represents the base of the Democratic Party
a local myth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
50. People who believe that REALLY need to work on more actual Dem campaigns.
Or, you know, ANY actual Dem campaigns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreatCaesarsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. ronald reagan single-handedly defeated the soviet union
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ithacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
32. I'm with you on this one!!
It is absolutely unbelievable how many people actually believe this. Which of course means they know nothing at all about the Soviet Union, but rather are basing their views on right-wing and US main stream media propaganda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hyphenate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #32
58. I tend to give more credence
to Gorbachov and Yeltsin for their work on the Russian end to help cripple the USSR, as it was largely their philosophies which helped eradicate the repression to the point where freedom was a possibility.

I also give Samantha Smith more credit for helping to melt the Iron Curtain than Raygun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #5
111. That lie drives me nuts too....
...a complete and total re-write of history in order to prop up a doddering old fool...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seasat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. Trickle down tax cuts.
I think that trickle on would be a better term. The ridiculous Repug notion that cutting taxes would increase investment and raise workers salaries was completely disproven when Clinton raised the top rates and wages for the bottom 60% increased.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otherlander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
57. Didn't Goldwater believe in that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Venus Dog Donating Member (419 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. The votes have been counted and re-counted and in some areas, re-counted again
Repeated over and over in 2000/Florida and again in 2004/Ohio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
8. GW is charming
Gag me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I never understood the "likeablility" claim either
The first time I really saw Bush(I had a passing familiarity with him prior to 99-2000) was during the early part of the campaign. I remember that press conference perfectly. I was struck at his arrogance and how he acted like he was so entitled to the GOP nimination. He reminded me of every spoiled, frat boy brat I had to attend college with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. He's always arrogant, angry
or clueless. Where's the charm in any of those? He was "branded" with the likablity thing by the corporate media to get him into office. I really think it was because there was nothing else even remotely positive about him that they could try to sell to the public. Likablity is subjective, and no one could prove they were lying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. if someone's truly likeable, we don't need to be reminded
and told every 10 minutes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. Dontcha wanta sit down and have a beer with him??
:puke: he'd prolly stiff you with the tab too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. I guess there's something wrong with me
I don't like to drink with empty-headed loud mouthed jerks. I'm weird that way.:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #15
128. Well... he *does* drive me to drink.
Not sure I should be around the president when I'm feeling uninhibiited, however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atommom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #8
108. I recently heard a quote from someone who knew him growing up.
He said GW wouldn't play if his friends wouldn't let him win... he'd just walk off and deprive them of his presence. When asked how GW could get away with that, the friend said "he was just so pleasant and easy-going..." :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #108
120. Sounds like the same circular logic being used to
sell him to us by the corporate media. How is such behavior pleasant and easy going?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atommom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #120
150. Well, it must be, because everybody says he's pleasant and easygoing,
Edited on Tue May-15-07 06:58 PM by atommom
so that makes whatever he does amusing and lovable.

(I don't really need the :sarcasm: , right?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
10. #. Impeachment can't happen and isn't worth trying.
#. Kucinich is un-electable.
#. Democrats should focus on fence-sitting "moderates" to win an election.
#. Democrats need to be bi-partisan to win.

Maybe the last two are the same, I don't know. They're all certainly related.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
11. Universal health care = socialized medicine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
12. Nader won Bush the Whitehouse.
Oh wait, that one's true...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Tee-hee!
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Never mind the 50,000 votes that were stolen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deutsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #14
105. And the tens of thousands of American citizens who were disenfranchised
by Bush's brother.

Just a coincidence, I guess. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Ouch, you picked that scab again!!...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelly Rupert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #12
63. The word is "myth," not "fact."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
16. Democrats are weak on defense.
And how many ground wars have the republicans won? Grenada?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
18. If we leave Iraq, the terrorists will follow us home..n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #18
46. Or a related corollary: if we leave Iraq, it'll be "bad" for the Dems.
Especially in the long run. History will favor the neo-cons on this one, doncha know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
live love laugh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
19. Dean screamed. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-13-07 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #19
95. That's mine too
:P

Were you there? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bronyraurus Donating Member (871 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #95
117. Dean didn't scream?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #117
124. Not really, no
Sorry to disappoint.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bronyraurus Donating Member (871 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #124
131. So what was that footage
that I heard with my own ears?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #131
132. Try this on for size:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bronyraurus Donating Member (871 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #132
133. Great argument
So a crappy recording of the Dean scream means that it didn't happen? You can still hear it, even over the crowd noise that's obscuring it.

Are you arguing that the networks retooled the audio to play up the scream? They didn't. I saw the speech live, I heard the scream, and I thought to myself: "ha, that's gonna be sampled by someone." And, of course, it was. It just made Dean look silly, just like Dukakis looked silly in the tank, just like GWHB looked silly not knowing what a grocery store scanner was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 05:40 AM
Response to Reply #133
142. That "crappy" recording is the accurate sound...
If everyone in the room is hollering, it doesn't sound "silly" for you to be hollering too. If the microphone is right next to your mouth and doesn't pick up the crowd... THEN you sound deranged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bronyraurus Donating Member (871 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #142
143. Come on
I don't think that Dean was deranged, or unhinged, I just think that he was silly. It was a silly sound that his mouth made. The fact that other people were shouting doesn't make it any less silly. The reason why it was such a big deal is because it was so easily parodied and sampled, and because presidential candidates so rarely scream like banshees.

Deaniacs, let it go. You can't blame the media for this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #133
144. I'm saying that context is everything
And removal of the crowd noise removes the context that his speech was given in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bronyraurus Donating Member (871 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #144
145. The crowd noise wasn't "removed"
You're making it sound like the news altered the recording. It didn't. Again, I saw it live, and heard the scream loud and clear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #133
147. ABC News admitted that they were using mics that filtered out background noise
I thought this was common knowledge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
21. The Clinton Administration was the most corrupt ever.
When in fact, the Reagan administration has that distinction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellst0nev0ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
23. Al Gore Sez He Invented The Internets
with his own bare hands :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. not to mention love story, love canal, etc.
the 2000 campaign was the most error-filled in coverage by the corporate media in history
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rusty_parts2001 Donating Member (728 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
24. McCain is a straight talking "maverick".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #24
41. Sigh. That pic can't be publicized enough. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
25. We should "trust" politicians.
Democracy was built on the idea of NOT trusting politicians or other "leaders".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maestro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
28. Repukes like small government.
or Repukes do not tax you like those tax and spend liberals. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
29. Democrats can't win the white house without the south.
Bull-Shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelly Rupert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #29
70. No, but they'd at least need the interior west
and midwest. We certainly can't win with just the Gore/Kerry states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-13-07 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #70
82. if gore had gotten nevada- he'd have won without needing florida
and without any "southern" states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
30. "Politics is boring" - gets me every time.
Politics is CENTRAL to each of our lives, it is a fascinating and vibrant dance.... I effects each of our lives a thousand fold more than NASCAR, NFL, NHL, NBA.....blah blah blah COMBINED.

The RW's success at turning politics into a boring drone is their greatest triumph.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #30
149. I hate that one too, and when people act like they are above discussing
such things - like it's some sort of virture - I remember one guy who bragged to me that he never voted. He actually boasted of it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beausoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
31. The grown-ups are in charge!
Unbelievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
33. John Kerry didn't "fight back" against the Swift Boat Veterans for "Truth."
Edited on Sat May-12-07 09:05 PM by BlueIris
Whenever I hear anyone spewing that, I want to throw things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
34. "Reagan won in a landslide"
The truth is 1/2 the American voters DID NOT VOTE.

:wtf: :evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelly Rupert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #34
65. It was still a landslide.
Edited on Sat May-12-07 10:51 PM by Kelly Rupert
The only Americans with voices are those who choose to speak. And I'm sorry, but any way you slice it,



is a landslide. Reagan was a crap president, but he won his election and re-election more than convincingly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #65
77. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Kelly Rupert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-13-07 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #77
83. I don't like the man who won.
He was the most damaging President we've had, Bush excepted, in the last hundred years. But to deny that he won both elections convincingly is just that--denial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-13-07 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #83
90. Being "convinced" by Reagan is "just that -- denial."
:thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelly Rupert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-13-07 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #90
93. Okay, fine. Reagan actually lost both times.
It was Diebold. The electoral map showing a wholly-blue nation was not a landslide. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #93
119. Yes! Mondale SHOULD NOT HAVE CONCEDED!

He should have demanded recounts in every state (except for Minnesota).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bronyraurus Donating Member (871 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #90
116. What in God's name could
your point possibly be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
35. The Clinton Era economy was only strong because of Reagan's efforts.
Edited on Sat May-12-07 09:03 PM by BlueIris
Clinton got credit for Ronnie's "brilliant" economic revitalization! Clinton lied about his economic acumen, too!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Runner up: presidents don't "really" influence the conditions or directions of the economy.
At least, "not that much."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #36
48. also, it was the GOP Congress that gave us surpluses
funny how they disappeared when we got a GOP president
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #48
51. A Republican President AND AND a Republican Congress
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avrdream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 04:55 AM
Response to Reply #35
139. And the corollary:
The economy is "bad" now because of Clinton decisions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
37. "Reaganomics worked"
More of an economic myth than a political one. At least it would be, if it wasn't being pushed by the Republican party and its paid shills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
38. Why is it stupid to say that Nader is a secret Republican?
It kinda gives him the benefit of the doubt. It makes him evil instead of just an egotistical fu$%ing moron.

Either way, I hope he burns in hell!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
39. John Roberts is a reasonable, even-tempered jurist. More moderate than conservative.
Edited on Sat May-12-07 09:20 PM by BlueIris
ROBERTS IS BUSH'S WHORE.

LITERALLY.

He's an empty shirt put on the Court to take orders from fascists and his actions have just as much potential to effect their extremist agendas as Scalia or Alito's.

Some posters here might not believe this, but even after the woman-killing so-called "partial-birth" abortion ban Roberts voted for, I know Democrats who are STILL trying to tell me that Roberts "isn't that bad."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
40. Dems are more angry than Republicans
the whole "you are just Bush haters" nonsense. Yeah, I'm pretty pissed at him but we didn't make a cottage industry which included launching a cable news station and spending his full 8 years in office (and a $70 million investigation) with the sole aim of impeaching him. We're the angry ones?

That we hate religious people (we DO hate intolerant religious people).

Vince Foster was murdered.

Hillary is a lesbian.

Bill is gay (ok, not a wide spread myth).

Whitewater.

Dems hate America.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. I love that "Hillary is a lesbian" myth. It's so hillariously unbelievable it makes even ME cackle.
And I don't enjoy defending Senator Clinton anymore, even against outrageous lies. But that one is just...SHUT UP, MORANS. I mean, what year do you think this is, 1971? You don't just look ridiculous pushing that meme, you look desperate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matsubara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #43
104. Or the Hillary is a liberal/socialist/feminazi myths.
She is none of those things, She is a careerist, with just a whiff of conscience, which makes her considerably better than most repukes, who have none.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
42. Daley stole the 1960 election for Kennedy in Cook County.
First of all, Kennedy would have still won without Illinois. Some Republicans of course allege that the Johnson machine also stole Texas for Kennedy with just as much evidence as the theft of Illinois in Cook County - that is, precious little. No investigations at the time or scholarly studies since have turned up any credible evidence of the theft of either Texas or Illinois, let alone both. The other part of this political myth is that Nixon decided not to pursue the fraud issue for the good of the country. This is hogwash also. Anyone who has studied Nixon at all knows that he was for what was good for Nixon first. If he had any credible evidence of fraud, he would have pursued it. And the truth is that while Nixon did concede the day after the election, the GOP actually did challenge the results in not just Texas and Illinois, but also in nine other states. Nothing came of any of the challenges.






















Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. AAAAAAAHHHHHHH.
!@#&$%*@(!!!**%&@^!!!

Most obnoxious myth ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #44
115. ...especially when paired with "Get over it!" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #115
121. What those "get over it" people do. not. fucking. GET. is that it was NIXON
who was illegaling up the vote tally in Cook County and other counties in Illinois.

I hate the "get over it" people most when they bring up the election of 1960, I really do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #42
62. An article from Salon - 11/10/2000
http://archive.salon.com/politics/feature/2000/11/10/nixon/">The fallacy of Nixon's graceful exit

In Illinois, for instance, the final recount showed that Nixon's votes had been undercounted by 943 -- yet, in 40 percent of the rechecked precincts, it turned out that Nixon's vote had been overcounted.

It is true that Nixon did quickly concede the election to Kennedy. And while he was careful not to put a public imprimatur on the concerted Republican effort to challenge the election results, he privately not only authorized it, but actively encouraged it.

The Republicans obtained recounts, involved U.S. Attorneys and the FBI, and even impaneled grand juries in their quest to get a different election result. A slew of lawsuits were filed by Republicans, and unsuccessful appeals to state election commissions routinely followed. However, all their efforts failed to uncover any significant wrongdoing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
45. The 9/11 Commission Report
The Warren Commission Report

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
47. Younger voters didn't support Kerry in '04.
Edited on Sat May-12-07 09:48 PM by BlueIris
Especially annoying when it is followed by, "Well, not in greater numbers than they supported Clinton in '92."

SHUT. IT. LEARN TO READ. READ ABOUT HOW MANY MORE MILLIONS AND MILLIONS OF PEOPLE VOTED FOR JOHN KERRY IN 2004 THAN THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA WANTS YOU TO BELIEVE. MANY OF THEM WERE UNDER 25.

IGNORANCE KILLS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelly Rupert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #47
66. But still, if they had voted with the same proportion
that older demographics did, Kerry would be President now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #66
71. Yes, with allllll that support Kerry had from the media, the Party and
so-called progressives. Yep, woulda been a cake-walk into the Oval for the senator.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelly Rupert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #71
72. So, he would have lost,
despite having a final vote total greater than Bush...because treasonous elements within the Party would have backstabbed him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #72
73. Hon, this thread is for DEBUNKING propaganda.
You're in the wrong place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelly Rupert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #73
75. So which is propaganda here?
1. If 18-29-year-old voters, who supported Kerry 55-45, had voted in the same proportion as 45-59-year-olds, Kerry would have had about three million more votes, easily carrying him into the White House.

2. No, because the Party, treasonous "progressives," and the Media would have backstabbed him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 05:11 AM
Response to Reply #75
141. #2
It's apparently much easier to swallow for some. :+
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
49. This is turning into one of the best threads ever!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnieBW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
52. Bush Won the Election in 2000
Edited on Sat May-12-07 10:17 PM by AnnieBW
And all of those little old Jewish ladies in Palm Beach County really did vote for Buchanan!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
53. All north eastern politicians are elitists! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maine_raptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
54. That G.H.W.Bush had anything to do with the JFK Assassination.
Sorry folks, but the facts don't support that myth.

He wasn't in Dallas that day, he was in Huston.

Now Nixon on the other hand...........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otherlander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #54
59. Nixon couldn't have been involved in the assassination.
After all, JFK is dead, isn't he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maine_raptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #59
61. Nixon knew that LHO was a commie defector back from the USSR
PRIOR to that information becoming public knowledge later that day.

And yes, the man is dead.

I'll add one other "political myth" to this too...........LHO shot JFK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
55. "Nuking Japan saved millions of American lives"
"Democrats are soft on defense"

Both are myths.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelly Rupert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #55
68. Well, the second is a myth.
The first is an opinion that is entirely defensible, but which is certainly not airtight. It's too easy to denounce a past hypothetical as a "myth."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hyphenate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
56. That Ronnie Raygun is the most sainted president
to ever come along, and is almost as mighty as the second coming. Any statement that praises Ronnie is a lie, myth or legend that needs to be debunked!

On the other hand, I like Ron Jr. Helluva guy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zippy890 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #56
112. this one really bugs me - that Reagan was a great president

He did more to undermine the advances in civil rights, union rights
and economic justice in this country than anyone up to that point.

He ushered in an era of 'selfishness is good for the economy'/ who cares
about low-income and disabled, and his busting of the air traffic controllers
union strike was horrible. not to mention Iran -contra scandal.

The way he has been canonized as such a great president sickens me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
60. "Vietnam was the Democrats' war." nt
Edited on Sat May-12-07 10:37 PM by BlueIris
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelly Rupert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #60
67. So...whose war was it?
Was it the Republicans, who were not in control of the White House or the Congress?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maine_raptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #67
74. Ike's
Ike started the ball rolling by supporting the French attempt to keep Vietnam a colony after WWII. We (the US) supplied 80% of the French effort. At the height the Battle of Dien Bien Phu, Ike convened a meeting in the White House to discuss the possible use of tactical nuclear weapons to support the French forces trapped there. The plan was nixed by the Senate Majority Leader at the time - Lyndon Johnson of Texas.

Which reminds me of yet another annoying political myth:

After JFK's death, LBJ just continued JFK's Vietnam policy.

Kennedy was looking for a way out. In Oct of 63, he had decided to start the pullout of troops with 1000 being withdrawn by end of that year. On Sunday, November 24, 1963, LBJ signed an Executive Order reversing that decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelly Rupert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #74
76. Advisors and aid are not the same
as the war we ended up fighting. That war was LBJ's baby all the way, and a Democratic Congress went along for the ride.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maine_raptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #76
79. You asked , "Who's war was it?"
So to find the answer you have to look at the beginnings, not the outcome (massive combat operations).

When the French pulled out of Vietnam in the mid-fifties, it was as part ot the Geneva Accords. Included in that agreement was a splitting of the country into two parts; North and South. Also in that deal was the call for general elections in both halves to decide who the leader would be. The US supported the South and the Diem family, but it was clear well prior to those elections that Ho Chi Min would win with about 80% of the popular vote. So Ike canceled the elections in the South and the Viet Ming (aka Viet Cong) fought it. Thus the advisers and aid. And with that came a commitment that lead to "the war we ended up fighting".

One other point:

You have to remember the context in which this all happened - The Cold War was at it's height. For ANY politician of either party to vote against funds to fight the Cold War was political suicide. The Vietnam War during it's early stages (1950-63) was at the most a side show. Things did not really heat up until after that point, but even then, that Cold War imperative was mighty strong, alive, and kicking. It was not until 1968, the Tet Offensive, that the worm changed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelly Rupert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-13-07 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #79
84. Claiming that Vietnam is Ike's war is a bit like claiming
Edited on Sun May-13-07 12:33 AM by Kelly Rupert
that Iraq is Clinton's war, because Clinton both engaged in low-level military support of UN resolutions and no-fly zones, and issued the regime-change policy statement. The Iraq War proper began with the IWR, and the Vietnam War proper began with the Gulf of Tonkin resolution. Advisors and aid are in no way the same as full combat operations--one is foreign military aid, and one is a war. Ike provided aid. LBJ, a Democrat, provided a war, with a Democratic congress giving him the go-ahead.

Yes, the decision was made under extreme political duress. Of course, as the Pentagon Papers made abundantly clear, the duress was largely the creation of the administration. (Again, this defense works equally well for the Iraq war--after all, voting against supporting America and fighting terrorism was political suicide a year after 9/11, wasn't it? Doesn't change the fact that it was a harmful, stupid war that needs to be pinned to the man who led America into it.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maine_raptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-13-07 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #84
86. I never claimed Vietnam was LBJ's war.
It was Ike's, he's the SOB that started it.

As for the advisors vs. soldiers thing; Does it make a difference WHAT you are called at the time you are killed?

LBJ was trapped into that same Cold War imperative that JFK was seeking to escape at the time of his death. The historical record, including the Pentagon Papers, is quite clear on that point.

Yes, LBJ escalated IKe's commitment via his phony Gulf of Tonkin act, but the fact remains that had Ike NOT made that commitment (cancellation of the election, support for the Diem regime, etc.) then there WOULD NOT have been a Gulf incident, and therefore no Vietnam War as you define it.

Also, don't forget that the Gulf of Tonkin incident happened in the middle of a presidential campaign (1964) in which the biggest issue was who would be "tougher on communism".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelly Rupert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-13-07 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #86
87. Good point, I meant to say Ike
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 02:06 AM
Response to Reply #74
134. This is all true...
But it becomes a matter of historical rhetoric less than an accurate descriptor of the what occured...

I, like wikipedia, prefer the Indochina War model that paints the "Vietnam War" as less of an exclusive event and more as the product of Cold War politics meeting a national liberation movement.

The First Indochina War (called the French War in Vietnam) began in the wake of World War II and lasted until the French defeat in 1954. After a long campaign of resistance Viet Minh forces had claimed a victory after Japanese and Vichy French forces surrendered in the North at the end of World War II. During World War II, the South was temporarily occupied by the British forces, who restored French Republic colonial control. The communist/nationalist Viet Minh, whom the Allies had supported during the war, continued fighting the French with support from China and the USSR, ultimately driving the French out of Indochina.

The Second Indochina War (called the Vietnam War in the West and the American War in Vietnam) began as a conflict between the United States-backed South Vietnamese government and its opponents, both the South Vietnamese-based National Liberation Front and the Communist North. It began in the late 1950s and lasted until 1975. The United States, which supported France in the first war, backed the South Vietnam government in opposition to the National Liberation Front and the Communist-allied North. The North benefited from military and financial support from China and the Soviet Union, members of the Communist bloc.

The Cambodian-Vietnamese War followed the Second Indochina War, with Vietnam invading Cambodia and deposing the democidal Khmer Rouge regime.

The Third Indochina War (called the Sino-Vietnamese War) was a short war fought in February-March 1979 between the People's Republic of China and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. The Chinese invaded Vietnam as punishment for the Vietnamese invasion of Cambodia, and withdrew a month later.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Indochina_War

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
64. There is a "liberal media" that doesn't give the RW a chance
to rebut allegations.

Virtually the entire radio spectrum on broadcast is RW ideology, and the Press has given bush a long leash...MSM...gimme a break.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelly Rupert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
69. Impeachment would be an appropriate use of Congress's time. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
78. the continued denial over global climate change
the continued denial over our invasion of iraq having anything to do with oil

the blaming of "political correctness" whenever some racist/sexist/homophobic jackass gets reprimanded or thrown off the air

and of course, "America is a christian nation!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelly Rupert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-13-07 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #78
85. Certainly on the Global Climate Change.
Failure to recognize it as real and man-made is flying in the face of 99% of climatologists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
agincourt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
80. Conservatives are patriots who are just a little mislead.
No, they are lying brown-nosing fascists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #80
123. You are my new favorite poster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
81. The State is your friend.
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-13-07 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
88. Carter failed to free the Iranian hostages, so Reagan had to do
it instead.

For me, this one goes hand in hand with the "Reagan brought down the Soviet Union" crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
legerdemain Donating Member (17 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-13-07 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
89. A Democratic President is bad for the Stock Market
Historically the market has performed much more favorably when a Democrat is in the White House
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-13-07 01:45 AM
Response to Original message
91. 'Ronald Reagan won the Cold War'
:rofl:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nick at Noon Donating Member (100 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-13-07 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
92. Reagan got the government off our backs
Actually he got the government off the backs of Big Business. 
 Since then -- Big Business had been at the throats of the
American consumer. 
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-13-07 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
94. The Dean scream
x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
96. Oh, lots of them...
Edited on Mon May-14-07 08:13 AM by LeftishBrit
Thatcherism was the medicine that Britain needed, and is what other countries such as France also need (to this day, the right-wing journalists are full of that sort of crap!)

The only reason why more working-class people don't go to university (here in the UK) is because evil elitist lecturers are discriminating against them (coming from a government that has been making university increasingly unaffordable to all but the reasonably well-off).

Britain has experienced an enormous increase in population due to all those evil immigrants (it hasn't!)

All bad things that happen internationally are the fault of the 'Islamo-Fascists', the 'Zionists', or some other scapegoat, instead of being the responsibility of their perpetrators.

Blair is a Socialist (hahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!)

Iraq had some direct responsibility for 9/11.

Iraq had WMD.

Those from minority ethnic groups/ descendants of immigrants/ Jews/ Moslems are likely to be less loyal to their country than others. A variant is to blame obnoxious behaviour or bad judgment by a minority-group member on their having 'divided loyalties' whereas a majority-group member would simply be regarded as wrong or criminal.

The Bible orders people to be politically conservative.








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
97. Socialists want to steal your hard-earned money. Greens only care about the environment. n/t
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
98. Elective Partial Brith Abortion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #98
122. Runner up: the idea that the term "partial 'birth' abortion" is valid.
Edited on Mon May-14-07 08:47 PM by BlueIris
As opposed to a misogynist slur created by the Republican hate-machine to generate ignorance, bigotry, and woman-killing "health" policies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
regularguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
99. That the "founding fathers" were biblical literalists,
similar to the fundies of today. So laughably wrong it doesn't even merit comment, yet it drives me crazy that people still try to assert it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
100. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
101. That the media is liberal. If that was the case...
then why does it constantly denigrate people like Michael Moore and Dennis Kucinich?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #101
102. Or broadcast even a HINT of economic bad news during a Repuke presidency?
Or bring people on the air calling for more domestic spying?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jakefrep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
103. God was kicked out of public school nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deutsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
106. Reagan won the Cold War n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matsubara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
107. Bush is "likeable" "down-to-earth" "manly"
I've seen no evidence that he is any of those things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matsubara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #107
109. "Bush Sr. was a little out of touch, but basically a kindly old gent"
Edited on Mon May-14-07 08:59 AM by Matsubara
The fact that he is an arms-dealing spymaster who was probably the de facto president from about 1981 on seems lost on a lot of people.

He's the American Putin, but with a very convincing grandfatherly facade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avrdream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 05:01 AM
Response to Reply #107
140. I think I'll go spew now....
with the thought that Bush is manly. Ick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
110. Obama is not ready for prime time or not electable
The electable one is just stupid and funny at the same time. he is very strong against repubs and has low negs.
also, there are several chapters of repub. for obama and indies for obama. People like him.

Not ready annoys me when he spent 8 years in the Illinois state senate as well as his time in the US.
Dumb.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
113. that there is such a thing as "liberal media"
deregulation is good for consumers

that there is such a thing as a "free market"

that privatization is more efficient or responsive to people than government

that repukes are "pro-military"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
114. Rudy Giuliani, hero of 9/11
wtf did he do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tyler Durden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
118. One of MY faves: "Al Gore says he invented the internet."
I want take people that say that, hook them up to our biggest server and GOOGLE them to death.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
125. John Edwards is likable, but not effective.
Edited on Mon May-14-07 08:56 PM by BlueIris
John Edwards is a courageous, shrewd, skilled statesman who never gets enough credit for his many gifts. What I appreciate most about him is the effort he has made to shed light on the problems Bush and his administration have created for the world and America's standing in the world, particularly economically. Few other Democrats have the guts to put the focus on the big picture for fear of looking unpatriotic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
126. Liberal Media.
total bullshit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
127. Martin Van Buren only became Vice President because of the Peggy Eaton affair!
Blatent Whig propaganda, trying to disparage the Magician of Kinderhook's tremendous political talents.

Justice for Martin Van Buren!!
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
129. Gov. Blanco never formally requested Federal assistance after Katrina.
Debunked. Not exactly shouted from the rooftops (ouch) by the M$M, but debunked nonetheless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mb7588a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
130. Questioning the Iraq policy is not supporting the troops. nt
Edited on Mon May-14-07 09:38 PM by mb7588a
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 02:09 AM
Response to Original message
135. Truman Lost China - Totally False
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 02:13 AM
Response to Original message
136. Republicans are bad people, and Evangelicals are hateful maniacs.
The best man I've ever known was a rock-ribbed Republican. All I know about loyalty, morality, integrity and the crafting of argument came from him.

The best woman I've ever known was a deep-South Evangelical literalist, i.e. every word in the Bible is literally true. She was kindness personified, generous beyond measure, full of love and compassion, and if she had a hateful bone in her body, her faith made sure it never saw daylight.

Mostly, though, I don't like generalizations. Generally. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 04:48 AM
Response to Original message
137. Al Gore ran a "bad" campaign in 2000.
Edited on Tue May-15-07 04:49 AM by BlueIris
Even I bought that one for a while (don't flame; I eventually read real information about Gore and figured it out). That myth is pervasive. I've even met Dems who are not fans of either Kerry or Edwards or the Kerry/Edwards campaign who've expressed more dislike for Gore's tactics than those of Kerry/Edwards/Cahill. Which makes no sense. There was nothing wrong with the way Gore campaigned. NOTHING.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 04:54 AM
Response to Original message
138. Gay marriage will be the end of the world.
Yea, cause Mass. has fallen into the ocean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SallyMander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
146. The scientific community "debates" global warming...
Ranks right up there with "intelligent design" having any scientific validity...

Now i'm off on my biologist tangent, but it also ticks me off when people say that "evolution is only a theory" -- scientific illiteracy is rampant in this country. Most people have no idea what the word "theory" means in a scientific context, that you are working on rejecting null hypotheses, and never "proving" anything. Grrr.

Sorry... back to my grading... :crazy:

~Sally
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
148. "Reagan won the Cold War."
Whenever I hear this I reply with:

"The 'Cold War' was won by countless American patriots like my Dad. He served in WWII and, as a lieutenant, helped to stem the tide of communism while stationed on a US naval vessel off the coast of Korea when Reagan was making 'Bedtime for Bonzo.'"



That usually shuts them up...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
151. That the French rolled over to Hitler and the U.S. did all the heavy lifting in WWII
When the fact is that France went to war when Poland was attacked and bravely took on Hitler while the USA did nothing whatsoever for nearly two years!

In fact, the Russians had already contained most of the Nazi Army before we hit Normandy.

And, while I'm at it, after George Washington had lost battle after battle, the French came along to defeat the British and give us our "victory" and "liberty".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC