Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bob Herbert: "President Obama should have taken charge of the response to the oil spill"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 09:47 PM
Original message
Bob Herbert: "President Obama should have taken charge of the response to the oil spill"
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/25/opinion/25herbert.html

Following BP’s Lead
By BOB HERBERT
Published: May 24, 2010

-snip-

Nice outfit, this BP. Anyone who thought this London-based wrecking crew gave a rat’s whisker about harming the Gulf of Mexico or threatening the environment of the Louisiana wetlands — or the livelihoods of families living here — has been inhaling way too much of BP’s toxic fumes.

-snip-

BP got off much too easy with the fines it agreed to in 2007. And for some odd reason, it’s being treated much too deferentially now. This crisis has gone on for more than a month, and neither BP nor the Obama administration seems to know what to do.

-snip-

President Obama should have taken charge of the response to the oil spill — which he called a “potentially unprecedented” environmental calamity — from jump street. He should have called in the very best minds and operatives from the corporate and scientific worlds and imposed an emergency plan of action — to be carried out by BP and all others who might be required. Instead, after all this time, after more than a month of BP’s demonstrated incompetence, the administration continues to dither.

Incredibly, until The Times blew the whistle in an article on Monday, environmental waivers were still being offered for oil drilling in the gulf. What will it take for sanity to prevail? How many people have to die or face ruin, and how much of nature has to be despoiled before we rein in the cowboys of these runaway corporations?

Steadily increasing numbers of anxiety-ridden coastal residents are watching not just their livelihoods but an entire way of life slip away. Even as BP’s lawyers are consumed with the task of limiting the company’s liability, the administration continues to insist it has little choice but to follow the company’s lead in fighting the spill. That is dangerous nonsense.

President Obama has an obligation to make it unmistakably clear that BP’s interests are not the same as America’s interests. He needs to stand shoulder to shoulder with the people who are taking the brunt of this latest corporate outrage. The oil has now stained nearly 70 miles of the Louisiana Coast. No one can say what terrible toll the gusher is taking in the depths of the gulf. And spreading right along with the oil is a pervasive and dismaying sense of helplessness from our leaders in Washington.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
marylanddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Excellent article. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Breaking News: Obama To Dive 5000 Feet In The Gulf To Stop Gusher.....
now that would be taking charge. Is that what they want?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MUAD_DIB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Apparently. It's that easy, isn't it?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShamelessHussy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. do you think this is funny? do you think people being concerned about this is a joke?
of course you do
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. it's the standard response of, well, you know
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. That one's really gotten a workout today--it's all over the place.
I wish the central committee would send out some new talking points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #14
28. it's really the only one they can come up with
I mean, really
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. +
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #14
32. They support Obama, not the Gulf of Mexico. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Hilarious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. same response for little stuff as big stuff
it's all very tiresome, PT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. How old are you, if you don't mind my asking? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. actually, he should be in charge since this is going to be an
international incident of unprescedented scale. Jamaica just called for a national emergency. He either takes charge or he will lose the presidency and his legacy if he doesn't. This detachment shit is going to kill us all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #2
25. Yes, weeks ago. He's late. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. SOME peeps don't want "the big, bad gov" messing
w/ "private" companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 02:50 AM
Response to Reply #6
30. Yeah; Reagan, Friedman, Bush, Palin, Limbaugh, Beck, Cheney, Paul, Rove, Bachmann...
though none of them are my "peeps".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #30
37. I was thinking of "baggers." nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. How long before someone says that Bob Herbert never really supported the president?
It seldom takes long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. OMG, Herbert was Obama's biggest commentator supporter
I like Herbert.

Some pundits (like David gergen) also seem to understand the fragile vulnerability of coastal wetlands. I'm impressed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I know that, and you know that,
but sooner or later, everyone who disagrees with anything the president does is accused of never having really supported him anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. we can all meet Bob under the bus
Bob is my favorite columnist :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. One of my faves, along with Krugman, who was once, in these parts,
the source of all that is evil in the world but is now, all of a sudden, the Delphic Oracle.

Funny how that works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 07:17 AM
Response to Reply #16
33. Herbert, MoDo and Frank Rich gave us George W. Bush in 2000. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #9
22. #18
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #9
27. Or until they accuse him of being a racist?
I wish I was kidding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KonaKane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
18. And do what, exactly?
All the things the article author wanted him to do, he's done and more than once. What else would you like the president to do? Swoop in in majestically from the sky in a superman outfit, glare at the spill with his oil-clean-ray vision and scan the horizon? Move his hand slowly over the waters while muttering ancient chants in Latin, and watch the oil turn into pristine sea water? Personally get the BP execs in a headlock and put them in hazmat suit so they can clean it all up?

I am at a loss lately to explain how common sense has evaporated from DU on this subject. I constantly hear from wingnuts "you liberals, you only think with hysterical emotions". Thanks for fucking proving them right for once.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. 'Thanks for fucking proving them right for once.' - - Dramatic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #21
36. Y'all are, you know. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
19. More claims that don't mesh with reality
President Obama should have taken charge of the response to the oil spill — which he called a “potentially unprecedented” environmental calamity — from jump street. He should have called in the very best minds and operatives from the corporate and scientific worlds and imposed an emergency plan of action — to be carried out by BP and all others who might be required. Instead, after all this time, after more than a month of BP’s demonstrated incompetence, the administration continues to dither.


Gergen made the same demand:

A month ago, it looked like the White House was on top of this problem, as Cabinet officers scurried here and there, the Coast Guard and others swung into action, there were talks with BP, and the president paid a personal visit. But increasingly, it has become apparent that the federal government may be present but is not in charge.

It keeps saying that BP bears ultimate responsibility. It is keeping the press away. No wonder James Carville, Chris Matthews and Donna Brazile exploded late last week. They are right on a basic point: Ultimately it is not the responsibility of BP or any other company to protect American interests but the responsibility of the federal government. Some Obama supporters have argued that the 1990 Oil Pollution Act limits the president's capacity to take action. Others disagree. Either way, in an emergency, laws can be changed.

Although this disaster is not an existential threat, it could be argued that if the U.S. government had fought World War II in the same way it has fought the oil spill, we might well be speaking German now. Faced with a growing danger to our well-being, a WWII-type government would at minimum have:

• Brought in the CEOs of all the major oil companies and charged them with the duty of an all-hands collaborative effort to stop the spill and help ward off the damage.

• Brought in the best minds in the country, from universities and technology, for emergency efforts to find solutions.

• Moved quickly to mobilize the National Guard and other military forces, if necessary, ensuring that they received the resources needed to protect our beaches.

• Made a clear call to citizen volunteers to help where necessary.

• Given Cabinet officers an ultimatum: Get this under control in the next 30 days, or else.

There will be ample time after this disaster for finger-pointing and blame-laying. The key now is to get this spill under control before it does far more damage.

<...>


Let's see:

• Brought in the best minds in the country, from universities and technology, for emergency efforts to find solutions.

WEDNESDAY, MAY 19

Top Scientists Engaging Closely with BP’s Efforts to Cap the Leak

As a responsible party, BP is charged with capping their leaking oil well. However, the U.S. government is taking an active role to ensure that BP’s approach is as strong and as innovative as possible. The Department of Energy has engaged some of the world’s top scientific and engineering minds from Sandia, Los Alamos and Livermore Labs—to lend their expertise to BP’s efforts to cap the well and permanently stop the leak.

These government scientists are reviewing every plan on the table, validating those that are moving forward and providing additional expertise and input on new tactics.


• Moved quickly to mobilize the National Guard and other military forces, if necessary, ensuring that they received the resources needed to protect our beaches.

FRIDAY, APRIL 30

In response to the BP oil spill, the Secretary of Defense authorizes under Title 32 the mobilization of the Louisiana National Guard to help in the ongoing efforts to assist local communities in the cleanup and removal of oil and to protect critical habitats from contamination.



TUESDAY, MAY 4

National Guard Activation

Secretary Gates has authorized use of Title 32 status for up to 17,500 National Guard members in four states: Alabama (3,000), Florida (2,500), Louisiana (6,000) and Mississippi (6,000).

The state of Louisiana has activated approximately 1,200 National Guard members under Title 32 for command and control and sandbagging operations in St Bernard and Plaquemines parishes. Louisiana National Guard personnel are actively manning the Joint Operations Center and Tactical Aviation Cell.


THURSDAY, MAY 13

National Guard Support Continues to Build

1,304 National Guard personnel are currently supporting oil response—952 from the Louisiana National Guard are providing Command and Control and sandbagging support to St. Bernard and Plaquemines parishes, supporting marina operations and conducting HAZMAT training; 323 from the Alabama National Guard are deploying protective barriers around Dauphin Island and conducting sandbag and security operations; 25 from the Mississippi National Guard personnel are providing helicopter support and liaison officers to aid local officials with emergency response; and four from the Florida National Guard are performing liaison duties in support of the response effort to the Unified Command Center in Alabama and to its own emergency operations center in Tallahassee.


THURSDAY, MAY 20

Natural Resource Conservation Service Continues to Build Response

USDA’s Natural Resources Conservation Service has deployed personnel and multiple vessels to assist the Louisiana Department of Fisheries and Wildlife in monitoring oil making landfall in Terrebonne Bay and Breton Sound areas in Louisiana, and continues to assist the Louisiana National Guard with technical engineering recommendations for stabilizing beach and headland areas where sand and earthen material is being placed to plug openings to prevent the oil from entering the wetlands.



• Made a clear call to citizen volunteers to help where necessary.

MONDAY, MAY 3

More Than 2,000 Volunteers Are Trained To Assist

More than 2,000 volunteers receive training to assist in the response effort to that date. Volunteer recruitment efforts include outreach to local fishermen with boats, which can be used as vessels of opportunity to assist contractors in deploying boom.


• Given Cabinet officers an ultimatum: Get this under control in the next 30 days, or else.

TUESDAY, MAY 4

Cabinet Officials Brief Members of Congress

Secretary Salazar, Secretary of Commerce Gary Locke, Administrator Jackson, DHS Deputy Secretary Jane Holl Lute and Admiral Allen provided a bi-partisan and bi-cameral briefing to Congress on the administration’s all-hands-on-deck response to the spill. They updated members of Congress on the status of ongoing, coordinated response efforts in the Gulf coast states and delivered an update on BP’s mitigation plans for potentially impacted Gulf Coast states.

Cabinet Officials Host Daily Coordination Calls with the Gulf Coast State Governors

To ensure consistent coordination with the Gulf Coast states, Admiral Thad Allen, Secretaries Janet Napolitano and Ken Salazar, Administrator Lisa Jackson and NOAA Deputy Under Secretary Monica Medina began daily calls with the Governors from the five Gulf Coast states to provide updates on the response to the BP oil spill and answer any questions that arise. Governors Barbour, Crist, Jindal, Perry and Riley have been invited to participate in the daily calls moving forward. These daily calls are a follow up to the calls last Friday and Sunday between the Governors and the agencies involved in the federal response, as well as the calls last week between the President and the Governors and the President’s visit to the region on Sunday. These calls are intended to further the already unprecedented cooperation and focused effort between state and local officials and the federal government in response to this situation.


Maybe Gergen should have visited deepwaterhorizonresponse.com

The Ongoing Administration-Wide Response to the Deepwater Horizon BP Oil Spill



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. self delete
Edited on Mon May-24-10 11:27 PM by Raster
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. If you could recommend posts I would recommend the SHIT out of this one.
It should be its own thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #19
26. Reality: the catastrophe began on April 20
Edited on Tue May-25-10 12:22 AM by depakid
A month before "top scientists were engaged."

As Herbert notes, that ain't jump street.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 02:25 AM
Response to Reply #19
29. . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
24. When the adminstration's got Herbert on them, that's not a good sign
as to what a lot of other folks are thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 06:42 AM
Response to Reply #24
31. No, it isn't. And his column was quoted on CNN this morning
while an administration official was being grilled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
35. "BP’s interests are not the same as America’s interests."
Someone needs to tell the President
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC