Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

They are trucking the oil leak waste inland to landfills

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 03:54 PM
Original message
They are trucking the oil leak waste inland to landfills
http://www.2theadvocate.com/news/96533424.html

Ascension landfill gets oil leak waste‎

Thursday Edition
June 17, 2010

By DAVID J. MITCHELL

Advocate River parishes bureau

The BFI-Colonial Landfill near Sorrento is one of three landfills in Louisiana receiving cleanup waste from the Deepwater Horizon oil leak and has taken in the most waste so far, state environmental and company officials said Wednesday.

The deep-water rig drilling a BP well exploded off the coast of Louisiana on April 20, later sank and has spewed oil across the Gulf of Mexico despite efforts to plug or divert the flow, creating the largest oil disaster in U.S. history.

The 287-acre Colonial landfill, which is off La. 70 near the Panama Canal bridge, has been permitted, designed and built as an industrial and municipal solid waste landfill and has received similar types of non-hazardous oilfield wastes in the past, those officials said.

“This is definitely within our normal scope of business, and we’re both permitted and equipped to manage these materials,” said Susan David, spokeswoman for the Phoenix-based Republic Services Inc., parent of BFI.

Among the items being receiving are used absorbent and containment booms, protective suits and gloves and contaminated soil, which usually consists of oil and sand scooped from fouled shorelines, environmental officials said
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Whoa_Nelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Further contamination
Fuck You, BP.

And who the hell is allowing them access to the landfills to do this???? :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. "we’re both permitted and equipped to manage these materials"
The 287-acre Colonial landfill, which is off La. 70 near the Panama Canal bridge, has been permitted, designed and built as an industrial and municipal solid waste landfill and has received similar types of non-hazardous oilfield wastes in the past, those officials said.

“This is definitely within our normal scope of business, and we’re both permitted and equipped to manage these materials,” said Susan David, spokeswoman for the Phoenix-based Republic Services Inc., parent of BFI.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Would the dispersant also be on these things?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. If you don't like the solution, change it
The place to change it appears to be with the EPA or some other agency that has authorized and built these disposal areas.

Another rant about the awful BP doesn't do a fucking thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. What rant? I just asked a question and you yelled at me. :^(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. I'm not yelling at you
I just get so tired of these posts with these flippant comments that are either factually wrong or attack the wrong entity, and it just goes on and on and never ends.

This is actually a serious issue. I wondered what they did with the boom filling a few weeks ago. But to say damn BP or damn Coast Guard or damn Obama... it misses the target and does no good. Certainly damn Obama needs to know this is not going to be an acceptable solution in this case, at least I don't see how it can be, but my god let's organize sensibly for a change and really get to the core of the problem.

Wouldn't it be remarkable if Rachel identified the exact agency that approves these facilities, has a name and a Congressman lined up, and gets a new solution in, oh, say 24 hours. Now that's some change I can believe in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. I agree that it's a serious issue, which is why I wanted to know if these surface use and shore
items would have been exposed to the dispersant used in the deeper waters. I know they certainly didn't start out in the same locations, but would the ocean current have stirred things up enough that there would be some dispersant on them, and therefore need any sort of extra care in their disposal?

Maybe that's another questions Rachel can address? :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. The dispersants are EPA approved
They're usually used on top of the water, in areas without a lot of oil or when the weather makes the booms ineffective. Since dispersants are approved, I would think the approved disposal sites would accept that material too.

I just don't think we're prepared for disposal of the size we're faced with right now.

I'm sure Rachel will get to it, and/or Anderson Cooper, but I hope they don't do it in that yell at somebody way that takes way too long to get a result.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. where's it supposed to go?
inject it back into the underground oil resevoirs? we'll be mining landfills for oil in our near future anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yes we will. In my area we can only recycle #2 plastics. Guess where all the rest of them go?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Someone suggested they incinerate it a couple of days ago
Edited on Thu Jun-17-10 04:08 PM by NNN0LHI
I was a little skeptical of that when I read it.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lostnfound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. There are some 'waste to energy' plants including Florida
but it's a little scary even to think about it being crude oil let alone dispersant?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. Let BP haul it back to their corporate hqs.
Of course we know that will never happen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. Well why should only those on the coast suffer?
Let's spread the disaster as far inland as we possibly can.

No need to drill in Alaskan waters -- just truck and barge the waste up to Wassila.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
limit18 Donating Member (261 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
10. Ship it to Wahington and mix it with bullshit up there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. If it were my choice, it would end up in front of the Senate n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
11. Share the wealth
ship it to England.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
13. They should dump it on the pig farm in Texas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC