Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

More on Blue Angel's crash:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-28-07 08:43 AM
Original message
More on Blue Angel's crash:
Edited on Sat Apr-28-07 08:48 AM by trof
I got this e-mail this morning. It's speculation, but by someone with a lot of knowledge and experience.

My personal comments regarding high 'G' maneuvers follows the e-mail.
I should explain that a G-suit is a special garment and generally takes the form of tightly-fitting trousers which fit either under or over (depending on the design) the flying suit worn by the aviator or astronaut. The trousers are fitted with inflatable bladders which, when pressurised through a G-sensitive valve in the aircraft or spacecraft, press firmly on the abdomen and legs, thus restricting the draining of blood away from the brain during the period of high 'G' maneuvers.

Pete is a former Navy A-4 and F-18 pilot and instructor.

"More detail available today. Having seen video of the crash, my initial speculation is that there was a G induced loss of consciousness (GLOC). The most aggressive flying in the Blue Angel show takes place in the join ups behind show center. The timing requires "expeditious" join ups involving huge overtake speeds and high G maneuvering in the terminal phase of the rejoin to dissipate the overtake speed. The video I saw shows No.6 closing on the formation for the rejoin, but before he gets there, the jet lags behind the formation, goes outside the turn radius, and descends in seeming controlled flight to the tree line. This would be consistent with GLOC on the rendezvous. If the pilot passed out at the join up, he'd be pulled back on the power. Upon loss of consciousness, the G would ease immediately taking him outside the formation turn radius. At flight idle, the jet would slowly descend. To regain consciousness, the pilot needs blood to flow to the brain which takes a varying amount of time depending how deep the GLOC. The senses return in reverse sequence to their loss. Hearing, then vision, cognition, then motor control. The frustrating part is when you can see and understand the problem but don't have the motor control to manipulate the flight controls appropriately.

I have done this to myself in the Hornet, thankfully not so close to the ground.

Of course, without the determinations of the safety investigation, the foregoing is mere speculation. However, a catastrophic, double engine failure is unheard of in the Hornet, and it would likely provide evidence in smoke, flames and parts emanating from the tailpipes prior to the crash. The media all seem focused on the impact with trees and power lines, but that is inevitable when falling to the earth.

This pilot was no rookie. A former Tomcat driver and TOPGUN grad, he was an experienced fighter pilot. GLOC is something that can effect even the most seasoned pilots and it varies day to day and can turn on something as innocuous as time since the pilot's last meal.

In any event, this is a sad day for the Navy."

And my comment.
trof

You can pass this along if you like. It might shed a tiny bit more light on possible cause of Blues' accident.
The Blue Angels don't wear G-suits. More about that below.

I did a lot of close formation flying in my air guard days. I was part of a TOTALLY UNOFFICIAL ad hoc group of four T-Birds/Blues wannabes. Practiced 4-ship diamond formation loops, rolls, etc. Hey, we were all bulletproof back then.
We had F-84s, which were not equipped with G-suits. High 'G' maneuvers were always a concern.

In pilot training I flew T-37s (no G-suit) and T-38s (G-suit). BIG difference.
Once, when I was a brand newbie in 37s, I couldn't do a Split S to my instructor's satisfaction. He was frustrated with my poor performance. We were on the way back to base and I thought our aerobatic airwork was over. He said "I've got it." and grabbed the stick. I was completely unprepared when he snapped us inverted and said "I'll show you one more time." I was still trying to figure out what we were doing when he started the pullout. I don't know how many Gs we pulled. I went almost immediately to tunnel vision and then total blackout. When I came to I was in what I can only describe as convulsions. My legs and feet were violently kicking the rudder pedals. Scared the hell out of both of us. He took us back to base with a VERY gentle pattern and landing and never said a word about it. And never pulled that crap again.

Last May our group on Ancient Aviators of South Alabama attended a Blues practice at PNS NAS. It's a special invitation to our group each year and always interesting. We get to sit right on the ramp and then go meet and chat with the pilots after practice. I actually met Lt. Cmdr. Kevin Davis last year.

I asked one of them (don't remember if it was Davis or not) about G-suits.
"You guys don't wear G-suits when you come out. Are they somehow part of the equipment already in the cockpit? How do you get into them?"
He grinned kind of sheepishly and said "We don't wear G-suits. I kinda wish we did."
I was flabbergasted.
Still am.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Vexatious Ape Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-28-07 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. That is sad.
Those guys are amazing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-28-07 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. Did he give any explanation as to why they don't wear G-suits?
I would think that they would be as vital to these pilots as flame suits are to race car drivers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aviation Pro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-28-07 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. It restricts their ability to fully deflect controls....
Edited on Sat Apr-28-07 10:00 AM by Aviation Pro
...there was a great article in Aviation Week and Space Technology a couple of years ago on this subject. I'll try to dig it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-28-07 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Interesting. Wonder how and/or why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-28-07 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Nope. He didn't seem to know.
That was just my impression.
He offered no explanation.
At the time, I wondered if it was some kind of macho thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-28-07 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
6. Another theory:
(A bit technical for those not familiar with formation flying, but for what it's worth:)

During the low-level rejoin, the classic threat is that of the concentration and focused gaze of the rejoining pilot on the low (inside) side of the leader's turn towards him being upward. (i.e. he is looking up skywards at the lead aircraft and also at the aircraft that he is supposed to follow in the rejoin). If the leader banks slightly further toward the rejoining #6 for geographic positioning alignment, this can have a much magnified and disproportionate effect upon the team-member rejoining from well down on the "low side" ( i.e. it can cause (for him) an unnoticed and inadvertent significant height loss). This consequence is caused by the distant rejoining team-member rolling and pushing in concert with the leader's roll to a higher bank angle - in order to maintain his correct extended echelon rejoin "line" of relativity (and in order to keep visual contact). This is a well-known cause of accidents in military rejoins, particularly at night or overwater - where inadequate peripheral vision of the proximity of terrain/water can fail the "low-man" formation rejoiner, simply because of where he is looking.
http://www.aviationtoday.com/categories/military/10746.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aviation Pro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-28-07 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Yet another theory....
...maybe it's as simple as spatial disorientation. A momentary distraction in the cockpit and an immediate return to the visual may have caused LCMDR Davis to experience some undesirable yaw feeling in his inner ear. He may have counteracted with a roll and pitch deflection.

Ok, I've got to launch myself, no more theories until I get back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-28-07 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. My instructor was an FAA check pilot
he used to make me recover from spins under the hood. It's a great way to experience vertigo when you flip the hood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-28-07 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
7. Seems silly Prez. Bush wore one for an 8 minute flight at 200ft.
I DO NOT understand why the Blue Angels don't wear G-suits. This makes no sense at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-28-07 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Not a big deal, but he wasn't wearing G-suit.
At least not in the photos I've seen, although many MSM and web articles incorrectly referred to him as wearing one.

These aren't great pix, but the guy on the left has a G-suit on. You can make out the hose fitting and it looks skin tight.

Bush is wearing a flight suit and parachute harness, no G-suit.

BTW, it's the harness leg straps that make his 'package' poke out.
And it goes to once more prove what an imbecile he is.

When you're seated in the cockpit you tighten the legs straps up to 'just barely comfortable'. That's so that if you have to eject the opening shock of the parachute canopy won't snatch your nuts off.
(You should pardon the expression ;-))

If you should stand up, stretching the lower body and torso out, the barely comfortable tightness of the leg straps while seated becomes EXTREMELY uncomfortable, even painful. That's why as soon as you land you release the leg straps. If you should forget, you'll be painfully reminded as soon as you try to stand.
But not our Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-28-07 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Oh, you're right! He's not. I stand/sit corrected. But I'm anxious to know why....
the Blue Angels do not.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-28-07 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. The GWB Action Figure a friend gave me - he's wearing a G-suit. That's where I went wrong!
I really need to get the whole ensemble off of him to see how anatomically correct he is.

But getting all that gear back on would be difficult.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-28-07 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Action Figures have led me astray more than once.
Like GI Joe...
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-28-07 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. You still won't find a G-suit. But if it's all that accurate, you WILL find a G-string
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-28-07 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I can't believe it took so long for someone to make that joke. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC