Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Roughly 1 in 4 Americans is employed to keep fellow citizens in line and protect private wealth..

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-08-10 01:26 PM
Original message
Roughly 1 in 4 Americans is employed to keep fellow citizens in line and protect private wealth..
A very interesting article about an actual liberal economist, Samuel Bowles, and his ideas.

http://sfreporter.com/stories/born_poor/5339/all/

Inequality leads to an excess of what Bowles calls “guard labor.” In a 2007 paper on the subject, he and co-author Arjun Jayadev, an assistant professor at the University of Massachusetts, make an astonishing claim: Roughly 1 in 4 Americans is employed to keep fellow citizens in line and protect private wealth from would-be Robin Hoods.

The job descriptions of guard labor range from “imposing work discipline”—think of the corporate IT spies who keep desk jockeys from slacking off online—to enforcing laws, like the officers in the Santa Fe Police Department paddy wagon parked outside of Walmart.

The greater the inequalities in a society, the more guard labor it requires, Bowles finds. This holds true among US states, with relatively unequal states like New Mexico employing a greater share of guard labor than relatively egalitarian states like Wisconsin.

The problem, Bowles argues, is that too much guard labor sustains “illegitimate inequalities,” creating a drag on the economy. All of the people in guard labor jobs could be doing something more productive with their time—perhaps starting their own businesses or helping to reduce the US trade deficit with China.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-08-10 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's so astonishing it's nearly unbelievable
It must include many in various kinds of supervisory capacity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Midway Rebel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-08-10 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. Somebody has to protect those vulnerable rich folks from us riff-raff
Thus the ever thickening "thin-blue-line".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-08-10 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. My spouse was just saying that a cousin of his has
Edited on Mon Feb-08-10 01:57 PM by truedelphi
Full time employment - he is a Blackwater security person over in Iraq. The guy served three tours there first.

Sad when the only people assured of getting full time, high wage earnings are mercenaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-08-10 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. Get back in your Free Speech Zone!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-08-10 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. A bro-in-law of mine is an IT 'spy' re porn, & he works at a MAJOR insurance Co
He's had to 'tsk-tsk' higher ups who could, he supposes, have his job by the day's end if they really wanted to push him - I guess their want of their secretive online doings is what keeps em quiet lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenStormCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-08-10 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. Reality check time. Does that look like the world around me?
No, it doesn't. I don't see 1/4 of the people around me working being guards.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-08-10 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. Anarchist party? Get rid of everyone who protects anyone?
Edited on Mon Feb-08-10 02:07 PM by stray cat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-08-10 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Shades of grey are remarkably difficult fot black and white thinkers to comprehend..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-08-10 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
8. This percentage employed over time, the past century, would make for an interesting graph.
This doesn't surprise me.

I remember pondering some years ago that increasingly an American would either be working for the government, incarcerated, wealthy, or in servitude.

The middle class, with secure job and benefits, is a dying breed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-08-10 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
10.  K&R
I wonder how long it would take for the uber-elite criminals to hyper-inflate currency to the point where $250,000 was the new price of a loaf of bread.

According to Wikipedia, one year after the publishing of the Gini Coefficient, the Federal Reserve was created!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-08-10 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. Yup. USA is very close to Mexico on equality index. And rich people
are always at risk for kidnapping there. Why won't the rich understand that. It is better to pay taxes at 40% than live with medieval like insecurity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC