where are the teabaggers? do they support the supreme court ruling?

[spanone]

i thought they wanted their country back?

dumbfucks

[Sanity Claws]

1. Most of them support whatever Fox tells them to support

[rurallib]

4. I don't think FUX has told them about this yet.

FUX probably doesn't think they are smart enough.

[Ken Burch]

2. They're back in the corporate mail rooms.

n/t.

[baldguy]

3. They have no opinion.

They haven't been provided one.

[FrenchieCat]

5. They are supported by Fox, and Fox likes the decision.

[scheming daemons]

6. They aren't a REAL group... just racists ginned up by Dick Armey and company

They don't even know what they stand for. They just know that hate that a black man is President.

[valerief]

7. What is that blonde asshole telling them to do? nt

[Grand Taurean]

8. The teabagger will do whatever is needed to

take power away from us and back to their corporate masters.
They most certainly support this move.

[lapfog_1]

9. Their funding just got cut

The corporations don't need astro-turf groups like this anymore.

Say goodbye to the bus tours and being driven to events and having paid speakers.

[blm]

10. Poor fools don't even UNDERSTAND what the Gadsden flag means. Now they'll be lifting flags that say

Don't Tread on Marathon Oil

Don't Tread on Microsoft

Don't Tread on Murdoch

Don't Tread on Rev Moon

[Blue_Tires]

16. very true

but then again it's not like any of them actually read the constitution, or even researched the events leading up to the original Boston Tea Party...(part of me is surprised that some historical preservation society hasn't asked them to stop using that name)

[Blue_Tires]

11. oh no...they supposedly love their free market

and the teabaggers were just a well orchestrated sideshow, most of them bored Ron Paul-voting nutbars left with their dicks in their hands after he quit the race...

and where in fuck's name IS their patron saint, Ron Paul while this is going on??

[TxRider]

12. They seem to be saying

That it is a victory for the first amendment, and frees organizations that back both parties to speak their piece.

I expect congress to write laws around the decision.

[spanone]

13. do they believe the corporations care about them? bwahahahahaa

[MiniMe]

14. They think the corporations will give them money for their "cause"

[Orangepeel]

15. the ruling removes the reason that corporations used to support their "cause"

Last week, corporations could give unlimited funds to support issue oriented PACs but not to advertise directly in support of a politician. Tomorrow, corporations won't need them.

[LeftinOH]

17. The SC ruling isn't a tangible issue, like a black man in the WH, or marriage equality,

or a fetus- there is literally nothing to see or hear; campaign contributions are behind-the scenes (sort of), and don't make any noise at at all. Right-wingers respond to tangibles; the SC ruling is too abstract for many of them.