Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Administration Approves 448 New Drill Leases for Gulf of Mexico

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 08:03 AM
Original message
Obama Administration Approves 448 New Drill Leases for Gulf of Mexico
Source: Mother Jones

At his long-awaited press conference on the Gulf oil disaster last month, President Obama announced a moratorium on new oil drilling and exploration for six months. "We can't do this stuff if we don't have confidence that we can prevent crises like this from happening again," he declared. But while existing rigs may be out of commission for the near future, the administration hasn't exactly put the brakes on new oil and gas drilling ventures. In recent weeks, the government has quietly approved the sale of more than 400 new leases for vast swaths of the Gulf of Mexico. And these contracts—which mark the first step in the drilling process—were subjected to the same slapdash environmental oversight that failed to prevent the BP catastrophe.

The region was included in a plan created by the Bush administration's Department of the Interior to lease new areas of the Gulf to the oil and gas industries. But it was Obama's Interior secretary, Ken Salazar, who gave the go-ahead for the sale of Lease 213—6,800 tracts covering 36 million acres off the coasts of Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama in November 2009. The sale—which was held on March 17 this year in the New Orleans Superdome—attracted $1.3 billion in bids. Since then, the Department of the Interior's Minerals Management Service (MMS) has approved the sale of 448 of those tracts, 198 of them in deepwater, which is defined as more than 656 feet below the sea. BP is the proud new leaser of 13 of those tracts.

The lease sale is the first step in the oil drilling process. Companies must first obtain the right to drill the tracts before they can devise exploration plans, which must be approved by MMS.

And that's where the problem lies. MMS has been notorious for rubber-stamping the oil industry's plans. The lease for the well that's spewing oil into the Gulf, the Macondo, was sold in March 2008. The exploration plan for that well was granted a "categorical exclusion" from the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) in April 2009, paving the way for drilling to begin.

Earlier, in April 2007, MMS completed a 924-page Multisale Environmental Impact Statement for the Gulf region—covering both the site of the Deepwater disaster and these new tracts leased by the government. The statement projects that an "estimated 2-3 blowouts could occur" in the central Gulf in an average year, but significantly downplays the potential impact of a large spill. Most blowouts have a "short duration, and half of blowouts lasted less than half a day," the statement says, projecting that a large spill would only "acutely threaten recreational beaches for up to 30 days." The document also states that a large spill would only have a 23 to 25 percent risk of harming the waters of western Louisiana.

more: http://motherjones.com/environment/2010/06/new-drilling-leases-gulf-of-mexico
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. 198 of them in deepwater. This is no way to prevent future accidents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
85. Yikes! That is patently insane. Money trumps everything, it appears. n/t
:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chisox08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #85
88. Bush said money trumps peace. .
Now we can say money trumps the planet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. Live and don't learn...
(live for a while, anyway)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
53. Live and let die
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. You better follow Obama's advice..start praying..not that that will do a fucking thing..but it keeps
you busy and keeps you from paying too much attention to what these crooks are all doing to you and this nation of ours!

Maybe you can pray that a Walrus shows up in the Gulf.

Or our fish in the Gulf doesn't all die from contamination!

Or maybe you could pray that the pres stops selling this nation out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. We should pray, bend over and kiss our asses goodbye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
73. +
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. No, no, you don't understand! Obama's DA MAN!
He got Bigass Polluter to ante up 20 billion dollars! That should take care of everything!

I'm sure I don't need this, but
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
howmad1 Donating Member (959 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
67. Hmmmm, wonder how much of a cut.......
....Obama gets from that 20 billion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cwydro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 07:03 AM
Response to Reply #9
80. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
5. We reap what we sow.
:-(

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
6. As of June 11, 2010, only 85 were deemed acceptable
Edited on Thu Jun-17-10 09:22 AM by berni_mccoy
http://www.gomr.mms.gov/homepg/lsesale/213/213ph1letter.pdf

I do not know if these accepted bids were in deepwater or not.

These are also accepted bids, not approval for drilling. These are bids on leases.

The moratorium is on deepwater drilling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. There is only one reason to accept a bid..you are playing fast and furious to cover their asses! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. I'm reporting a fact. That fact is that before drilling can occur, a drilling operation must be
approved. Accepting a bid on a lease does not give permission to drill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. this is a fact as well!
Edited on Thu Jun-17-10 11:08 AM by flyarm
MMS has been notorious for rubber-stamping the oil industry's plans. The lease for the well that's spewing oil into the Gulf, the Macondo, was sold in March 2008. The exploration plan for that well was granted a "categorical exclusion" from the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) in April 2009, paving the way for drilling to begin.

BP is the proud new leaser of 13 of those "NEW" tracts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. Yes, in March, prior to Obama's moratorium on deepwater drilling.
How many are deepwater by the way?

And furthermore, Obama has already stated that MMS fucked up and he's going to reorganize it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. I guess you didn't bother to read the article did you? But I am not surprised of that fact..
Edited on Thu Jun-17-10 11:21 AM by flyarm
This article was written for JUne 17th..today..........

Thu Jun. 17, 2010 2:25 AM PDT

At his long-awaited press conference on the Gulf oil disaster last month, President Obama announced a moratorium on new oil drilling and exploration for six months. "We can't do this stuff if we don't have confidence that we can prevent crises like this from happening again," he declared. But while existing rigs may be out of commission for the near future, the administration hasn't exactly put the brakes on new oil and gas drilling ventures. In recent weeks,the government has quietly approved the sale of more than 400 new leases for vast swaths of the Gulf of Mexico. And these contracts—which mark the first step in the drilling process—were subjected to the same slapdash environmental oversight that failed to prevent the BP catastrophe.



recent weeks is not 3 months ago!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. Reading comprehension might help you. A lease is not an approval to drill.
And I cited March in response to your bullshit post about approvals to drill being given out in March... BEFORE the Moratorium on deepwater drilling.

Your intentionally confusing leases with drilling approval, which is spreading of misinformation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. I live on the now destroyed Gulf ..I fully understand that and have worked for years and years
Edited on Thu Jun-17-10 11:30 AM by flyarm
trying to stop these fucking leases!

Come have shit in your back yard and tell me about reading comprehension..and breathe our fucking stinking air !

I know damn well what these leases end up being and doing..I am living with the fucking results of it!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. You're entitled to your outrage. But not to make up facts.
But facts are facts. The OP is factually incorrect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. how bout these facts..the very day Obama signed off on drill baby drill
Edited on Thu Jun-17-10 11:40 AM by flyarm
hundreds of Democrats and enviornmentalists were protesting Newt in Fla ..because he was in Fla supporting new leases for drilling in the Gulf..much to the surprise and anger and distain of protesting DEMOCRATS....Obama at very same time Democrats were protesting Newt..the same time ...was shitting on his campaign promise to us in Fla that there would be no new leases and no new drilling!

I didn't break my promise..Obama did!

And made the democrats here look like fools!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. Doesn't change the fact that the OP is incorrect and even misleading.
Edited on Thu Jun-17-10 11:46 AM by berni_mccoy
And Obama actually campaigned on drilling domestically as part of a larger energy plan.

From his campaign: "Oil companies have access to 68 million acres of land, over 40 million offshore, which they are not drilling on. Drilling in open areas could significantly increase domestic oil and gas production."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. It isn't incorrect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. Its says: 448 new leases were approved. Yet, only 85 were actually accepted
See the link from my response that starts this long sub-thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #34
39. I went to your link and it says "As of April 13, 2010" 85 had been approved.
That was two months ago.

I don;t see where you got the date June 11?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #39
45. You missread it. It's June 11th. Follow the link
Edited on Thu Jun-17-10 11:55 AM by berni_mccoy
Sorry, I see what you are seeing. The document says April, but if you go here:

http://www.gomr.mms.gov/homepg/lsesale/213/cgom213.html

Go to the bottom, it was updated as of June 11th.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #45
49. Here is the link to the June 11 update. 448 bids accepted. The OP is correct.
Edited on Thu Jun-17-10 12:18 PM by tekisui
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #49
55. I stand corrected on the number, thanks. But the implication of the OP is still incorrect
That these somehow violate the moratorium or go counter to what Obama has recently stated about drilling. An acceptable lease is not a sale (that is the sales are not final). Furthermore, it's not an approval to drill.

Obama did not say he was going to end Drilling. He said he would reorg the MMS and would not allow deepwater drilling until better safety standards had been put in place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kermitt Gribble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #29
41. One of the main points of the article:
"And that's where the problem lies. MMS has been notorious for rubber-stamping the oil industry's plans."

1. Oil company acquires lease.
2. Oil company proposes plan to drill.
3. MMS fakes oversight and approves plan.

That's how it works. Your feeble defense of this is shameful - all to deflect negativity from your Dear Leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #41
47. Obama has already said the same thing about MMS. He even called it out in his Oval Office Address
That is the reason for the Moratorium and the reason he is reorganizing the MMS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #47
65. Obama is becoming well known for saying one thing
and doing the polar opposite. Have you heard one word about MMS employees being fired? NO. He's putting the same oil company hacks back into their old positions, just separating their responsibilities - slightly. No real changes are taking place. He's still just shilling for the oil companies as he has been since March.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #29
62. It is funny because you're trying to pass your opinion as a "fact"
Saying "you're wrong" without providing any reference to back up your assertion is you expressing an opinion as if it were a fact. Which is what you're chastising others for, a mighty hypocritical attitude. Projection is funny that way...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caseymoz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 02:02 AM
Response to Reply #25
77. This seems to be splitting hairs.

Putting a moratorium on drilling means you're doing nothing to lease out areas for new drilling. That's the simple understanding. For Obama to play it any other way is to attempt to trick the liberal-progressives, who want very much to be fooled. Period. It's not made better when this is a different part of the procedure than the one he said he'd stop. It's called misdirection, it's called trying to have it both ways, and it's dishonest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #22
48. Most of the ones approved on you link are deepwater.
All of Keathley Canyon.
All of Walker Ridge.
All of Mississippi Canyon.
All of Atwater Valley.
All of Green Canyon.

A few aren't offshore, but most are.



See map here to tell which one's from your link are deepwater:

http://www.oilvoice.com/n/Central_Gulf_of_Mexico_Lease_Sale_208/17ab7bdb.aspx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOTV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #22
61. Shouldn't all drilling approved by the previous MMS be stopped until ...
... the new MMS goes through all the papers all over again?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. as their disinformation campaign slogs on, eh?
Edited on Thu Jun-17-10 11:09 AM by dionysus
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. inorite?!
It's like there is no reading comprehension here. People see lease and go ape shit turning that into approval for drilling. It's either sub-level intelligence or a direct attempt to spread misinformation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #24
35. Why continue the process that lead to drilling?
Why continue to fast-track and rubber stamp the procedure that lead to offshore drilling?

I wonder how many lease approvals end without a drilling permit? I bet the number is low.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #35
37. A Moratorium on deepwater drilling until better standards are in place is a start.
Edited on Thu Jun-17-10 11:48 AM by berni_mccoy
But drilling for oil isn't going away until 350 million Americans stop consuming 20% of the world's oil.

And Obama has already invested more in renewables than any administration in history. Furthermore, he announced in his Oval Office Address that there will be a far larger investment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #37
40. There are no 'better standards' worth this risk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #40
44. Obama agrees that even better standards won't remove the risk. He said so in his Oval Office Address
The better standards can only reduce the risk.

That's why he's calling for Americans to reduce consumption and is going to be putting forth a far larger investment in renewables.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #44
51. If we cannot remove the risk, we should be doing it. Period.
No excuses, no apologies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #51
56. You'll have a problem explaining that to Americans who's way of living currently depend on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #56
58. I understand that.
But, it comes a point where we have to be bold and say, sorry the show's over. Let the current deepwater drilling leases expire on time (after careful safety inspections and oversight), and let's not start new ones. They can still drill in the shallow waters, where the risk isn't as great. They can drill on their land holdings. We have to draw the line somewhere, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #58
60. On that, I agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Daveparts still Donating Member (614 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #37
89. By Renewables
you include nuclear? Most Americans and a majority of Democrats are opposed to nuclear power.
John McCain wanted more nuclear and more off shore drilling and we voted for the other guy and look what we got.

Nine billion dollars in loan guarantees which the congressional budget office say have a 50% chance of failure.

Great Britain has a wind energy policy to be completed by 2020. enough wind energy to power every home in the country.

Germany has a program of wind energy that has been so effective that the power grid is having trouble keeping up and the power company has paid people to keep their lights burning.

Germany also has an experimental Geothermal power plant about to go on line.

An EU consortium wants to build the world's largest solar plant in the Sahara Desert.

In Australia Geothermal plants are all ready on line an the governments policy is full steam ahead. (pun intended)

An Island community in Denmark once had a ship docking each week to deliver Diesel fuel. They went to wind energy and converted what was left over from their crops to bio-diesel and no more fuel delivery's. Now the postman brings them annual checks of around $10,000 for the excess energy they sell to the mainland.

What countries want to build nuclear power?

Iran, China, India and the United States

What country in the world has the largest wind energy reserves? The US!
What country in the world has the largest solar power potential? The US!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #35
43. I bet not. I can't speak to offshore drilling
...but I can tell you, having followed them religiously when I lived in their shadow in Western Colorado, I'd say roughly 5% of competitive bid leases lead to application for drilling permits, and maybe 1 in 10 of those resulted in actual drilling taking place.

The leases are relatively cheap, and the same six or seven companies hit the auctions and gobbled up anything remotely worthwhile. And I do mean "remotely."

None of which excuses the above, BTW. Just interested in a fact-based conversation, silly me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #43
52. Thanks,Robb.
I honestly didn't know. I may try to dig up some numbers. It shouldn't be too hard to find the number of approved deepwater leases and compare it to the number of those leases that have well operating or in development.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #16
31. This is evidence that it is business as usual.
The moratorium on offshore drilling will expire (probably before the leak is plugged) and it will be back to the same practices that caused this disaster.

These approvals just show that we are going to keep on keeping on. And, I do not accept that adequate safety measures can be put in place to prevent accidents. The accidents, however low the probability, carry far too great a risk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #31
42. Again, you don't have the facts.
The moratorium isn't on offshore drilling. It's on deepwater drilling, and it's there until revised safety standards and regulations are in place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #42
50. Sorry, I meant deepwater drilling.
And, it stands. Deepwater drilling cannot be made safe enough for the risk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #50
91. You're 100% correct.
The BOP that can handle the excessive pressures in deep water wells hasn't even been invented yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #42
54. Wake up. Put Country first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
7. DRILL BABY DRILL!
It's OK when our people do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
8. Insanity. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
10. oops, better take mine down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
11. Nice move there. Some company must have found out how to stop oil gushers in 5000+ feet of ocean
right? :sarcasm:

Actions really do speak louder than words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
12. Lesson not learned. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #12
63. +
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alterfurz Donating Member (723 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
13. well, with the entire Gulf fast becoming a dead zone...
...soon it won't matter much what we do there anymore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #13
21. Precisely n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tiptoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #13
36. That was the other reason
Edited on Thu Jun-17-10 11:51 AM by tiptoe


I suspected CEO Hayward was stalling a quick fix, the other being to allow hurricane(s) to do the job of "dispersing" BP liability.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
15. This says more to me about this administration's response
than any corporate deal does. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #15
26. Indeed.
Edited on Thu Jun-17-10 11:24 AM by tekisui
And, don't for a second think there wasn't a 'deal'. BP didn't cough up $20+ billion without getting something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #26
76. +1
BP didn't cough up $20+ billion without getting something.

No shit

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #26
92. Brings back fond memories of HCR
and the deals cut with Pharma behind closed doors.

I so long for the good old days, don't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #15
72. As always; deeds, not words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
27. "drill, baby, drill" redux
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
38. This is how we know it's all a lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
46. The Gulf of Texaco is fucked already.
Might as well fill it up the rest of the way. At least five states economies will be dead as a door nail. Think about the implications of that.

The air in Manhattan is safe to breathe.

Nuclear power is safe.

The spill will be plugged by the end of the year.

BP and the feds are telling the truth.

ad infinitum, ad nauseum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #46
68. 'Gulf of Texaco' - Perfect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #46
93. Notice they didn't specify which year they're talking about. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paparush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
57. Do the individual States have any say in this process?
I'm guessing these leases are in territorial waters (or some such designation).

Or do the individual states profit from these leases?

Somebody teach me how this works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
59. But, but, but the Gulf of Mexico never loved Obama to begin with.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
64. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
spoony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
66. White House spin will not make this go away
Thanks for posting this, Tekisui
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
69. Incredibly fucked up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
70. Another corporate action by a corporate administration
Edited on Thu Jun-17-10 04:32 PM by Individualist
An indefensible action. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
71. Just horrible, K&R
Edited on Thu Jun-17-10 04:31 PM by quinnox
No words. All the Obama cheerleading and spin in the world can't make this look good, judging from all the deleted messages they are not happy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
74. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #74
84. +1 Well said. n/t
:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
75. D.L.C. must go. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 03:10 AM
Response to Original message
78. We have a full blown disaster still ongoing and he sells more leases?
He's making himself appear to be either weak or a liar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gleaner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
79. What is left of the Gulf is going to be like the Caspian Sea ....
Surrounded by drilling platforms and full of the toxic chemicals they dump. What in Hell can survive this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cwydro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
81. k and r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
82. Of course we're going to keep drilling for oil
We all have cars, heat and A/C, come on, most rigs do not have accidents. It's unreasonable to expect the drilling to stop completely just because of this accident. What is the point of being so snide and unreasonable?

We need alternative sources of energy and developing that is what we need to do. That takes time. There needs to be a gradual changeover.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #82
90. No deepwater drilling. It is absurd to even entertain that prospect further.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokercat999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
83. Doesn't matter, the Gulf will be a tar pit by this time next
year anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
86. Whee!
That is all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chisox08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
87. Didn't he learn anything from the Oil Volcano in the Gulf of Mexico?
We have oil spewing in the Gulf of Mexico with no end in sight and President Obama approves more wells. What The Flying Fuck? These greedy bastards won't be happy until all life is wiped out in the Gulf.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
94. K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
95. insane in the membrane

:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC