Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Meet Obama's New Recess Appointment Dr. Berwick! (Let The Right Wing Wailing Commence!!)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 09:49 AM
Original message
Meet Obama's New Recess Appointment Dr. Berwick! (Let The Right Wing Wailing Commence!!)
Edited on Wed Jul-07-10 09:50 AM by Beetwasher
Administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). This is a HUGE position especially in context of the new laws and regulations. Remember, HCR is brand new, the regulations and how the programs will be handled are going to be molded by the people Obama's appoints to these positions. They will shape these programs and leave their imprint on how they are run for a long time.

Dr. Berwick:

"You could have protected the wealthy and the well, instead of recognizing that sick people tend to be poorer and that poor people tend to be sicker and that any health care funding plan that is just, equitable, civilized and humane must, MUST redistribute wealth from the richer among us to the poorer and the less fortunate. Excellent health care is, by definition, redistributional."<25>

--snip--

"I freely admit to extremism in my opinion of what patient-centered care ought to mean. I find the extremism in a specific location: my own heart. I fear to become a patient. Partly, that fear comes from what I know about technical hazards and lack of reliability in care. But errors and unreliability are not the main reasons that I fear that inevitable day on which I will become a patient. For, in fighting them, I am aligned with the good hearts and fine skills of my technical caregivers, and I can use my own wit to stand guard against them.

What chills my bones is indignity. It is the loss of influence on what happens to me. It is the image of myself in a hospital gown, homogenized, anonymous, powerless, no longer myself. It is the sound of a young nurse calling me, "Donald," which is a name I never use—it’s "Don," or, for him or her, "Dr. Berwick." It is the voice of the doctor saying, "We think...," instead of, "I think...," and thereby placing that small verbal wedge between himself as a person and myself as a person. It is the clerk who tells my wife to leave my room, or me to leave hers, without asking if we want to be apart. Last month, a close friend called a clinic for her mammogram report and was told, "You have to come here; we don’t give that information out on the telephone." She said, "It’s OK, you can tell me." They said, "No, we can’t do that." Of course, they "can" do that. They choose not to, and their choice trumps hers: period. That’s what scares me: to be made helpless before my time, to be made ignorant when I want to know, to be made to sit when I wish to stand, to be alone when I need to hold my wife’s hand, to eat what I do not wish to eat, to be named what I do not wish to be named, to be told when I wish to be asked, to be awoken when I wish to sleep.

Call it patient-centeredness, but, I suggest, this is the core: it is that property of care that welcomes me to assert my humanity and my individuality. If we be healers, then I suggest that that is not a route to the point; it is the point."

http://content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/content/full/28/4/w555

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you for your courage.
Edited on Wed Jul-07-10 10:04 AM by librechik
oh and BTW, thx for firing MacChrystal, too. I am much reassured. However, we need to get out of Afghanistan, stop being so flaccid in that issue, please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greybnk48 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. WOW! This could be very important for the future
of medicine in the US indeed. How exciting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. If this characterization turns to be accurate, Yay! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. How Would His Own Words Be An Inaccurate Characterization?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. As we just saw over the weekend (Jefferson the corporate warrior),
"their own words" can be made meaningless, even contrary to their position.

Additionally, "Ignore what they say, watch what they do" is sage advice that becomes more important every day.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. He's Not A Politician, He's A Doctor
This guy has dedicated his whole life to helping people. I already know what I need to know, but you continue with your cynicism. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. I think you missed the point. You do know that Jefferson was not pro-corporation, right?
As I said at the start, potentially very good, we'll see how he does, or is allowed to do.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. No, I Got The Point, You Enjoy Flinging Cynical Loads Of Crap
The guy is a great pick and there is nothing to suggest he won't do an awesome job.

But feel free to keep up with your cynical nonsense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. How very civil of you.
A cautious agreement is somehow twisted in your mind into "Cynical Loads Of Crap".
:rofl:
Good luck with that and what a great way to bring others into the discussion.

Oh wait, you don't want discussion do you? (wasn't there another poster here that used to capitalize every word in his subject?)
:eyes:

Buh-Bye.:hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Cautious Agreement Or Insinuation?
Edited on Wed Jul-07-10 01:02 PM by Beetwasher
You're not cautiously agreeing, you're insinuating that the guy might be full of shit and might somehow become (or be forced to become) something other than what the evidence of his entire professional career suggests he is.

It's just a nasty, unwarranted and completely egregious insinuation and you know damn well it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
4. K & R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samrock Donating Member (501 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
5. Great!! Do more of these...
George W Bush did this 173 times!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lillypaddle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
6. Great news
now watch the freepers' heads explode!

:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
8. Oh, the right wing are already wailing about this
I read this a few minutes ago.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) on Tuesday blasted the White House for its plan to sidestep Congress in appointing Donald Berwick to lead Medicare.

“As if shoving a trillion-dollar government takeover of healthcare down the throat of a disapproving American public wasn't enough, apparently the Obama administration intends to arrogantly circumvent the American people yet again by recess-appointing one of the most prominent advocates of rationed healthcare to implement their national plan," McConnell said in a statement.

McConnell criticized Democrats for not holding a confirmation hearing for Berwick, and suggested the party was trying to avoid tough questions about the healthcare reform law.

"Democrats haven't scheduled so much as a committee hearing for Donald Berwick, but the mere possibility of allowing the American people the opportunity to hear what he intends to do with their healthcare is evidently reason enough for this administration to sneak him through without public scrutiny."

<snip>

Republican Sens. John Barrasso (Wyo), Pat Roberts (Kan.) and Tom Coburn (Okla.) have led the movement to block Berwick's appointment — with the blessing of GOP leaders. That entrenched opposition would have made it extremely difficult for Democrats to rally the 60 votes needed to push Berwick through the Senate.

Recognizing the impasse — and still stinging from the loss of Dawn Johnsen, a Justice Department nominee who removed herself from consideration in April in the face of unyielding GOP opposition — the White House on Tuesday night announced that it would appoint Berwick without Congress's input. With the new health reform law in need of implementation, White House communications director Dan Pfeiffer said, someone needs to be at the helm of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), which has been without a permanent chief since 2006.

http://thehill.com/blogs/healthwatch/health-reform-implementation/107417-mcconnell-berwick-recess-appointment-is-truly-outrageous



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. not
to be taken lightly

no time now to dig it up, but Obama admin has been relying on a flawed Dartmouth U study to cast a critical eye at medical centers who devote a lot of resources to caring for all, including sick elderly

big article in ny times several months ago.....

focusing on ucla medical center, one target of admin's criticism.....

at ucla, drs go to great lengths to save lives of all, including elderly

darthmouth study essentially said: this wastes money

however: dartmouth used flawed methodology: they only looked at elderly who died after expensive treatment, not those who lived.....

i hope this appt doesn't mean major cuts to medicare, harsher criteria, etc.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. "no time now to dig it up..."
Uh huh, but it still doesn't stop you from throwing out unsubstantiated bullshit.

"i hope this appt doesn't mean major cuts to medicare, harsher criteria, etc....."

What a load of unmitigated crap. Yeah, because this guy is just the type of guy to implement that:

"You could have protected the wealthy and the well, instead of recognizing that sick people tend to be poorer and that poor people tend to be sicker and that any health care funding plan that is just, equitable, civilized and humane must, MUST redistribute wealth from the richer among us to the poorer and the less fortunate. Excellent health care is, by definition, redistributional."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. Right Wingnut Chickenhawks whining about the 'death panel' with Berwick
Rush DraftDodger Limbaugh was whining about it this morning on the radio, heard him while driving about on errands. The Great DraftDodger was 'claiming' that this appointment means the fabled 'Death Panels' are back in the plan...

Right after they unearth the Birf Certificate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
druidity33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
9. has he ever
advocated for a Single Payer system?

That would make me cheer.


But what if he thinks the best way to a "patient-centered" Medicare is by privatizing portions of it?

:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. What If He's Really An Alien?
Holy shit, is there anything you won't complain about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
druidity33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #11
24. you know
you don't have to jump to the most disparaging conclusion. I was asking an honest question because i was hoping someone might already know the answer and chime in. I'm not a complainer, and if you knew anything about me, holy shit, you wouldn't have accused me of being one.

What i don't have is any respect for people here on DU who bloviate scorn (thinking they're amusing someone, generally) on a topic they know nothing about.

A little Googling turned up this quote from Dr Berwin:

“If I could wave a magic wand…health care a common good–single payer…health care a human right–universality is a non-negotiable starting place…justice a prerequisite to health–equity is a primary quality goal.”

and this:

“Fifth, please don’t put your faith in market forces. It’s a popular idea: that Adam Smith’s invisible hand would do a better job of designing care than leaders with plans can. I do not agree. I find little evidence anywhere that market forces, bluntly used, that is, consumer choice among an array of products with competitors’ fighting it out, leads to the health care system you want and need. In the US, competition has become toxic; it is a major reason for our duplicative, supply-driven, fragmented care system. Trust transparency; trust the wisdom of the informed public; but, do not trust market forces to give you the system you need. I favor total transparency, strong managerial skills, and accountability for improvement. I favor expanding choices. But, I cannot believe that the individual health care consumer can enforce through choice the proper configurations of a system as massive and complex as health care. That is for leaders to do.”



That's all i was looking for. A little confirmation that he's one of the good guys. I'm cheering for him and for Obama for choosing a good candidate... but i'm shaking my head at you Beetwasher.


Aliens, indeed.



:(



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Shake Your Head, But Don't Let Your Brain Fall Out
Edited on Wed Jul-07-10 03:04 PM by Beetwasher
See, you can put it to good use! Voila! The magic of the internet provides bounty.

It's not like I provided quotes or links in my OP that should have already given you indication that he's "one of the good guys". Oh wait, I did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
druidity33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. ah, i get it...
being an asshole is part of your "persona"!

SO sorry i missed your sigline, where you admit that.

:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Everyone's Got Their Cross To Bear
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. I read he's in favor of death panels.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
druidity33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #14
25. i read he says we already have them...
:eyes:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
10. K & R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
12. k+r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
17. Dawn Johnsen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-10 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
29. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC