Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chief justice unsettled by Obama's criticism of Supreme Court

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Ohio Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 08:07 AM
Original message
Chief justice unsettled by Obama's criticism of Supreme Court
John G. Roberts Jr. tells law students that the president's rebuke of a ruling on corporate campaign funding and the subsequent cheering at the State of the Union address were 'very troubling.'

http://www.latimes.com/news/nation-and-world/la-na-roberts-speech10-2010mar10,0,4550858.story

You fuck our country in the ass and then your troubled when you get called on it in public?

The SOU is exactly where you should be rebuked as you helped fuck the state of the union even more then it was. Fuck you John Roberts... Just Fuck You!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
StClone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. Roberts will not be remember as a great SCOTUS Jurist
Just a long-lived hack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nevergiveup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. Sorry John
What goes around comes around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. And how is Chief Justice Closet Case these days?

one word: Hack

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slampoet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
17. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
4. Well, your honor...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
5. What other presidents have said
Edited on Wed Mar-10-10 09:16 AM by hobbit709
"To consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges are as honest as other men and not more so. They have with others the same passions for party, for power, and the privilege of their corps. Their maxim is boni judicis est ampliare jurisdictionem , and their power the more dangerous as they are in office for life and not responsible, as the other functionaries are, to the elective control. The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with the corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots. It has more wisely made all the departments co-equal and co-sovereign within themselves."
—Thomas Jefferson to William C. Jarvis, 1820.

Theodore Roosevelt, however, holds the record for criticism of courts in State of the Union addresses. In his 1906 and 1908 State of the Union addresses, Roosevelt made extensive and stinging remarks about state and federal judges who invalidated economic regulatory legislation and who issued injunctions against the legitimate activities of labor unions. In his 1908 address, Roosevelt declared that “udges of this stamp do lasting harm by their decisions because they convince poor men in need of protection that the courts of the land are profoundly ignorant of and out of sympathy with their needs.” Similarly, in his 1906 address, Roosevelt complained about “flagrant wrongs committed by judges in connection with disputes.” In both addresses, in which Roosevelt devoted thousands of words to discussing judicial issues, Roosevelt professed strong respect for the majority of state and federal judges and for judicial independence, but he warned that the continuation of strong judicial institutions required a wise exercise of judicial power that elevated the rule of law over special interests.

And St. Ronnie criticized roe vs Wade
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
6. White House responds
“What is troubling is that this decision opened the floodgates for corporations and special interests to pour money into elections, drowning out the voices of average Americans,” White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said in a statement.

That’s why Obama “spoke out to condemn the decision and is working with Congress on a legislative response,” Gibbs said.

http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-03-09/obama-spokesman-defends-court-criticism-after-roberts-remarks.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DisgustedInMN Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
7. Roberts is POS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
8. Oh. Thought it said "unSEATED." Wishful thinking!1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
9. Good, I hope he doesn't sleep at night.
Lots of people want respect they don't deserve. And the SCOTUS as an institution will never salvage its reputation after Bush v. Gore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brewman_Jax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
10. Really, Mr. Chief Justice
because if you had any sort of integrity, you'd have resigned, rather than suffer having your dirty laundry aired in public. As we all know, integrity is to repubs as sunlight is to vampires. :eyes:

Just fuck off, Roberts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
11. Well jeez, John. Just grant cert to one of those birther cases
and declare Obama a Kenyan.
It's not like you care about the law or precedence or anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
12. Awww ...poor Johnny boy ...will this help?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zaj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
13. Free Speech
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zaj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Person
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
randr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
14. Who would have thought this dipwad would get his panties up his crack?
Fucking hall monitor!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
16. Manchurian activist judge. A good reason to put away the Obama criticism
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
18. I just don't see how the Supreme Court Justices expected to be free of
criticism in a country like America that values free speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
19. He's wealthy first, a federalist second, a judge third and a citizen last nt
he cares nothing about the people of this nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC