Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Elizabeth R. to Dubya: "None of your business"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 08:32 PM
Original message
Elizabeth R. to Dubya: "None of your business"
Edited on Fri May-04-07 08:33 PM by CatWoman
:rofl:

Kristof reports that in 1991, President George H.W. Bush invited Queen Elizabeth to the White House for a state banquet.

Barbara Bush introduced young George to the Queen. George W. told Her Majesty that his new cowboy boots were embroidered with the phrase "God Save the Queen." Barbara then explained that it was fear of such a remark that caused her to seat young George a safe distance from the Queen.

George then told the Queen that apparently he was the Bush family's black sheep. "Who's yours?" he queried. According to Kristof, Queen Elizabeth smiled and retorted, "None of your business."


http://www.midlandtexas.gov/midland/bush/bush.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GRLMGC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. So she was well aware that he was a tool from 1991
That makes for a good start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Perhaps we are ashamed of our NAZI uncle?
The royal turd had to resign the throne, not for his American divorcee squeeze, but for his affinity for all things Reich.

The Nazi Roots of the House of Windsor

http://american_almanac.tripod.com/naziroot.htm


Then again, the crazy monkey's uncle was one with the NAZIs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darth_Kitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. Liz is also only the de facto monarch...........
her ancestors assumed a throne that technically wasn't theirs to begin with, but I guess better a foreign interloper than a catholic on the throne. ;)

Her uncle was a weak man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. How is that, DK?
I'm not aware of this bit of history. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #18
27. her line is german--Saxe-Coburg and Gotha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manifestor_of_Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 03:44 AM
Response to Reply #27
39. Yes, her family used to be the House of Hanover. Prince Philip Battenberg.
And Phillip's family name was Battenberg; they changed it to Mountbatten.

Lilly Langtry had an affair with Louis Battenberg.

When Edward the VIII was asked why he spoke German, he said, "Ist mein Mutterspracht". It's my mother tongue. They generally all spoke German thru the first part of the 20th Century.

My dad's theory as to why Edward VIII resigned in 1936 was that he saw WW II coming, and didn't want to send troops to fight his cousins.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #39
42. The Hanovers were as legimitate as most of them
The House of Stuart wasn't particularly prolific, so when both of James II's daughters (Queen Mary and then Queen Anne) died without surviving offspring, the British had a choice between accepting James' son, who was a Catholic, or reaching all the way back and over to the descendants of James I's daughter, who'd married the Prince of Bohemia. George I may have been a German, but he was the closest legitimate Protestant heir.

If Edward VIII considered German his mother tongue, it was because of his German father, Prince Albert, who'd married Queen Victoria, and not because of his Hanoverian lineage from 200 years earlier.

The Tudors, on the other hand, had a lot less to go on. Henry VII had no real right to the throne at all -- just some hashed-up claim involving his mother's second husband -- though he did marry a princess from the House of York, thereby insuring his descendants would at least have some royal blood.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darth_Kitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #18
47. Well, to make a long story short.....
James II, who was catholic, had a son and heir with his second wife.

His daughter from his first marriage and her husband, William of Orange, were "invited" over from Holland to assume the throne.

This was in 1688. William and Mary ursurped the english throne. Mary died a few years later and William was sole ruler.

Fast forward to 1701, James II dies in exile in France. He did have a son to succeed him, but parliament passes the Act of Settlement, which bars catholics from succeeding to the English throne. 1702 William dies and James' daughter Anne succeeds. (but she has a brother, go figure) Anne was a bit of a dolt and a malicious character who betrayed her father probably even more than her sister and husband did.

Anyways, Anne dies in 1714 without any heirs, all of her children dying very young.
The throne goes to George I, bypassing dozens of catholics, including James' son.

To this day, no catholic can succeed to the english throne.


My interest in this (a bit of a history buff) is that James II was actually trying to bring about toleration for catholics and members of other religions but some members of the establishment saw this as too threatening. I've even read that he even made a speech in which he compared relgious intolerance to racial intolerance, that why should anybody be discriminated against for either their beliefs or skin colour.
But to this day, a lot of historians portray him as a bigot.

Well, that's that in a nutshell, I suppose. :)




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave_p Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 04:17 AM
Response to Reply #14
41. It's theirs
Parliament gave them the throne. It can take it away just as easily.

In fact English royal history's full of killings, depositions and usurpations. The notion that the present bunch have any less "right" than most of their predecessors is a bit far-fetched.

They're there because they more or less do the job Brits breed them for. If they don't, they'll be out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darth_Kitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #41
48. The reason their ancestors assumed the throne.........
changed a lot of things. In a roundabout way, what happened in Europe centuries ago had a lot to do with how our own countries (U.S. and Canada) were founded and formed.

But don't ask me for particulars, I'm still figuring it out myself. ;)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nemo137 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #14
49. If I remember correctly, there hasn't been an "English" monarch in centuries
You had the Plantagenets, who were French, then the Tudors, who were Welsh, then the Stuarts, who were Scottish, then the Hannovers, who were German, then Saxe-Coburg-Gotha/Windsor/Mountbatten line, who are also German. Granted, the circumstances around James' being dispossesed were a bit shadier than some of the others, but given the English paranoia about being returned to Catholicism/ put under Spanish control, pretty much understandable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. And Mr. Class and Grace is now the president
I'm sure the Queen has no plans for dinner at the WH... at least I hope not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greatauntoftriplets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. There is a white tie state dinner Monday night....
for the queen.

:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GRLMGC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I'm looking forward to the photographs
that come out of that one. Oh the embarassment!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greatauntoftriplets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I wonder which curtains Pickles will wear....
And what craphead will slop on his white tie?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GRLMGC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. It's guaranteed to be comedy gold nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poverlay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
33. That curtains remark is bloody hilarious. I almost fell off the couch... Thanks:) nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. OMG! You're right! and he's getting etiquette lessons
http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/05/04/america/04queen.php

I'm sure Ms. Manners is not answering her phone, suddenly out of the country and running as far and as fast as she can like the devil from holy water!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mohinoaklawnillinois Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Hey Sheila, now I'm not all that fond of the Brit Royal Family, but
the fact that Liz has sit through a dinner with that cretin and his Stepford wife, even makes me cringe...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greatauntoftriplets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. I am not either....
But I'd love to be a fly on the wall. As someone responded to me downthread, it should be comedy gold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mohinoaklawnillinois Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #16
24. How bout it, I can't wait for pictures of it and the captioning that will
follow. I'm sure I'll be :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greatauntoftriplets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Let us hope so....
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. Oh Catwoman! This is too funny! I just posted an OP with the same thing! Didn't see your post!
:rofl:

I love this story!

Going to self-delete my post now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. our wacky, wacky president!!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #15
43. lol!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. Young George?? He must have been about 45 in 1991
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrazyOrangeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
29. yup.
welcome to the Twilight Zone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
11. she might say "we've checked -- it's still you" (apparently they are distantly related)
Okay, so she's very polite and she probably wouldn't tell him that. But she might be thinking it .... especially when Georgie compares himself to Winston Churchill. She actually knew that man -- and George W. Bush definitely ISN'T Winston Churchill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
13. Maybe he'll give EII a shoulder massage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
17. What the hell is the Queen of England
even doing over here visiting the chimphouse?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElizabethDC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. A diplomatic visit
she's technically England's Head of State.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. Aren't they suppose to be
distantly related?

Queen of England trying to bring some diplomacy to the frat house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
19. That's why he didn't want to have a white-tie dinner for the old queen n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. Still holding his pissy little
grudge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kadie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
20. My husband just reminded me of this story: Queen's fury as Bush goons wreck garden
GROUND FARCE 1
Queen's fury as Bush goons wreck garden
Exclusive By Terry O'Hanlon 23/11/2003

THE Queen is furious with President George W. Bush after his state visit caused thousands of pounds of damage to her gardens at Buckingham Palace.

snip...
The rotors of the President's Marine Force One helicopter and two support Black Hawks damaged trees and shrubs that had survived since Queen Victoria's reign.

And Bush's army of clod-hopping security service men trampled more precious and exotic plants.

The Queen's own flock of flamingoes, which security staff insisted should be moved in case they flew into the helicopter rotors, are thought to be so traumatised after being taken to a "place of safety" that they might never return home.

The historic fabric of the Palace was also damaged as high-tech links were fitted for the US leader and his entourage during his three-day stay with the Queen.

The Palace's head gardener, Mark Lane, was reported to be in tears when he saw the scale of the damage.

"The Queen has every right to feel insulted at the way she has been treated by Bush," said a Palace insider.

snip...
The Americans made alterations to accommodate specialised equipment. The mass of gadgetry meant the Royals couldn't get a decent TV picture during the visit.

http://www.sundaymirror.co.uk/news/content_objectid=13652625_method=full_siteid=106694_headline=-GROUND-FARCE-1-name_page.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #20
28. i wonder why she does`t demand security like his?
after all the never sets on the empire...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrazyOrangeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #20
32. yep. that's what she's mad about.
tearing up elderly ladies' gardens should be a capital crime.

off with that pointed head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #20
34. Just what you'd expect from our dumb-ass country that has damaged
priceless archeological sites in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacefreak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
22. I'm sure she is even fonder of him.
Remember the last time he stayed at the Palace? He made outrageous security demands & tore up the Royal lawn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #22
30. Yeah, but he did get dressed for dinner


though I wonder if he had his boots on.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Decruiter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. "You know, I have a throne, too!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
symbolman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 03:36 AM
Response to Reply #30
37. Aren't they worried that
someone will Mistake Laura for a COUCH and SIT on her?

Best to keep her moving, stand over by the drapes where she'll be safe, camoflauge for the rest of her outfit :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #30
46. Larva and Phil have the same glassy-pasted Xanax smiles...
and the Queen is telling chimp not to pick his nose again at dinner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bumblebee1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 02:25 AM
Response to Original message
35. The bigger question is
How will Prince Phillip deal with *? I understand he doesn't suffer fools gladly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GRLMGC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 02:29 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. Check these out
They're a good imagining of what might have happened when Bush paid a state visit to the UK in 2003. Frighteningly authentic. I wonder what Bush's journals will end up looking like when they are released. Probably like these except in crayon.

Day One: http://www.deadbrain.co.uk/news/article_2003_11_19_5513...
Day Two: http://www.deadbrain.co.uk/news/article_2003_11_20_4406...
Day Three: http://www.deadbrain.co.uk/news/article_2003_11_21_0357...
Day Four: http://www.deadbrain.co.uk/news/article_2003_11_22_3647...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manifestor_of_Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 03:41 AM
Response to Original message
38. This may be as much fun to watch as Charles and Camilla when they were here.
I remember those horrendous pictures where Charles looked like a vampire goosing Laura and Laura looked positively manic!! The rusty orange dress and the way over the top golden topaz necklace.

Camilla looked positively classy in black velvet and a not terribly flashy but undoubtedly high quality necklace with a large tear drop diamond.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 03:47 AM
Response to Original message
40. LOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!
:rofl: ... lower than a court jester! :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #40
44. Swampy!!!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maine_raptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
45. Will George try to put Her Majesty at ease on Monday night
by giving her one of his famous back-rubs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC