Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is it time to legalize marijuana?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Uben Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 06:48 AM
Original message
Is it time to legalize marijuana?
I just read this article-

http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/03/23/synthetic.marijuan...

It's about synthetic marijuana. Kids are smoking spices laced with chemicals that mimic the high of pot. This stuff is legal and sold as incense, but the target is for kids to smoke it. It's quite obvious that teens will find something to get high with, so why not give them something that has health benefits rather than something that likely harms them? For decades, the government has been trying to quell pot use by using the same fear tactics they use to sell us bogus wars. Don't pay any attention to the facts, trust us!

No one has ever died from smoking pot, and just about every claim that has been made against it has been debunked. So, I think it is high time (pun intended) to legalize it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 06:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, or at least take REAL measures to decriminalize it.
:smoke: :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 07:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. Massachusetts decriminalized MJ.
If you're caught with one oz. or less, the cops can take your stash and give you a ticket for a $100 fine. I think we should work on lowering the fine but the state's finances really suck so I doubt that will happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #10
21. legalize it and tax the sale of it, as with alcohol
and then, hey, you've got a revenue stream for the state! and a productive agricultural enterprise! Current black market drug traffickers would probably be upset, but they'd get over it...maybe they could become happy, socially integrated entrepreneurs instead of worrying about getting arrested all the time.

And there would be all kinds of other potential benefits from this amazingly useful plant.

I think drug prohibition is stupid in general, but extra stupid when it comes to marijuana.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 06:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. long past time to decriminalize.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Christa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. Yes. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. There is none one single chance in all of creation that Democrats would take up that cause
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flaneur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #4
30. Perhaps that will change once states start voting for it.
Legalization will be on the ballot in California in November.

Legalization might be on the ballot in Oregon in November.

Legalization will likely be on the ballot in Washington in 2012.

Legalization will likely be on the ballot in Nevada in 2012.

The pot train is picking up speed. Democrats need to hop on board or get out of the way to avoid being run over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #30
57. Colorado is also trying to legalize marijuana
Denver is legal up to 1 oz, and Mayor Hickenlooper (who is running for Gov this November) has made marijuana possession arrests a very low priority.

MMJ is legal here. We have tons of dispensaries, which the state is trying to regulate (and hoping they will fail because it's a stupid legislation) Recently, the City Council limited dispensaries to 6 patients (or something like that)

Breckinridge (a ski town) is also legal up to 1 oz as well, but prohibited smoking during skiing.

Hawkeye-X
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buddyblazon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #57
59. No...
Edited on Wed Mar-24-10 04:28 PM by Buddyblazon
they TRIED to limit dispensaries to 6 patients. I'm pretty sure it got shot down.

The one part of the new legislation they're trying to push (they're always trying to push something new on the MMJ industry) is to require dispensaries to grow at least 70% of their product...something that will limit small growers because they tend to sell their "overage" to the dispensaries. $1000 a quarter pound on average.

Really, the big California growers that swept in to the state when the original limit for patients for dispensaries was lifted, have lots of money...and lots of lobbyists...and lots of politicians. What they're trying to do is push out the Coloradans with start up grow businesses and keep it all to themselves. They want to "Wal-Mart" the industry.

That's why it's important for you to ensure you and your friends with their cards always buy from Colorado growers. To be exact, people you know are Coloradans. That have had roots here. Not Californians living in Colorado because they saw a new market they could expose and corner.

This industry is doing a lot to keep Colorado from going over the economic brink like so many other cities/states. The amount of jobs it's creating is large. Grow shops, dispensaries, big growers, contractors to build grow rooms (i.e. electricians, carpenters)...they all need workers. A lot of people are getting their cards and creating start up businesses by growing.

It's really a wonderful time in Colorado for Marijuana. It's also being threatened by out of staters with greed on their mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
5. They're smoking laced herbs, not laced spices; the "Spice" brand is a reference to fiction.
(the science fiction novel "Dune" if I'm not mistaken)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerDittoHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
6. The way you're presenting this, NO. I do NOT support making pot more available to kids.
>It's quite obvious that teens will find something to get high with, so why not give them something that has health benefits rather than something that likely harms them

No way. This is not the way to sell it or do it.

IMO, one of the reasons I would support legalization is GREATER control, as the systems we have today are broken and anyone can get it

Kids *can* get booze, but IT'S ILLEGAL. I'd want something of equal / greater control in place for pot as for booze.

Pot IS addictive in that if it's THERE people will smoke it, and there are things you SIMPLY CAN'T DO AS WELL WHILE HIGH - like STUDY MATH. (I know this from direct experience)

I want the same kinds of laws in place for legal pot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 07:07 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. "Pot IS addictive in that if it's THERE people will smoke it"
kind of like milk and oj in my house. The horrors.

Yes of course marijuana sales should be regulated as we regulate alcohol and tobacco. But pot simply is not addictive, sorry if the brainwashing has confused your thinking. Rinse that brain and try again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerDittoHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #9
27. Do you think I haven't smoked pot?
I'm glad we agree pot should be legal, regulated, and yes, taxed, but every word I wrote was from direct experience.

I wasn't using the medical definition of addiction.

I was using both the first and second dictionary definitions of addiction.

http://freedictionary.org/?Query=addiction

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EOTE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #27
33. The first definition does not apply.
The second one certainly can depending upon the person. But then again, the second definition could apply to just about anything that a person really likes, so it doesn't mean much at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
piratefish08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 07:14 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. there. changed a few words.
A Twinkie is addictive in that if it's THERE people will eat it, and there are things you SIMPLY CAN'T DO AS WELL WHILE Morbidly Obese - like move around.

I want the same kinds of laws in place for legal Twinkies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #6
24. Pot IS not addictive.
You can build a dependency, but it is not addictive.

The only people that push the addictive crap are the people that make a fortune in the drug "rehabilitation" industry and fools.

Heroin is addictive, meth is addictive, any number of prescription drugs are addictive.

Pot it NOT addictive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerDittoHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #24
28. I wasn't using the medical definition of addiction - check the REGULAR dictionary...
I wasn't using the medical definition of addiction.

I was using both *these* first and second dictionary definitions of addiction. (which is common usage, IMO):

http://freedictionary.org/?Query=addiction

BTW: compare that with the 2nd definition of dependency, which you make such a distinction with:

http://freedictionary.org/?Query=dependency&button=Sear...

I don't see much difference there.

OK READ THIS:

If you look up THIS definition of addition:
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/addiction

YOU'RE RIGHT. It's NOT a "habit forming substance" in and of itself.

I am for legalizing, but I want it CONTROLLED like alcohol (which is addicting in every sense).

I've smoked WAY TOO MUCH to stand by and listen to suggestions that it's like chewing gum and that kids should be allowed to have access to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #28
40. Who here is advocating giving pot to kids?
Not me. Not anyone I know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerDittoHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. Did you read the original post?
QUOTE FROM THE ORIGINAL POST IN THIS THREAD:

"...It's quite obvious that teens will find something to get high with, so why not give them something that has health benefits rather than something that likely harms them?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EOTE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #6
32. Your experiences do not jibe with everyone else's.
First of all, pot is THERE, and just about any kid can get their hands on it if they wanted it. Also, for many people, pot allows them to think differently and better. As far as math goes, I took college level calculus in high school and a little toke helped me greatly. I've been tested and I'm in the top percentile in terms of mathematics ability and spatial relationships. And I'm quite fuzzy as to your definition of addictive. Addictive how? Psychologically? Physically? There are no true withdrawal symptoms for pot. So it basically boils down to if a person likes the effects that pot provides, he/she will try to seek it out. The same goes for anything.

I'm quite sure you would get that greater control under legalization in the U.S. You ask any high schooler nowadays which is easier to obtain, alcohol or pot, 4 times out of 5 they're going to tell you pot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bamacrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #6
37. With that logic food is addictive as well as water, air, soap and shampoo.
I don't think kids should smoke and legalizing it would help that. In Holland they have seen a large decrease in teen pot use since its legalization. It's easier for kids to get weed than alcohol because it isn't regulated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #37
63. Omigod! A multiple substance abuser! I knew it! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #6
38. I think it's important that everyone understand the illogic and incoherence that motivates
the Drug Warriors. The post to which I respond is a prime example of utter incoherence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leftist Agitator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
50. Forget it...
Edited on Wed Mar-24-10 03:12 PM by Leftist Agitator
You aren't worth my time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
51. many things legal are actually addictive, yet pot isn't
those who feel the need for a crutch, will do so with alcohol and others substances of choice. Not everyone wants to smoke pot, nor does everyone need to or inclined to become addicted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #6
73. Availability and reduced capacity does not equal addiction
An addictive drug alters your brain's chemistry so as to create a need for the drug. Pot doesn't do that. OTOH, meth, crack, heroin, alcohol and nicotine all do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
7. At least 30 years overdue.
Thanks Ron and Nancy! You fuckwits. Just say no to stupid laws and prisons filled with non-criminals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
8. YES!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
11. Legalization Soon to be on the Calif Nov Ballot...hopefully it makes it
:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uben Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
13. Legalize and tax
It would be a big addition to the states coffers, bringing in tens of millions of dollars.

The end to marijuana prohibition would merely require the rescheduling of marijuana from a Schedule I to a non-scheduled drug, similar to alcohol, nicotine, caffeine or ibuprofen. Once the federal government had decriminalized marijuana, all states would have the option of legalizing it. States could either be "smoky" or "clear," similar to "wet" and "dry" locales after Prohibition ended in the 1930s. In addition, counties or municipalities could be "clear" jurisdictions if they so chose.

In times like these when states are looking for ways to increase revenues, this seems like a viable alternative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
14. YES!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTenthofOnePercent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
15. ... Relpy hazy, ask again tomorrow (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
16. It was never time to make it illegal in the first place..
And it will never, ever be truly legal in the USA, the very best it's possible to hope for is some half assed decriminalization that basically makes it like alcohol was during Prohibition.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EOTE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #16
36. Why so negative?
I truly hope that you're wrong in that regard. On a state level, many states already have decriminalization and every couple of years a few more hop on that train. This year, for the first time since marijuana prohibition, it's looking like there's a decent chance that out and out legalization is going to occur, perhaps in California. I'd imagine once one or two states legalize outright, that many more will be on board once they see the revenue they're missing out on. What is it that you know that makes you so pessimistic in this regard?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
17. Yes. It should never have been made illegal in the first place.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Therellas Donating Member (216 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
18. naah......
Edited on Wed Mar-24-10 07:59 AM by Therellas
how would we keep the prisons full?
lets just keep pumping out the synthetics.
there must be something wrong with these children.
maybe theses kids needed some nice strong antidepressants too.

good stuff.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
19. way past time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lib2DaBone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
20. Its a victimless crime. Disban Corrupt DEA... bring those dollars home
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
22. Long-long-long l o n g overdue ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
23. No! It's waaaaay past time to legalize it. They should have legalized it in the 1960's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uben Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. I knew a guy....
...who spent 7 yrs in prison for possessing 2 ounces back in the sixties! Dayum! He died 30 yrs ago.
Spent a quarter of his life in prison for mere possession. Nowadays, 2 ounces will get you probation for first offenders. Times are a changin, but not fast enough.

One in eight prisoners are there for marijuana related offenses. It costs us $40K/yr to incarcerate these people at an annual cost of over a billion dollars. Decriminalization could save us that billion and add more billions with regulation and taxation.

So, why is alcohol legal? Revenue! The same reason we should at least decriminalize pot. Take the profit out of the smugglers pocket and put it in government coffers. This would also help ease the problems on the Mexican borders with the drug cartels killing everybody over territorial issues.

But, these are liberal ideas, and you couldn't sell a hundred dollar bill for $5 to republican if it had a liberal's face on it! Until they shun their ignorance, we will continue to follow outdated and ridiculous laws made decades ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #26
43. Alcohol is legal because of the generation that realized the cure was worse than the disease.
They repealed Prohibition. The generation that endured WWII is called the greatest generation. The generation that repealed prohibition I call the wisest generation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat_patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
25. Yes. We need the tax revenue. Savings on prisons etc.

It is way past time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samsingh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
29. yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
31. yes - and watch the economy boom
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Yes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
34. FUCK YES! knr nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
35. The time is now! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrell9584 Donating Member (549 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
39. At the federal level, yes.
And let states ultimately decide.


On the plus side, my native Mississippi decriminalized it a long time ago. You get caught with pot they give you a ticket. Sadly, I'm not in Mississippi anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
41. Guess where this synthetic crap like "K2" is made? That's right, China. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
branders seine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
44. W-A-Y past time
Edited on Wed Mar-24-10 01:44 PM by branders seine
it will suck living in third world Amerca without good legal drugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
45. Legalize, Regulate, Tax it. Then, put Peter Tosh on the Ten Dollar Bill.
Okay, maybe not the Peter Tosh part. But the rest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
46. Yes. Being a stoned loser is not a crime.
THis is my standard response.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. Yep. Everyone who smokes pot is a loser.


obviously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rcrush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. Its better than being a worthless drunk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. I used to do both in spades, now I do neither.
Nevertheless, I recognize that there are responsible recreational users of both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flaneur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #46
53. And neither is being an anonymous internet asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #46
56. It's not exactly as if you've a dizzying intellect, yourself. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #46
65. Yes check out these loosers...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #65
72. Point proven by :"loosers"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #72
74. damn!
didn't see the second one. Oh well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
52. My Father would have benefited from the substance if it were legal
making something benign illegal, casting a negative perception onto a medicine is ridiculous and embarrassing. We make war, but people aren't allowed to smoke if they chose too? Drinking is legal yet many times more dangerous and bad for you.... come on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Therellas Donating Member (216 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #52
55. how about making something your body needs and craves illegal?
biological manipulation?
endless source of prisoners and revenue for sure.
depending on your business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
54. Yes - and we should buy it for all...
the Teabaggers. They need some mellowing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MajorChode Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
58. No, it's not time yet
We should spend even more billions on the losing battle of enforcement, wait until Mexican drug violence spills over across the border even more than it has, and force more and more young people to deal with drug dealers to get the stuff. Look at how well simple solutions have worked, like those commercials that said if you're a pothead you're supporting the terrorists. Millions of wingnuts can't be wrong about this.

Remember what the portly wingnut pundit says...
There's nothing good about drug use. We know it. It destroys individuals. It destroys families. Drug use destroys societies. Drug use, some might say, is destroying this country. And we have laws against selling drugs, pushing drugs, using drugs, importing drugs. And the laws are good because we know what happens to people in societies and neighborhoods, which become consumed by them. And so if people are violating the law by doing drugs, they ought to be accused and they ought to be convicted and they ought to be sent up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftyladyfrommo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
60. I wish they would hurry up. I've been waiting for 40 years.
And I could really use a joint right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrmpa Donating Member (707 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
61. hell yes
Think of the revenue the US could take in. I haven't used it since the '70's, but some days, I think how sweet it would be, as I suffer from chronic pain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
62. Is a bear Catholic? Does the Pope shit in the woods? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
64. absolutely! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
66. Perverse argument I heard against legalization today:
It will reduce the price of medical marijauna and hurt business!!! No joke!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #66
75. I read that too--it's a sick argument that puts profit ahead of people's civil rights. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
67. YES - and give it out FREE to all the Teabaggers before they get MORE violent!!!
these repuke fucks need to mellow out and fast!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Midway Rebel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 02:36 AM
Response to Original message
68. Absolutely no
doubt about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kitty Herder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 02:41 AM
Response to Original message
69. Of course.
I think that's one thing we mostly agree on around here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NecklyTyler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 05:51 AM
Response to Original message
70. Yes
The short answer is "Yes, legalize it."

Growing and smoking at home is nobody's business
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NecklyTyler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 05:52 AM
Response to Original message
71. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 17th 2017, 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC