Should the government force a parent to donate their kidney to save their kid's life

[Proud2BAmurkin]

Poll question: Should the government force a parent to donate their kidney to save their kid's life

if that's the only way the kid lives?

Men see this in absolute terms and being about the government's power, and would say "no" which is why if we had babies the right to abortion would never be debated.

[wildhorses]

1. well, if they are going to force them to have the kids then

shouldn't they force them to keep them alive at all costs:shrug:

oh and btw :sarcasm:

[ixion]

4. ah, but therein lies the hypocrisy

because as soon as the baby gets out of the womb, their ideology moves to 'survival of the fittest'.

[kestrel91316]

2. Fair's fair. If they overturn Roe v Wade I could get fully behind

a law that would do just that.

For the sake of consistency, you know.

[aquart]

3. Excellent analogy. Yank that organ!

How about a sliver of liver?

[phantom power]

5. Interesting. Should we all be forced to donate blood?

That would actually save a lot more lives.

[sweettater]

6. For god's sake

what kind of parent wouldn't donate a kidney to their child??????????????? I would DIE for mine!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Proud2BAmurkin]

7. What kind of parent wouldn't donate a kidney? A "bad" one. Should government force them?

That's the question.

[orpupilofnature57]

8. No ,not now but in the future when parenting will require a license ,

it very well may be a requirement.

[TahitiNut]

9. All four kids?

Sure. :evilgrin: