Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Richard Fisher, Senior Fed Official: White House Is Dead Wrong

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-10 09:48 PM
Original message
Richard Fisher, Senior Fed Official: White House Is Dead Wrong
Richard Fisher, president of the Dallas Fed, has long been a proponent of serious financial sector reform. As a former commercial banker, he sees quite clearly that the legislation now headed into "reconciliation" between House and Senate versions amounts to very little. He also knows that pounding away repeatedly on this theme is the best way to influence his colleagues within the Fed and across the policy community more broadly.

He is now taking his game to a new, higher level. Couched in the diplomatic language of senior officials, his speech on June 3 to the SW Graduate School of Banking was both a carefully calibrated assault on the administration's general "softly, softly" approach to the big banks and a direct refutation of arguments put forward by Larry Summers in particular.

As the title of Mr. Fisher's speech implies, if the legislation is not real financial reform (and it is not, according to him), then our current policy trajectory amounts to facilitating further rounds of financial dementia.

As a statement of our true problems -- dismissing the red herrings and focusing on the core issues -- Mr. Fisher's speech is a succinct classic. Cutting to the chase:

More: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/simon-johnson/richard-fisher-senior-fed_b_602386.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-10 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-10 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Obama is just another dipshit politician?
Interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-10 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Still in Iraq..
... still in Afghanistan, ridiculous health care "reform", still licking Israel's ass, still letting corps and money men run the show.

Yes, fucking dipshit politician.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-10 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. No, all those descriptions aren't interesting.
What is interesting is that the Democratic President is being called a dipshit politician. I call that whining.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-10 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Call it what you will..
... it's a fact. Obama is 100% talk and 5% action.

He sucks and I will never vote for him again. I am as bitterly disappointed in him as I was with Bush, and I didn't expect shit from Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-10 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Well that's your problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-10 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Unfortunately..
... it is the country's problem. In a time of crisis, perhaps the worst in decades, he merrily goes along with the idiots that created it.

Some leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-10 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. No, just the problem of those who demand
that he does what they think is right. They may be wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-10 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. No, they're not wrong.
And they haven't been wrong for the past 30 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-10 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #13
23. the candidate of CHANGE is turning out to be the total opposite.
And more and more people are seeing through the smoke and mirrors. Apologists don't make the situation any better, in fact all the attacks on dissent is probably making things worse.

But apologists don't *do* nuance... :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 06:53 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. Ah now we play word games.
Apologists seem to me to be the ones who can't take no for an answer, who demand and cry foul while doing nothing but stirring up their followers. I would rather look at the reality and go from there. A constant preconceived notion of being the victim must be a terrible way to live.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. apologists have their own level of *reality*
Sad to say it's not in the real world. Tiger Beat world is fun though, isn't it? :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-10 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. Of course you do. Calling criticism whining is the only response you have.
It's losing whatever little effect it may've had, you should think of something better.

(and by you I don't mean you personally, it seems to be the generic response)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-10 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. Indeed. Nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-10 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. I am disappointed with this feeble attempt as well. Unfortunately, Obama has
chosen the same "free-market" jerks that created the financial crisis. Sadly, Summers and Geithner still seem to believe the bullshit they peddled years ago...them and Greenspan, that is. I wish Obama would get some new people in and ditch some of these completely discredited fools.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-10 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. +1 nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-10 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. +1000
Geithner and Summers should be flipping burgers, they are IDIOTS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-10 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
14.  I wish he would listen to Elizabeth Warren.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-10 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Elizabeth Warren
Elizabeth Warren:

“No bill that deals with big issues is ever perfect, but the Senate’s Wall Street reform package will go a long way toward preventing the kinds of abusive practices that brought our economy to its knees. Getting to this point was a tough slog, and President Obama and Chairman Dodd deserve a lot of credit for producing a strong bill.”


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-10 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
10. Richard Fisher
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-10 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
15. I'm tired of half ass solutions to full blown problems.
We need politicians to are willing to solve the problems we have, and so far I haven't seen any. This group seems to be a large part of the problem. K/R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-10 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Full blown and exponentially escalating.
Why the hell did Obama decide the DLC was the best route for governance? I hope he writes a book about it, explaining his decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-10 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. What could he possible say..
to justify selling our country out so thoroughly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. I got nothing. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-10 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
17. you lovin
the hate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-10 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
22. Stiglitz

Letter from Joseph Stiglitz re. Section 716: Prohibition Against Federal Bailouts of Swaps Entities

Dear Members of the Senate:

I strongly support the passage of the derivatives and swaps regulation sections of the Senate Financial Reform Bill and especially Section 716 (“Prohibition Against Federal Bailouts of Swaps Entities“). If the Senate fails to pass strict regulatory oversight over dangerous over-the-counter derivatives and swaps, then the U.S. economy will continue to be vulnerable to significant financial risks.

Many economists agree that the unregulated, over-the-counter derivatives market played a key role in transforming a financial downturn into a global economic calamity. The derivatives regulation amend-ments that Senators Lincoln and Dodd have incorporated into the “Restoring Financial Stability Act of 2010” bring a critically important measure of regulation over dangerous derivatives and swaps prod-ucts by requiring: exchange-trading and clearing of most standard derivatives; the prudential regulation of major swaps dealers, including capital reserves requirements and business conduct rules; the spin-ning off of risky swaps desks from the systemically risky banks; and the ability of regulators to ban swaps that lead to financial instability or have no economic purpose.

more (PDF)




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC