|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
CatWoman
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 12:25 PM Original message |
The Enquirer was right about everything else |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Peregrine Took
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 12:27 PM Response to Original message |
1. I'm officially un-shockable when it comes to Edwards. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 01:57 PM Response to Reply #1 |
26. I thought I was, too, but this story proved me wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LaydeeBug
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 12:29 PM Response to Original message |
2. wow!. The end of an ego... it's too bad because his message was on point, and now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 12:30 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 12:30 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Which message? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 02:16 PM Response to Reply #5 |
32. The people he hired to write the various proposals for 2008 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 03:16 PM Response to Reply #32 |
37. One (Non Edwards) effect of this - it will likely lead to more obtrusive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ghost in the Machine
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 07:39 PM Response to Reply #37 |
61. The first time someone says that, they should be answered with "why not look at David Vitter.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 09:50 PM Response to Reply #61 |
62. You misunderstood |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus
![]() |
Thu Feb-04-10 10:17 AM Response to Reply #32 |
68. I'd wonder about substance abuse, but with all the ugly coming out already it seems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LaydeeBug
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 05:22 PM Response to Reply #5 |
44. The timeless FACT that there are one set of rules for the rich, and another for "the rest" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 10:00 PM Response to Reply #44 |
63. Easy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vadawg
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 12:30 PM Original message |
seems the both of them are peas of a pod, both need to have the attention |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Missy Vixen
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
41. Stop blaming the victim |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FedUpWithIt All
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 06:39 PM Response to Reply #41 |
53. Sources are also saying that she had previously assulted him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Missy Vixen
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 07:01 PM Response to Reply #53 |
57. I'm wondering how many here had to deal with a philandering spouse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FedUpWithIt All
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 11:05 PM Response to Reply #57 |
64. One source testimony is accepted, no questions asked... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vadawg
![]() |
Thu Feb-04-10 08:56 AM Response to Reply #41 |
65. yeah shes so the victim in this, im sorry but she was as involved in the cover up as anyone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Missy Vixen
![]() |
Thu Feb-04-10 11:33 AM Response to Reply #65 |
71. Wow, it must make you feel tough to beat up on a woman who had no other realistic choices |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 12:29 PM Response to Original message |
3. John Edwards is a never ending disaster |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tonysam
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 03:32 PM Response to Reply #3 |
40. No, JRE is a never-ending obsession with people who consumed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 12:30 PM Response to Original message |
6. The NE has apparently always had solid sources for its Edwards stories. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 12:41 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. And they are not going to blow their most credible story ever with something |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 12:47 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. GMTA. This Edwards mess has boosted its credibility more than anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 01:26 PM Response to Reply #11 |
20. they were pretty credible when it came to o.j. as well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 01:52 PM Response to Reply #6 |
24. Of course they have. Edwards has a habit of surrounding himself with weaselly scumbags. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 01:57 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Ugh. Like the guy who wrote the sleazy book about him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 12:31 PM Response to Original message |
7. Me too CW. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CatWoman
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 02:04 PM Response to Reply #7 |
28. story of my life, Cleita |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Manifestor_of_Light
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 07:16 PM Response to Reply #7 |
58. Polygraph tests are NOT admissible in court. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 07:17 PM Response to Reply #58 |
59. Well I agree. But there are employers out there who won't even |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David Zephyr
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 12:32 PM Response to Original message |
8. I hope Elizabeth soaks him for every penny and then some. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
piratefish08
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 12:37 PM Response to Original message |
9. The Enquirer is more honest and trustworthy than the MSM. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
biscotti
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 12:38 PM Response to Original message |
10. I wonder how his parents |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kadie
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 12:41 PM Response to Original message |
12. This story just keeps getting worse. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stray cat
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 01:05 PM Response to Original message |
14. The baby is an alien? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CatWoman
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 02:05 PM Response to Reply #14 |
29. and Bat Boy is set to adopt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hlthe2b
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 01:06 PM Response to Original message |
15. I don't know, but I have certainly observed that in nasty divorces... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stray cat
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 01:08 PM Response to Original message |
16. If the cops have a record of a call to the house that would be interesting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kadie
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 01:22 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. This came out last week. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 01:20 PM Response to Original message |
17. John Edwards is a SLIME ball. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 01:50 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. Here's the thing: when a politician espouses the rhetoric you want to hear you might go for him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ParkieDem
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 01:52 PM Response to Reply #17 |
23. I did too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 02:01 PM Response to Reply #17 |
27. I supported him because of his policy priorities. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DonkeyHoTay
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 06:07 PM Response to Reply #17 |
47. Slime ball? OR Lime ball? Stolen wallet was lime green! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 01:23 PM Response to Original message |
19. You know, even after everything, this shocks me... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 01:29 PM Response to Original message |
21. I told you so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CatWoman
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 02:09 PM Response to Reply #21 |
30. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 02:31 PM Response to Reply #21 |
33. You did say it - with all that supporting it in many strong posts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Thu Feb-04-10 10:30 AM Response to Reply #21 |
70. I and a few other NC'linians here knew he was fake as a Senator...But, I feel bad that he's come to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
guruoo
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 02:13 PM Response to Original message |
31. Did Elizabeth take the lie detector, or was that given to just her "pals" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fumesucker
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 03:31 PM Response to Reply #31 |
38. That was my thought too.. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davepc
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
34. Imagine if he had won the nomination and all this stuff then came out? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 02:36 PM Response to Original message |
35. I can't believe this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LibertyLover
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 02:46 PM Response to Original message |
36. I read, and I believe it was on DU last week, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marshall
![]() |
Thu Feb-04-10 10:27 AM Response to Reply #36 |
69. The Enquirer started getting "street cred" with the JonBenet stuff |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tonysam
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 03:32 PM Response to Original message |
39. Edwards thread number twenty to hide. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CatWoman
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 03:34 PM Response to Reply #39 |
43. So |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueIris
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 06:27 PM Response to Reply #43 |
49. Some perspective: the bashing is being done based on a *tabloid* "news" story. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CatWoman
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 06:35 PM Response to Reply #49 |
52. you need to acquaint yourself with (1) facts, and (2) history |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niceypoo
![]() |
Thu Feb-04-10 11:41 AM Response to Reply #52 |
72. Hmmmmm.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 06:05 PM Response to Reply #39 |
45. So why did you post here? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goldcanyonaz
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 06:56 PM Response to Reply #39 |
55. I don't think there have been enough threads about what a scumbag he is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SKKY
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 03:34 PM Response to Original message |
42. Just based on the fact that I donated actual money to this guy's campaign... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 06:06 PM Response to Reply #42 |
46. He sure fooled a lot of people! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue-Jay
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 06:08 PM Response to Original message |
48. You didn't "know" him to begin with. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CatWoman
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 06:33 PM Response to Reply #48 |
51. every time I see that damn squirrel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue-Jay
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 06:47 PM Response to Reply #51 |
54. I only keep the squirrel because I know that you love him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 06:31 PM Response to Original message |
50. Did she also pass the test? It's pretty rare that someone as manipulative |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
undeterred
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 07:01 PM Response to Original message |
56. Oh I thought this was going to be about Oprah. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raine
![]() |
Wed Feb-03-10 07:30 PM Response to Original message |
60. Just when you think it can't get any worse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane
![]() |
Thu Feb-04-10 10:03 AM Response to Original message |
66. He's out-Gingriched, Gingrich. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deutsey
![]() |
Thu Feb-04-10 10:07 AM Response to Original message |
67. I always liked his message, but had lots of reservations about him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HillGal
![]() |
Thu Feb-04-10 02:25 PM Response to Original message |
73. He's such a sleaze and he always struck me as a sleaze, I never fell for his fakeness. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deaniac21
![]() |
Thu Feb-04-10 05:53 PM Response to Original message |
74. I think you mean you didn't know him before but now you do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Jul 10th 2025, 10:01 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC