Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What does immigration "amnesty" mean to you.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 06:04 PM
Original message
What does immigration "amnesty" mean to you.
Edited on Tue May-25-10 06:08 PM by Cant trust em
I've talked to different people about this and I've gotten different responses as to what this means. I think that there's a possibility of a semantics argument going on here. Please respond what you think amnesty as a policy is, and if you support that idea.

Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Path to citizenship is what I would support.
Humane, without tearing families apart or sending people "back where they came from" as they go through the channels to citizenship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Your avatar is quite awesome.
Edited on Tue May-25-10 06:06 PM by Cant trust em
Really really clever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Totally stolen but it says it all :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. That's fine. I'm going to steal it from you.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unvanguard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. Legalization without any penalties.
Which is what I would support for all the people already here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Would it be acceptible to you to have them pay....
Edited on Tue May-25-10 06:27 PM by Cant trust em
something equivalent to what other legal immigrants paid to get their visa or such document?

My goal in immigration reform is to not make it any harder or easier for people currently living here to gain citizenship than any other person who wishes to call this country home. If paying some kind of fees makes the process equal, then that is what I want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Fair enough.
That sounds fair enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unvanguard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. People who are already here deserve citizenship as a matter of right.
They already make up a part of our society: we have an obligation to give them equal rights to everyone else, as soon as possible and without conditions.

The way I see it is, it's too late to complain about the rules they broke: they're here now, most of them have been here for years, and to make them go through a complicated, penalty-heavy legalization process is just to perpetuate the inaccurate and unfair myth that they don't already in every material sense belong here just as much as anyone else. At this point, the failure is not on their part: the failure is on the part of the law, for not recognizing them.

I recognize, however, that this is an extreme minority view, so I am willing to support any form of immigration reform that legalizes the status of undocumented immigrants and gives them a path to citizenship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. I support a path to citizenship
Secure the borders, and those who are now here, make them get a legal social security card, pay taxes etc..., give them citizenship as long as they are not felons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Northerner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
6. According to the right-wing, ANY pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants is labeled amnesty
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. Legal status for those who are in country at the time
basically an impossibility given the attitudes towards illegal immigrants on both the "left" and right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caliman73 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
10. Amnesty is a hot button term these days.
It has real legal meaning, which is to return a certain group of offenders of the law to a state of legal innocence. With regards to immigration it would mean allowing people who are in the country without proper documentation to be free of that charge in order for the to have an opportunity to apply for residence and citizenship without the charge of entering the country illegally barring them from doing so. To me, it does not mean that people who are here without documentation would get a free pass and become citizens automatically. That is what I think many people interpret "amnesty" to be. It is merely the setting aside of the civil infraction of entering illegally so that the path to legal residency and citizenship are not blocked. If an individual has been here working and staying clear of other involvement in the criminal justice system, then I support the policy of allowing them an opportunity to apply for legal citizenship.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
11. If they aren't breaking any laws (other than immigration laws only) and they are productive
non-citizens, I see no reason to deny them a path to citizenship. Half the reason half of them are here illegally is because of how hard it is to come here legally. Give them a fighting chance. Hate me for that opinion if you (that's a generally speaking you, not the OP directly) will, but I just feel they are people who want a fighting chance in life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
13. Oh, you mean the Meat Packers and Lettuce Growers Civil Relief Act?
Where, instead of going to Smithfield Foods in Tar Heel and all the lettuce farms in California and arresting the HR people who can't figure out how to check Mexicans for legal status, they legalize the illegals who are already here.

Here's the thing: There is NO fucking way we are ever going to solve the illegal immigration problem without jailing some employers and accepting that food is going to get more expensive, because the reality of the situation is, illegals can get jobs in no-profit industries like agriculture because they'll take less than minimum wage. It costs a farmer three years' profit to plant this year's crop, and he needs a LOT of workers to tend and harvest what he grows. (Go to a produce department and look at all the pretty veggies and fruits. Someone had to put his hand on each one of those and cut them off the plant.) About the only way he can economize is to cut down on labor expenses. He can't just hire fewer people because fruits and vegetables have to be harvested quickly before they rot in the field. Therefore, he's got to get people who work for less than minimum wage--and if they're in the US legally they can't do it. But if they're undocumented he can cook the books to make it look like he's employing fewer people than he is.

If you can deal with food getting 50 percent more expensive, at minimum, we can deal with solving the illegal immigration problem. (And imagine what Walmart would do if you told them that! Fucking Bentonville would commit corporate seppuku over the notion they had to have mass Rollforwards in the grocery department--if a price cut is a Rollback, a price increase has GOT to be a Rollforward.) Until that happens, forget it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
15. That using the system is not a reward, circumventing it gets you the best results (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William Z. Foster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. or...
...that the system is the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petronius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
16. Without reading other posts, I think it means granting permanent residency status
to people who are currently in the country without authorization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJoe Donating Member (664 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
17. It's a Lou Dobbs word used to label and then kill reform n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TransitJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
19. What it really means
is that Capital gets amnesty by no prosecutions or fines to them, and they get to legitimize their peonage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC