Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Notorious Irish pedophile priest discovered working with kids in Holland

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 11:17 AM
Original message
Notorious Irish pedophile priest discovered working with kids in Holland


http://www.irishcentral.com/story/news/periscope/notorious-irish-pedophile-priest-discovered-working-with-kids-in-holland-92049089.html


A notorious Irish pedophile priest who abused children for many years in America has been discovered helping out as a church deacon in Rotterdam under an assumed name and working a shelter for abused women and their children.

Father Oliver O'Grady served as a priest at St. Anne's Catholic Church in Lodi, California from 1971 to 1978. He later served at Church of the Presentation in Stockton, California, Sacred Heart Catholic Church in Turlock, California, St. Andrew's Parish in San Andreas, California, and St. Anthony's Catholic Church in Hughson, California.

In 1993 he was convicted on four counts of "lewd and lascivious acts" on two minors, the brothers John and James Howard, and was sentenced to 14 years in prison. Attorney Jeff Anderson said the Howards were repeatedly molested between 1978 and 1991, from age three to 13. Anderson claimed church officials knew that O'Grady had abused children as early as 1976 and 1984 but had done nothing. Police had been informed of earlier charges and had declined to prosecute.

In 1998 a civil jury ordered the Catholic Diocese of Stockton to pay US$30 million in damages to the brothers. A judge later reduced the amount to $7 million.

O'Grady was paroled from prison in 2000 after serving only seven years, and went to Ireland after being deported from the United States.

He claimed to have been himself molested by a priest at the age of 10, and that he was involved in sexual abuse in his own family, both as perpetrator and victim. One of his victims was just nine months old.
-snip-
---------------------------


there is a picture of the creep

child sexual abuse is like the saying 'what goes around comes around', sadly to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. If someone put a bullet into this creep, he couldn't hurt any more kids.
Gene pool's closed. Everybody out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'm starting to feel sorry for John Q. Average Catholic.
it's got to be harder and harder to defend this crap. I have two friends who are big Catholics and we just cannot talk religion anymore. The entire religion is run by a former Nazi Youth member, pedophile hiding, __________.

Or not.

If my __________ (anything) was run like, or by people who...... I would leave said group.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. The Church kicked him out of the Priesthood long ago, and he's been to prison.
He was able to get a part-time position helping as a Deacon by using a false identity.

I don't know what else the Church could have done in this case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foxfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
3. And how long before he's caught with his finger in a tyke?
Not to minimize the gravity of the situation. He probably was molested as a child. That in no way mitigates his own behavior; rather, it underscore the multigenerational horror of child sexual abuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. How did this happen? And are they absolutely certain it is the same man? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. Sinead O'Connor is taking names and kicking butt.
She's done many interviews and is, in my mind, the Joan d'Arc on this issue. I would recommend that anyone interested check them out. Her visit with Rachel can be found in the Political Videos forum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. I am so impressed with her advocacy on this issue.
Her interview with Rachel was amazing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. He is no longer a priest -- he was "defrocked" years ago.
Under an assumed name he'd managed to get a job helping out as a deacon. In addition to working at the shelter, he was also working at a fast food restaurant in a capacity that let him help with children's parties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. O'Grady was abusing children from '76 and not prosecuted til '93 . . .
Edited on Mon Apr-26-10 07:36 PM by defendandprotect
while the Church officials knew and police failed to prosecute --

In 1993 he was convicted on four counts of "lewd and lascivious acts" on two minors, the brothers John and James Howard, and was sentenced to 14 years in prison. Attorney Jeff Anderson said the Howards were repeatedly molested between 1978 and 1991, from age three to 13. Anderson claimed church officials knew that O'Grady had abused children as early as 1976 and 1984 but had done nothing. Police had been informed of earlier charges and had declined to prosecute.

There were rather famous cases in Louisiana where Harry Connick, Jr's father who was an official
in government/police enforcement also kept much of the sexual abuse from being known and/or prosecuted! An avid Catholic, he destroyed many of the records, as I recall it.

Police officers have also been known to be aiding "Pro-life" violence at women's clinics.


Meanwhile, here's an interesting question . . .

Also : The right-wing "Family Research Council" notes/confirms findings that "almost all child sexual abuse is committed by men."



And that's HETEREOSEXUAL MEN who are 100X more likely to sexual abuse children than homosexual
males.

Q: Why does the Catholic Church have a male priesthood and male-supremacist teachings?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. HIs case is old news. He went to prison in 1993 and hasn't been a priest since then. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. A priest who raped babies will never be "old news" ... I assure you--!!
No crack at answering the question re male-supremacist religion and

all-male Vatican?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Why should I try to defend the male priesthood? I've always disagreed with it.
But unlike conservative Catholics and many non-Catholic progressive Dems, I think it's quite possible to be Catholic and not agree with all of the policies and decrees of the hierarchy -- in fact, to work to change them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Good for you -- keep at it --
:)

Recovering Catholic here -- !!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. On and on and on and on . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Drip. Drip. Drip. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
10. He's the one in the documentary 'deliver us from evil'. he's a baby raper
Yes, he raped babies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Never caught up with that documentary . . . thanks --
I've generally been opposed to any law which reverses the notion of "time served"

being payment for one's crime --

But obviously pedophiles are different -- this certainly looks like a mental disease

and since it overwhelmingly is crime by hetereosexual males, it should be seriously

studied!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dorian Gray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
12. I have a friend
who attends that parish in Holland, and they found out just this past week that this ex-priest (an active parishoner considered a friend to many) had this sordid past. It was shocking to everyone. Horrible horrible horrible story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC