Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Brown Must Not Be Seated Before Ballot Tampering Investigated (In Event He Wins).

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 07:00 PM
Original message
Brown Must Not Be Seated Before Ballot Tampering Investigated (In Event He Wins).
Edited on Tue Jan-19-10 07:03 PM by KittyWampus
So far 5 ballots in three districts were found pre-marked for Brown.

I don't care if he wins.

He can not be seated until the ballot tampering is accounted for.

While working out today I was listening to news, CNN had Republicans on saying how Brown must be seated immediately. Now we know why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. we have the Franken precendent working for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Certification and then a period of 10 days I believe....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Sec. of State-Ma, Bill Galvin was on today and said if it breaks
in favor of either candidate with a mandate that can't be overcome, he will do what he has done in previous special elections for house seats and decide the race and have it non-certified (such as Niki Tsongas). The House of Reps. has accepted this in the past and sworn in the winners to office. Bill Galvin says it will be up to the Senate to decide how they want to procede. It could be different than the House. If it is too close to call then it will be on hold for the candidates and certification.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. Thanks for the clarification. Confusing...LOL...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R...already the MSM is "Calling this for Brown" and Coakley Campaign seeing Irregularities...
Need to keep on top of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. Given her campaign, the question is "Will Coakley concede before 11:00 PM?"...
I mean, wouldn't want to lose a night's sleep....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. Do we also not seat Coakley?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Very good question.
Some are saying Brown should be seated even with a win of 7% or more.

Obama won by 7% should be Republican have stopped/delayed/disrupted the inaguration? Its only 7% right never can be sure.

We shouldn't be adding to a precedent of striping people of their representation (even if it is someone who is a dumbass).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. If There's A Challenge, Yes
FYI the math is not as relevant. GOP needs 40 to filbstr.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. The GOP need 40 to filibuster?
Really??????

I didn't know that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. See Below
D'oh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. It takes 60 votes to invoke cloture.
A cloture motion would fail 59-1.

The majority needs 60, the opposition does not need 41.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. The Mass Seat Would Remain Filled
Edited on Tue Jan-19-10 07:58 PM by Beetwasher
My bad though, yr right. But the math would not change by delaying coakley.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. have there been any irregularities regarding vote tampering that would favor her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
branders seine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
11. In the spirit of bipartisanship, and to keep from being just as bad as
the republicans,

if Brown wins, we should do everything possible to seat him promptly.
















:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
12. He should be frankened. Or alfrankened. For months, he should be refused his seat. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC