Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Vanishing Liberal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-10 03:20 PM
Original message
The Vanishing Liberal
Kevin Baker writes in the April 2010 issue of Harper's, an intensely sobering analysis. (subscription req'd)





The vanishing liberal:

How the left learned to be helpless




(from near the end of the piece)


.....

And so we arrive at the present moment, in which the people are not asked to do anything. The fine words and able presentation of Obama, whether delivered at West Point or on Wall Street or in the well of the House of Representatives, obscure the fact that they are subtle parodies of a century of liberal argument. Whereas the Populists’ soapbox lecturers or the Progressives’ magazine exposés or FDR in his radio “fireside chats” explained the way of the world to the people and argued for why and how that way must change, Obama—like most Democratic leaders—concedes that the way of the world is wrong but tells us why it must stay that way because, some time in the past, powerful interests decreed it so.

Thus we are told that single-payer or a public option may be a good idea but that private insurance companies are simply too well–ensconced for reform. Afghanistan may be hopeless, but we have already committed to it. The power of the people is never activated, nothing much is asked or required of us, even as thugs overrun congressional town-hall meetings.

Instead, the party that claims to represent all progressive interests in this country proceeds with its impervious, self-interested agenda.
The administration’s stated priorities for the near future are to balance the budget before a deep recession has abated and to commit the nation to a long-running war in a dysfunctional Asian country that we neither understand nor care about—thereby promising to repeat, simultaneously, the two worst mistakes made by liberal presidents in the past seventy-five years. As for the long term, the White House will form a commission bent on cutting “entitlements,” such as Social Security and Medicare, that are the bedrock of retired Americans’ prosperity.

Obama is an adroit politician and, like the last adroit Democratic president, he may be able to secure another term in the White House. Perhaps he will even be able to keep a Democratic majority in Congress, though this now seems unlikelier by the day. But to treat this as a triumph of activism is to say that a prisoner retains free will because he is able to stay in his cell. Obama, the congressional Democrats, and most of our politicians at every level now maneuver within political confines defined by financial and military interests they cannot conceive of challenging. Perversely, our ruling elite today is one of unparalleled diversity, and includes unprecedented numbers of women, minorities, and individuals who have worked their way up to power on brains and determination alone, usually without having inherited connections or wealth. It is a meritocracy much like the one long envisioned by many liberal reformers—and it has decided to capitulate, reap its considerable rewards, and draw the ladder up after it.




And this is exactly what has happened to We the People. Looking at this Congressional body, we have seen that the Serpent has two heads, yet they move sinuously with each other as they forcibly extract the life-sustaining desires of all people and their families to thrive and to find happiness.

And simply for wanting these things, for questioning the glaring inconsistencies in the actions of members of our government, everyday people with conscience are reviled.

Because they question. Because they see the injustice. Because a democracy cannot survive without justice and equality.


We the People are reviled by those who are supposed to represent our interests.




Baker concludes:



Who will challenge this shining fortress upon a hill? The right-wing pseudo-Populists who have devoured the Republican Party may win some victories in the short run. But the Tea Party and its fellow travelers have already become a jointly owned subsidiary of News Corp. and the likes of Dick Armey’s FreedomWorks lobby. (To understand just how fraudulent the movement is, one need only look at the $549-a-seat price tag for tickets to its first convention, and the $100,000 speaker’s fee paid to Sarah Palin. So much for box socials and sing-alongs.) Right-wing Populism is anyway inherently contradictory, a demand that the state recede to a size that will leave its citizens utterly defenseless against the gigantic forces at loose in the world today. No one is going to abolish the Federal Reserve, or the income tax, or Social Security and Medicare; if they did, small businesses and working people would be trampled beneath the corporate entities bent on their exploitation. The counter-Populism of the right is the prisoner’s last, despairing option, to move from learned helplessness to suicide.


Coming to power when he did, with the political skills and the majorities he possesses, Barack Obama squandered an almost unprecedented opportunity. But it is increasingly clear that he never intended to challenge the power structure he had so skillfully penetrated. With the recent Supreme Court ruling that corporations are, once more, people, American democracy has snapped shut again—the great, forced opening of the past 130 years has ended. There is no longer any meaningful reformist impulse left in our politics. The idea of modern American liberalism has vanished among our elite, and simply voting for one man or supporting one of the two major parties will not restore it. The work will have to be done from the ground up, and it will have to be done by us.






Truly, it will have to be done by us.



(bold type added)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-10 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Horseshit.
Edited on Fri Mar-26-10 03:25 PM by RUMMYisFROSTED
Dichotomy between voters and votees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-10 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. pernicious and patronizing now passes as intensely sobering lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-10 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. A major re-organization is coming
If the democrats keep moving to the right, they're gonna leave so much room on their left, someone is going to slip in and fill the void. As has happened in the past, it could be the GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-10 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. What a great quote:
"Whereas the Populists’ soapbox lecturers or the Progressives’ magazine exposés or FDR in his radio “fireside chats” explained the way of the world to the people and argued for why and how that way must change, Obama—like most Democratic leaders—concedes that the way of the world is wrong but tells us why it must stay that way because, some time in the past, powerful interests decreed it so."

Its a major problem. The Democrats are seeking success by working within the confines of the political spectrum when in charge, and the Republicans are seeking success by shifting the political spectrum continually to the right when given the opportunity. In any case, despite arguments of pragmatism, the people are continually more and more left behind

But instead of addressing and discussing these tendencies, it is easier by people on all sides of the spectrum to label it as "horseshit"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smalll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-10 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. Commit to a "war in a dysfunctional Asian country that we neither understand nor care about"
Nice one, Neville!

"...a quarrel in a far-away country between people of whom we know nothing.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-10 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yep. Obama caved to the RW and the Pentagon for our new Vietnam.
But, he's a "liberal".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-10 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Please elaborate. -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-10 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. I read that article, it's total bullshit
There has been an aggressive war against liberals since the 60s. We were first banished from power in 1969 and we've been systematically been banished from the media and from reasoned political discourse since then.

We might yet live to see a similar war against conservatives for the very reason we experienced being crushed over the last 41 years: the shift in power is driving the extremists completely mad and now they're turning everyone against the movement.

It will take some time for the corporate news monopolies to catch on, if they ever do.

However, the last thing liberals have been is helpless. If that had ever been the case, the country would have seen mass suicides and there would be no push to reform much of anything right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-10 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. "the party that claims to represent all progressive interests in this country proceeds
with its impervious, self-interested agenda"
bango!

the party veered to the right under Raygun and ran right again under *. however, anyone pointing this out is attacked because
% McCain would've been SO much worse, and the GOP ruins reform, so vote for anyDem--or else!
% the party is actually progressive, either because a) they toss us a few bones, and a little good always outweighs tremendous helpings of bad, b) nobody's perfect and Wellstone supported DOMA, or c) you're a vile Naderite/Henry Wallace voter who'll never be satisfied, so I can safely ignore your criticisms

reformism and liberalism will also have to avoid using the libertarians' policies: we want a government that works to help the people and environment, not guns in retirement homes, Six Flags, and Starbucks; even if they scream that "Congress doesn't represent me," that's only because it passed things like the Endangered Species Act and race questions on the Census form

however, I have to partly disagree with the last paragraph: Congress may be the furthest right it was since Truman and McCarthy purged the left a la Stalin, but a lot of people are getting informed and righteously angry, in ways opposite the teabaggers: they understand that big government is all that can block big business, and that the way to face a crisis isn't to open fire against wolves or Mexican migrants
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-10 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
10. "But it is increasingly clear that he never intended to challenge the power structure ..."
The mainstream establishment deems such reps as "electable."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-10 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
11. I posted this last week!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC