|
Edited on Mon Dec-21-09 06:28 PM by kenny blankenship
or rather, it was kept there as part of the negotiations long enough to forestall us from crying bloody murder at them. But only that long. When they didn't need it anymore - poof it was gone!
Remember who put Health Care Reform on the agenda? It was not Barack Obama. He didn't have a health plan at all until he was shamed into getting one by other Democratic primary candidates.
WE PUT IT ON THE AGENDA. Democratic primary voters. You know : those stinkin awful Liberals. And what did we want? Single Payer. And Obama agreed with us, at least far as trying to convince us he shared our values and ideals: he said Single Payer would be his choice if designing a system from scratch. He pledged to support something else called a Public Option because that would likewise be a social, PUBLIC response to the private sector collapse, but one which would exist alongside the existing private sector insurance and eventually grow to eclipse it. Having a token public sector response was enough to cause us whacky liberal Democratic primary voters to identify with him, and later, it would keep us "invested" in the process of passing some kind of HCR legislation once we had made Obama President. He made sure to convince us he was a liberal, public sector kind of guy by condemning Hillary Clinton's Private Sector uber alles approach of Individual Mandates forcing the purchase of for profit health insurance.
But then he got into office.
Whatever they promised the people during the election, Obama and the Democratic leadership had no commitment to anything but legally mandated support of the Private Sector Insurance Mafia. Everything else was negotiable but individual mandates to purchase traditional insurance. Of course that's not what we voted for. You have to have something to keep people who don't want mandates and who're sick of the private sector collapse QUIET while you work out a deal. You have to have something to keep them from peeling away and bolting. At first they kept us on board by saying even though most would be obligated to buy FOR PROFIT private sector insurance, there would be the PUBLIC OPTION on the other side to balance the ledger. People with the most difficulty buying protection from insurance rackets would find shelter in the Public Option where at least nobody would be squeezing them for profits. That made the compulsory nature of the rest of the proposed measure seem, if not totally fair, at least sensitive to the appearance of fairness. It wasn't Single Payer, but it was more than a token gesture in that direction, we were assured; and we were also assured that in time it would grow into the same thing as Single Payer because the insurance companies couldn't compete with non-profit govt. run insurance, and the eligibility terms would get progressively more open.
Then they set about shaving the Public Option down.
They got out their planes and their sanders and knives. And they whittled it this way and whittled it that way. Always the Public Option shrunk. It's eligibility terms shrunk. There was soon talk of non-national, non-government agency "Co-ops" to run the public option, because apparently the Federal government can't be allowed to do things of this nature, Medicare notwithstanding. Then there was talk of Private, for-profit insurance companies managing the "public option" as if they could be trusted to run something originally intended to provide them with competition and maybe put them out of business. Then there was talk of shelving the Public Option indefinitely - to become active as a program only if and when private sector, for-profit insurance had failed to deliver some unspecified benchmark of performance. All the while they noisily bandied the Public Option around, they were hashing out the other terms of their "reform", the ones that would govern for-profit private insurance. Few remarked that these other terms prominently included a guaranteed revenue stream, backed by the taxpayer. Once they had agreement on the terms of for-profit insurance, guess what happened next? They dropped the Public Option, which had kept us kooky Democrats in line and invested in the success of the "reform", and started to omit any public response to the private sector collapse completely from the legislative program. The Public Option was the compromise position of Single Payer advocates. Now the compromise was not only horribly compromised, it was altogether gone. One last saving throw was attempted by adding an expansion of Medicare for 55 to 64 year olds. But no that was intolerable as well. By the time the Single Payer Public Option Medicare Expansion last vestigial placeholder for any kind of PUBLIC response to the private sector collapse was shitcanned for once and all, the hopes of Democrats had been trashed by so many cycles of vitiating compromise that the last gesture towards anything public disappeared with scarcely a whimper.
They kept the Public Option around to keep us "hooked" until it was too late. At the end they said "it's this or nothing" and gave as their strongest excuse for their chicanery that, if we had the gall to hold them responsible for rooking us, they would lose in the upcoming elections and that would hurt us too. Lovely fucking people, these Democrats.
Hostage takers, Frauds, and Liars. Bribe sponges. Human traffickers.
|