Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Forever War: U.S. military officials play down year-end Afghan review

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 05:44 AM
Original message
The Forever War: U.S. military officials play down year-end Afghan review


Gen. David Petraeus, appearing on Capitol Hill with Michele Flournoy, undersecretary of Defense for policy, clarified his position on the Afghan withdrawal plan.


U.S. military officials play down year-end Afghan review
By David S. Cloud, Los Angeles Times
June 17, 2010

U.S. military officials Wednesday damped expectations for quick results from offensives in Afghanistan and played down a year-end review that the Obama administration had portrayed as a major evaluation of the U.S.-led war.

"I would not want to overplay the significance of this review," Army Gen. David H. Petraeus, who oversees U.S. forces in the Mideast and Afghanistan, told members of the House Armed Services Committee, referring to plans by the administration to evaluate progress in Afghanistan in December. "We would not make too much out of that."

Administration officials announced the review last year when President Obama ordered 30,000 additional troops to Afghanistan. At the time, officials characterized it as an opportunity to evaluate whether it would be possible to begin handing off security responsibilities to Afghan forces in July 2011, the deadline set by Obama for beginning a U.S. drawdown.

"If it appears the strategy is not working, and we will not be able to transition to Afghan security forces by 2011, we will take a hard look at the strategy," Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates said at the time.

But Petraeus emphasized Wednesday that December would be too soon to make a far-reaching evaluation, noting that all of the additional U.S. forces would have been there for only a few months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 06:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. The American Empire: All war, all the time.
I made this graphic years ago...2002, I think. I'm very sad that it still applies today. :(



I guess I'll have to update the whole 'Bush' thing, since this is now Obama's Dirty Little War. :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 06:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. Surprise..
.... the military and it's illustrious leaders cannot deliver on the ridiculous promises they made to do the impossible.

Like a fly by night home remodeler, they want to continue working on the house indefinitely, with no real improvement made and no end in sight.

We are not going to fix Iraq or Afghanistan no matter how long we stay. If a rube like me can figure that out I'm sure these lying assholes already know as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 06:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. Dumbest war ever.
This war has several justifications, none of them legit.

Its purpose is the use of military personnel and assets, to create a market for war merchants and their goods. It is an industry, and keeping us at war is how it creates demand.

There is economic opportunity in minerals there, but will the profits from those minerals ever be worth more than the war costs spent trying to secure the unsecurable? Of course not.

The whole poppy harvest is a diversion. No one cares about that. They've been growing those and selling them for longer than anyone can remember.

Afghanistan cannot be conquered. Its landlocked status is also its gravel moat. Marching in and flying in are the only ways to move materiel and men into the region to fight. Afghanistan can be occupied, but it cannot be defeated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 06:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. IN A PERFECT NUTSHELL. Thank you! The soldiers need the jobs; we offer none back home.
Edited on Thu Jun-17-10 06:40 AM by WinkyDink
War materiel is our major industry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 06:38 AM
Response to Original message
4. It's a War of Aggression to STEAL AFGHANISTAN'S TREASURE. Is this not CLEAR yet to everybody??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC