Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

My breakdown of the debate, by candidate.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 08:43 PM
Original message
My breakdown of the debate, by candidate.
In order determined by my brain:

Obama did alright, but didn't show himself to the best effect the way a lot of his speeches do. He came off looking wise and reasoned, though, which benefits him.

Hillary neither gained nor lost. She did nothing to hurt herself, but she also didn't make any real converts. She's really got to find another way to deal with her IWR vote, though, otherwise that non-answer answer is going to keep garotting her until the elections. Better to get an apology out of the way now, and have time for the issue to go away, rather than have to do it out of desperation later.

Mike Gravel definitely benefitted most. While his tone seemed harsh and overly angry at times, he got the best shots and statements in of any of the candidates, and made some points that no one else was willing or able to make.

Biden helped himself a bit by undoing some of his foot-in-mouth disease, and presenting a more statesman-like public face.

Kucinich was, well, Kucinich. He said good stuff, but he sometimes goes a little over the top and hurts himself, such as when he talked about getting rid of our nuclear weapons.

Edwards lacked punch. If he wants to make headway, he's got to let himself be a little bit more agressive, a little more the trial lawyer, rather than trying to nice-guy his way to the White House.

Dodd did surprisingly well, and although I don't think that he'll get a major boost from this, he did come out quite well compared to the low expectations for him.

Bill Richardson came off worst of all the candidates--he seemed off his game, and some of his answers seemed almost defensive and off-key. Maybe it's just his nature as a moderate western Dem, but he seemed almost like he was trying to stake out the center a little too clearly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Superb analysis
Although I think Edwards did well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frustratedlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Edwards needs to stop quoting facts...
When he is answering a question, he often goes off on statistics or throws in numbers and facts that immediately put people to sleep. He needs to be more spontaneous and not sound overly rehearsed. I like him, but I can't listen to him long, and I hate that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Edwards was okay, but he should have been better.
You don't become a successful trial lawyer by being as laid-back as he was tonight. He'd do better if he let his fire show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellenfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. too many soundbytes. i was
particularly disappointed in kucinich. he was campaigning, as was richardson. too many non-answered questions as well. altho' i thought hillary did fine with her response re her iraq vote. gravel was great! the only one up there who spoke his mind no holds barred!

ellen fl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC