Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ohio White Hat Charter management refuses to testify before state legislature.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 10:05 PM
Original message
Ohio White Hat Charter management refuses to testify before state legislature.
Edited on Mon Jun-07-10 10:06 PM by madfloridian
This is a charter school group which like others gets public taxpayer money. They are being sued by some of their own schools who are unhappy with management.

If they get public money they should be forced to answer to the public.

To make matters worse the school management says if the schools leave their group, there will be a price to pay. White Hat management says they will still own all the "buildings, furniture, books, curricula and equipment."

White Hat is owned by David Brennan, and yes, he really does wear a white hat.
http://www.whitehatmgmt.com/about/leadership/brennan/



From the Cincinnati Enquirer:

Charter school operator on hot seat

The state's biggest charter school operator last week refused to testify at a state legislative hearing into whether Ohio's laws give too much power to for-profit charter school companies.

It is being sued by 10 of its charter schools in Cleveland and Akron, who say the company spends too little on education, keeps too much in profit and is too secretive about it all. The governing boards of the 10 schools also claim that protections in Ohio law for charter school managers are unconstitutional and render the governing boards "virtually impotent."

The suit asks a court to:

-Void the schools' contracts with White Hat.

-Prevent White Hat from removing anything from the schools.

-Declare the state law granting White Hat Management its operating authority unconstitutional.


The company really has threatened the schools about the property.

Ohio White Hat Charters....what was bought with public money now belongs to them.

In a suit filed Monday in Franklin County Common Pleas Court, the school boards argue the law is unconstitutional because it gives too much power to White Hat, one of the largest charter school operators in the nation. The company was founded by David Brennan, a prominent Akron businessman and Republican donor.

The suit charges that White Hat lobbied the state legislature for changes to the charter school law in 2006 that made it possible for White Hat to fire any school board that tries to sever ties with the management company.

Nor is it financially feasible for a charter school to switch operators because White Hat's contracts state that it owns the school's property, furniture and equipment — even though they were all paid for with tax dollars, according to the complaint.

''Essentially, White Hat created an educational model where tax dollars flow to the private corporation with little room for oversight or control by the schools' governing bodies,'' said a news release accompanying the filing of the lawsuit.


"Further, the law makes White Hat's receipt of tax dollars hard to stop."


The law needs changing, and these schools that receive public money must be held accountable to the public.

I fear there is a rush to lift the caps on the number of charter schools in a state...a requirement of getting the money from the DOE. There needs to be more thinking about this, and less rushing headlong into plans that have not been proven to work...especially plans that involve public money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. I could swear that hat is on backwards.
And that's probably indicative of the entire philosophy of White Hat.

What a bunch of scoundrels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Nice journal you have...cute pic also.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. It's a work in progress.
And thanks! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. ENOUGH of this corporate crap of taking public $$ and refusing oversight
If the free market is so wonderful, corporations should live or die by it if they don't want to answer questions and be held accountable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. the race to the top has unforseen consequences nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Yes, there are consequences.
They are pushing all this too fast, not thinking of all the problems with mixing public and private money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. Gee we handed him the keys to the state treasury
Who knew he was going to just pocket the money and refuse to account for it to anyone? It would have been real hard for anyone to have predicted this - he's the guy in the white hat!

My advice to the Ohio legislature is give this guy what he says is his, then repeal the legislation and let him choke on "his" buildings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Right. Who would have thunk it. The arrogance.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
9. Editorial about it from the Plain Dealer
http://www.cleveland.com/opinion/index.ssf/2010/05/ohio_must_tighten_laws_governi.html

"The courts will decide the merits of a lawsuit filed by 10 dissident charter school boards against White Hat Management, a for-profit charter school company based in Akron. The suit alleges White Hat has unconstitutional control over the boards.

But the dispute already offers an unsettling glimpse into a system that gave $636 million to about 320 charter schools last year but is ripe for waste, fraud and abuse.

The Ohio General Assembly, which is responsible for this untenable situation, must clarify and strengthen loophole-riddled laws on community school management.

James Stubbs, a board member of Cleveland's Hope Academy, says White Hat used its influence to prod legislators to pass a law diluting the power of charter school boards and making it nearly impossible for them to terminate contracts with an operator like White Hat.

.."That concept of wider educational freedom is well worth preserving, but too much administrative latitude has led to waste and abuse, causing damage to students and taxpayers alike. Misfeasance by some charter school boards is what prompted the last reform effort; now legislators need to get tougher with for-profit charter managers as well."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 02:13 AM
Response to Original message
10. But, but, DUers tell me charter school operators are more responsive to their clients!
how can this blackmail be happening?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
24. Yeah, I Heard That Too (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cmd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 04:04 AM
Response to Original message
11. Brennan is a top contributor to Ohio Republicans
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Interesting link. Thanks. Bill was passed 4 yrs ago.
"The bill that allows White Hat Management the ability to seize the charter schools’ property if their contract is not renewed, even if the charter schools had purchased the equipment with its own taxpayer provided funds, was passed in the final month of a lame duck session of the General Assembly in 2006 and signed into law one week before Gov. Strickland took office, according to the Cleveland Plain Dealer.

..."To the surprise of nobody, White Hat Management’s executives have been major donors to the Kasich-Taylor campaign, as they’ve been to all other prior Republican causes.? In fact, the lame-duck bill that gave White Hat Management so much leverage over the for-profit charter schools was authored by Ken Blackwell’s running mate, who also received considerable support from White Hat’s execs.

.."From David Brennan’s wallet to John Kasich’s mouth. He wants to give David Brennan more of the “market share” of building Florida mansions in Naples with tax dollars meant to educate children".

That's true. In one of the links above I posted about a school in FL who has really pulled some shenanigans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cmd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. I first ran into Brennan's political donations when I was doing some research
I was working on a congressional campaign and looking for the big money donors of our opponents. Brennan's name popped up as the main donor on several of the Republican lists. As a I retired teacher I was aware of his involvement in charters, but didn't realize the extent of control that he has on Ohio politics. He is definitely out to defund public schools and has no qualms about how he does it. I appreciate the work you are doing and would become more involved, but am having some serious health issues right now that are taking all my energy. Good luck and thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spheric Donating Member (512 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 04:27 AM
Response to Original message
12. But, who could have predicted this?
It's nobody's fault. Just one of those things.

:sarcasm:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
15. In their haste to destroy the teachers' unions...
they left the door open for massive fraud and abuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. And we can't get Arne's attention on the subject.
He does not listen to our side of the issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. He is not interested in what teachers have to say.
He is not interested in best practices, in pedagogy, or teaching. He likes taking over, firing people, and blaming.

Say it loudly and clearly: Arne Duncan is not an educator. He has never spent one day in a public school classroom as a teacher or a student. His only job qualification is his jump shot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truth2power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. You are correct. He never spent one day in a public school classroom...
Here's a link to his bio:

http://ed.gov/news/staff/bios/duncan.html

He has a degree in sociology from Harvard University (magna cum laude).

Was Supt. of Chicago Public Schools, 2001-2008.

I see he spent a lot of time in Chicago. Hmm...

I agree. He knows nothing of what a classroom teacher experiences. Just about everything he's done has been administration-based.

IMO, Obama could have found a better candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. You Said It In A Nutshell:
"He is not interested in best practices, in pedagogy, or teaching. He likes taking over, firing people, and blaming. "


Deserves a thread of its own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
18. Kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
19. They think they're above the law
Call me not the least bit surprised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
20. What an asshat
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truth2power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
22. This is what happens when you lie down with dogs...
You get up with fleas.

I'm just wondering why those 10 schools didn't take a closer look at the terms of the contract they were signing on to. Ya' know, best to always look at possible escape clauses, in the event you need to disassociate yourself from someone. Just sayin'. :eyes:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. And just imagine...the state itself gave white hat the power.
And they never considered the consequences.

And our Sec of Ed just keeps barreling on with his schemes....and there is no looking ahead on them either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladym55 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. The "state" WAS the Republican Party
For 16 years, the Republicans controlled the governor's office, the state Supreme Court, and both legislative houses. Anyone with a brain knew that Brennan was going to rip off the students and undermine public education in the state. We complained LOUDLY when this was first implemented, but as mere voters and citizens, our voices were not heard.

Brennan's schools did NOT have to follow state curricula (Brennan considered them "socialist"), did not have to provide classes such as phys ed, and at the time, paid teachers $19,000 a year.

Brennan is incredibly powerful, and the Democrats in Ohio are stronger than they were, but still not that powerful. During his four years in office, Strickland has NOT had a majority to work with in the legislature. The Republicans still control the State Senate and behave in the same obstructionist way in Ohio that they do on the federal level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
26. Just did a search on this.
I wanted to see if any Democratic leaders were paying attention and were saying enough is enough.

I did not see anything about it.

Thumbing his nose at the state legislature. Public school leaders could never do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. Tip of the iceberg `
Please bookmark my post and check it in 1 year.

This is only the start of a huge problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC