Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The little-told story of how the U.S. government poisoned alcohol to kill 10,000 Americans

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
heli Donating Member (276 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 03:53 PM
Original message
The little-told story of how the U.S. government poisoned alcohol to kill 10,000 Americans
http://www.slate.com/id/2245188/

The Chemist's War
The little-told story of how the U.S. government poisoned alcohol during Prohibition with deadly consequences.
By Deborah Blum

It was Christmas Eve 1926, the streets aglitter with snow and lights, when the man afraid of Santa Claus stumbled into the emergency room at New York City's Bellevue Hospital. He was flushed, gasping with fear: Santa Claus, he kept telling the nurses, was just behind him, wielding a baseball bat. Before hospital staff realized how sick he was — the alcohol-induced hallucination was just a symptom — the man died. So did another holiday partygoer. And another. As dusk fell on Christmas, the hospital staff tallied up more than 60 people made desperately ill by alcohol and eight dead from it. Within the next two days, yet another 23 people died in the city from celebrating the season.

Doctors were accustomed to alcohol poisoning by then, the routine of life in the Prohibition era. The bootlegged whiskies and so-called gins often made people sick. The liquor produced in hidden stills frequently came tainted with metals and other impurities. But this outbreak was bizarrely different. The deaths, as investigators would shortly realize, came courtesy of the U.S. government. Frustrated that people continued to consume so much alcohol even after it was banned, federal officials had decided to try a different kind of enforcement. They ordered the poisoning of industrial alcohols manufactured in the United States, products regularly stolen by bootleggers and resold as drinkable spirits. The idea was to scare people into giving up illicit drinking. Instead, by the time Prohibition ended in 1933, the federal poisoning program, by some estimates, had killed at least 10,000 people...

I learned of the federal poisoning program while researching my new book, The Poisoner's Handbook, which is set in jazz-age New York. My first reaction was that I must have gotten it wrong. "I never heard that the government poisoned people during Prohibition, did you?" I kept saying to friends, family members, colleagues.

I did, however, remember the U.S. government's controversial decision in the 1970s to spray Mexican marijuana fields with Paraquat, an herbicide. Its use was primarily intended to destroy crops, but government officials also insisted that awareness of the toxin would deter marijuana smokers. They echoed the official position of the 1920s — if some citizens ended up poisoned, well, they'd brought it upon themselves. Although Paraquat wasn't really all that toxic, the outcry forced the government to drop the plan. Still, the incident created an unsurprising lack of trust in government motives, which reveals itself in the occasional rumors circulating today that federal agencies, such as the CIA, mix poison into the illegal drug supply...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. They still do.
"Denatured" ethyl alcohol is still the way alcohol used as a solvent or fuel is sold. The goal is still the same, to keep people from drinking it.

The difference is that, today, we can buy as much alcohol to drink as we like, so there's no reason to drink industrial alcohol. Not so during Prohibition.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. kick for later
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manifestor_of_Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. And then there's "Jakeleg" a disease caused by contaminated drink.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. They did it in the 70's to pot in Mexico too,
only it would just make you sick, I don't remember anyone dying from it...just remember they sprayed the plants with poison to make users sick, thinking we would stop smoking it....I didn't smoke Mexican so wasn't affected....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Ah . . . "Conspiracy-free-America" . . . !!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Paraquat? (sp?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I think that was it....
Edited on Tue Feb-23-10 04:51 PM by EC
yeah...here from wikipedia

"Paraquat pot"
During the late 1970s, a controversial program sponsored by the US government sprayed paraquat on marijuana fields in Mexico.<8> Since much of this marijuana was subsequently smoked by Americans, the US government's "Paraquat Pot" program stirred much debate. Perhaps in an attempt to deter people from using marijuana, representatives of the program warned that spraying rendered the crop unsafe to smoke.

However, independent bodies have studied paraquat in this use. Jenny Pronczuk de Garbino,<9> stated: "no lung or other injury in marijuana users has ever been attributed to paraquat contamination". Also a United States Environmental Protection Agency manual states: "... toxic effects caused by this mechanism have been either very rare or nonexistent. Most paraquat that contaminates marijuana is pyrolyzed during smoking to dipyridyl, which is a product of combustion of the leaf material itself (including marijuana) and presents little toxic hazard."<[br />
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. Many think that is how they killed quite a few celebrities . . .
Elvis, for one --

Beluschi --

One of the Kennedy kids --

And . . . ????

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. That's what you have to understand about moral purists
They don't care if they have to kill you to make you conform to their idea of what's moral.

They also don't see their own vices as immorality, since they can obviously handle them. They just know the rest of us can't handle them, so they must be made illegal.

If we have the audacity to share those vices anyway, they don't mind killing us to take care of the "problem."

Moral purists are the deadly enemies of any free society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
9. This, Tuskegee...how much more is out there not yet known? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juno jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
11. On another board a poster brought up the ubiquity
of tylenol in pain-killing medications, making constant use (whether legal or not) potentially fatal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thecrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Yeah I had to point that out to my doctor!
He changed my pain prescription on the basis of the Tylenol poisoning I might get if I was having a bad few days of pain. I told him I'd rather have a stronger codeine content and only take half a pill and still get relief without all the Tylenol. He agreed... said he'd never realized that. Duh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
13. k&r n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC