Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

($243 million dollar) JSF tests begin to prepare for carrier landings

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 05:56 AM
Original message
($243 million dollar) JSF tests begin to prepare for carrier landings
JSF tests begin to prepare for carrier landings
By Andrew Tilghman - Staff writer
Posted : Friday Jun 25, 2010 17:07:06 EDT

Will the Navy version of the new F-35 Lightning II joint strike fighter hold up under the stress of real-life carrier landings?

That’s the next critical question for the F-35C after making its first flight June 6 in the skies over Texas.

Lockheed Martin has begun stress-tests that include dropping the aircraft from heights of more than 11 feet to gauge the structural integrity of the aircraft.

The company tested the drops at various angles and weight distributions in an effort to “mimic the wide range of landing conditions expected in the fleet,” according to a statement from Lockheed.

Preliminary computer-based testing identified cracking in the F-35s’ airframe, prompting adjustments in its design, Navy officials said.



unhappycamper comment: Lockheed Martin is desperately trying to get the not-ready-for-prime-time fighters working enough that we can spend another huge chunk of change on them. The 187 F-22s we purchased cost us over $66 billion; no reason for LM to earn less for the loser in the steath fighter race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 06:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. hmm...
My cousin might be working on those (I know he was working on the earlier F-35s). I'll ask him about it today and get back to you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 06:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. The F-35 has already has two invocations of "necessary for National Security"
exemptions on the Nunn-McCurdy Act. I seriously doubt any country (except this one) is stupid enough to actually buy these things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 06:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. How much of an exemption?
more than 25% over cost?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Oh yea. 25% is the Nunn-McCurdy trigger.
I'm trying to find the very specific non-disclaimer they use to keep these programs going.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC