Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Candy Crowley: "Rev Up Security Moms"-Save Us President Daddy (by digby)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 08:25 PM
Original message
Candy Crowley: "Rev Up Security Moms"-Save Us President Daddy (by digby)
Edited on Tue Dec-29-09 08:26 PM by kpete
Save Us President Daddy

by digby

Please just shoot me now. The media has gone insane. Suzanne Malveaux just asked Candy Crowley how the voters in 2010 are going to rank the president's response to this failed terror attempt. It's a stupid question, but the answer really takes the cake:

Candy Crowley: I think the fact that we have seen him for two days in a row is the White House recognizing that this is perhaps more important --- the safety of the American people ---than jobs at this point. It wouldn't take much to rev up security moms who were so important in 2000 and 2004. So I think what voters judge is, sort of, the record. So it won't be today, but then what did he do? How safe did he keep us?

.................

That's ridiculous. Did Candy wake up this morning and think it was 2003? The plane didn't go down. Nobody died. The perpetrator is some young, screwed up loser who tried to set his pants on fire. The only "security mom" who cares more about that than the fact that she doesn't have a job is a well paid television celebrity.

.................

Unless we actually have a terrorist attack, I think we can feel fairly confident that the 2010 election will be about the economy. This failed attempt was a wake-up call, but it's not the equivalent of the Pearl Harbor. And this media revival of Daddy Keep Us Safe is nothing but a cheap sideshow.

http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2009/12/save-us-president-daddy-by-digby-please.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Back to the buffet, Candy
Edited on Tue Dec-29-09 08:28 PM by bluestateguy
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. That was well said. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. The news make up the news!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. She must have got the fax with the new meme from the RNC.
Just trying out a new talking point, just to see how it polls.

Besides that, she is a blithering idiot that never has had one thing of import to bring to a discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. If Ms. Crowley wants to be treated like a child
...then perhaps she should be clued into a common bit of parental wisdom:

Kids often react based on the clues provided by Dad. If Dad freaks, the kids freak. If Dad remains calm, the kids go to sleep dreaming of rainbows and butterflies.

Candy Crowley is a simpleton with a platform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. "A simpleton with a platform". Perfect description, but she's just doing her job. She's a parrot.
There are so many simpleton parrots with platforms nowadays that it's depressing. Thank Dawg for Rachel Maddow and Ed Schultz, who are less "parroty" than the rest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC