Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bomb Designer, Mars Expert Sent by Obama to Fix Oil Spill -BLOOMBERG

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 12:30 PM
Original message
Bomb Designer, Mars Expert Sent by Obama to Fix Oil Spill -BLOOMBERG

** SO GLAD they are doing this and more are needed

http://preview.bloomberg.com/news/2010-05-14/obama-sends-bomb-inventor-mars-expert-to-fix-bp-oil-spill-in-mexican-gulf.html?xid=huffbloomberg

U.S. Energy Secretary Steven Chu signaled his lack of confidence in the industry experts trying to control BP Plc’s leaking oil well by hand-picking a team of scientists with reputations for creative problem solving.

Dispatched to Houston by President Barack Obama to deal with the crisis, Chu said Wednesday that five “extraordinarily intelligent” scientists from around the country will help BP and industry experts think of back-up plans to cut off oil from the well, leaking 5,000 feet (1,500 meters) below sea-level.

Members of the Chu team are credited with accomplishments including designing the first hydrogen bomb, inventing techniques for mining on Mars and finding a way to precisely position biomedical needles.

“I don’t think there is a lot of confidence in BP in Washington right now,” David Pursell, a managing director at Tudor Pickering Holt & Co. LLC in Houston, said by phone. Chu’s decision to bring in additional scientists may reflect that concern, he said.

BP’s effort to use robots on the seafloor to close off the well failed, and a 40-foot steel structure meant to cap the leak was scuttled when the containment box became clogged with an icy slush of seawater and gas. BP now is deliberating between using a smaller containment chamber to control the well or inserting a tube directly into the leaking pipe to channel the oil.

Chu said he’s tasked his team to develop “plan B, C, D, E and F” in addition to finding a way to stop the oil leak.

“Things are looking up, and things are getting much more optimistic,” the Nobel-prize winning physicist said after meeting with the scientists and BP in Houston Wednesday.

BP CEO Meeting

The group convened at BP’s command center in Houston yesterday, where they met with BP leadership, including Chief Executive Officer Tony Hayward, the Energy Department said. BP is using more than 500 specialists from almost 100 organizations and welcomes additional help, Jon Pack, a BP spokesman, said by phone.

Their exact activities are cloaked in secrecy. “We saw some confidential and proprietary information,” said one scientist on the team, Jonathan I. Katz, a physics professor at Washington University in St. Louis.

Katz’s early work focused on astrophysics, but now he consults on a wide variety of physics puzzles, he said. He is a member of the JASON group, a think tank dedicated to researching complex problems for the U.S. Government, including the Defense Department.

In a telephone interview from his home in Missouri, Katz skipped across topics: computer models for global warming, equality in college admissions and the Mpemba effect -- the observation that, in specific circumstances, warmer water freezes faster than colder water.

Provocative Thinking

Katz wrote articles that he has labeled as “thought- provoking” on his personal website, including, “Don’t Become a Scientist,” “In Defense of Homophobia” and “Why Terrorism is Important.”

“The best physicists have been very broad people,” he said.

Chu chose another JASON think tank member, Richard L. Garwin, for his oil spill taskforce. Garwin, 82, a physicist and IBM Fellow Emeritus, is a military-technology and arms-control consultant to the U.S. government. He helped design the first hydrogen bomb in 1951, according to the Los Alamos National Laboratory.

“To do interesting science, the whole point is not just to follow the beaten track, but find something new,” Freeman Dyson, another JASON member, said about Garwin.

Flaming Wells

Garwin held a 1991 symposium of academic scientists, explosives experts, firefighters and oilmen to grapple with how to stem oil flows from hundreds of wells Iraq set on fire in Kuwait during the Persian Gulf War, according to a summary of the event. Garwin declined to comment on the meeting in Houston, but confirmed his experience with Kuwait’s oil wells in an interview.

BP has described conditions around its leaking offshore well as resembling those in outer space. Chu selected one scientist with experience operating on Mars, George Cooper, a civil engineering professor at the University of California at Berkeley.

Cooper once worked with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration to modify mining techniques on earth for use on Mars, said Berkeley Professor Juan Pestana, who leads the GeoEngineering section in which Cooper is an emeritus professor.

Cooper did not respond to e-mails or telephone messages.

Chu also selected Alexander Slocum, a professor of mechanical engineering at Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge, who holds more than five dozen patents for devices related to biotechnology, robotics and computer science.

Nanotechnology, SCUBA Diving

On his website, Slocum describes his research interests delving into nanotechnology, precision engineering, “and staying down longer while SCUBA diving.” He did not respond to telephone calls or e-mails.

“He has a lot of creative ideas. One in 10 are really brilliant ideas, but nine are dumb,” said MIT professor Wai K. Cheng, a colleague in Slocum’s department. “You can’t miss that one that is brilliant.”

The team is rounded out by Tom Hunter from Sandia Laboratories, which conducts research for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration. Hunter has been with Sandia since 1967, and served as president of Sandia Corporation, which manages the lab, since 2005.

Chris Miller, a Sandia spokesman, said Hunter did not have time to comment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Aviation Pro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is why you elect competent people to government....
...so they can set the table for solving the impossible.

Anyone who remembers Apollo 13 knows this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtrockville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. rAmen
In sharp contrast to Condi Rice's statement: "There is no plan B."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Great news that Chu stepped in!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. It should never have come to this in the first place.
BP's "free market", "Private industry" -- they can hire the best and brightest :sarcasm: so why didn't they already have this contingency built into their project plans? <rhetorical question>


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Because those funds were alloted to campaign contributions to ladies in Alaska
etc!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagAss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. beats the shit out of "Heckuva job Brownie"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. I feel a glimmer of relief...
and I imagine those experts are already aware of what is lacking in BP's approach ... for instance why could they not predict the problem with hydrates??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Yep - a glimmer.
Lets hope it expands to more than just a glimmer.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. Maybe Obama learned his lesson from the financial bailout
Edited on Fri May-14-10 12:38 PM by rocktivity
Why allow the people who knowingly caused the problem to solve it? Cue the Vonage theme!

:woohoo:
rocktivity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NotThisTime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Glad they're there now, wish they were there 3 weeks ago
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 07:02 AM
Response to Reply #13
20. Maybe it is a matter of jurisdiction
I know it's a different agency but the EPA had/has to wait until the oil hits land before it can act on this oil crisis. Perhaps the same thing applies to the DOE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
9. Background: Steven Chu, Obama’s Remarkable Choice For Secretary Of Energy
http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2008/12/10/steven-chu-new-energy/

President-elect Barack Obama’s reported selection of Dr. Steven Chu as Secretary of Energy is a bold stroke to set the nation on the path to a clean energy economy. Chu, a Nobel Prize-winning physicist, is the sixth director of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, a Department of Energy-funded basic science research institution managed by the University of California. After moving to Berkeley Lab from Stanford University in 2004, Chu “has emerged internationally to champion science as society’s best defense against climate catastrophe.” As director, Chu has steered the direction of Berkeley Lab to addressing the climate crisis, pushing for breakthrough research in energy efficiency, solar energy, and biofuels technology.

At Berkeley Lab, Chu has won broad praise as an effective and inspirational leader. “When he was first here, he started giving talks about energy and production of energy,” Bob Jacobsen, a senior scientist at the Lawrence Berkeley Lab, told the San Francisco Chronicle in 2007. “He didn’t just present a problem. He told us what we could do. It was an energizing thing to see. He’s not a manager, he’s a leader.” In an interview with the Wonk Room, David Roland-Holst, an economist at the Center for Energy, Resources and Economic Sustainability at UC Berkeley, described Chu as a “very distinguished researcher” and “an extremely effective manager of cutting edge technology initiatives.” Roland-Holst praised Chu’s work at Lawrence Berkeley, saying “he has succeeded in reconfiguring it for a new generation of sustainable technology R&D, combining world class mainstream science with the latest initiatives in renewable energy and climate adaptation.”

Under Chu’s leadership, Berkeley Lab and other research institutions have founded the Energy Biosciences Institute with $500 million, ten-year grant from energy giant BP, and the Joint BioEnergy Institute with a $125 million grant from the Department of Energy. The BP deal has raised questions and protests about private corporations benefiting from public research. At the dedication of JBEI last Wednesday, Chu “recalled how the nation’s top scientists had rallied in the past to meet critical national needs, citing the development of radar and the atomic bomb during World War II”:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
11. "Their exact activities are cloaked in secrecy".... I say piss on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
12. flamingdem,
Please be aware that our rules regarding copyrighted material require you to limit your copy to four paragraphs or less with a link.

Thanks,

cbayer
DU Moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. understood nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happyslug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
15. Have they already determined a Nuke has to be used???
Edited on Fri May-14-10 01:09 PM by happyslug
This does NOT sound like a search for a plan, but a search for a COVER for a plan no one really wants, but has to be done. A nuke could provide the power to sell this "leak", literally by putting so much pressure on the ocean flow that the entire hole will collapse. The Russians are suppose to have done this in 1966, and since that was AFTER the adoption of the Nuclear Non=proliferation Treaty (which included an ban on any Nuclear blast on the surface, in the Air, In the ocean or in Space i.e. permitted only deep underground Nuclear denotations) the US would have had to been told of that blast and approved it as a "non-test" i.e. a surface blast that was NOT a violation of the test ban treaty.

Sorry, sounds like a cover story, someone in the Department of Energy has determined that a huge blast is what is needed and that only way to get such a blast quickly would be a Nuke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. An explosion is surely last resort but a bomb expert is involved
so who knows what they are considering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adsos Letter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
17. “We saw some confidential and proprietary information,”
it would be interesting to know what that involved; info dealing with BP systems, perhaps?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
18. K & R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 05:55 AM
Response to Original message
19. . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC