Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rock's hall of fame finally admits the Stooges

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 12:36 PM
Original message
Rock's hall of fame finally admits the Stooges

Source: The Detroit News

http://www.detnews.com/article/20091215/ENT04/912150397/Rock-hall-of-fame-finally-finds--Lust-for-Life---admits-Stooges

Rock's hall of fame finally admits the Stooges

The Rock and Roll Hall of Fame is being hit, finally, with a dose of raw power.

Pioneering Ann Arbor punk rock outfit the Stooges will be admitted into the Rock Hall's Class of 2010, organizers announced today. They will be inducted alongside ABBA, Genesis, the Hollies and Jimmy Cliff at a ceremony to be held March 15 at New York City's Waldorf Astoria hotel.

The Stooges were beginning to become perennial also-rans on the Rock Hall ballot, always the bridesmaid but never the bride. The band played Madonna into the Hall two years ago, offering up punk-thrash renditions of Madge's "Burning Up" and "Ray of Light," but it wasn't enough to grease the wheels for entry into last year's class, as the band was passed up for induction yet again at the 2009 ceremony.

Now, things have been righted for the visceral rockers, who formed in the late 1960s in Ann Arbor.

<more at link)










Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Woo woo woo woo woo woo woo woo!
Nyuk nyuk nyuk...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hmmm...ABBA and NOT Donna Summer...
who is less rock?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Well clearly they are more rock than Rush, Jethro Tull, Yes, Moody Blues, King Crimson......
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. And about as rock as The Supremes....
...there really seems to be very little criteria other than the personal faves of whoever votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cetacea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. ..Procol Harum, Strawbs, Mike Oldfield...
There is clearly discrimination towards prog rockers , no matter how influential or successful.
Still, Abba deserves a spot imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Then change the name to the 'Popular Music' Hall of Fame
Hey, I own ABBA albums and thing they have done some amazing stuff. But ABBA is not 'Rock and Roll'. They are pop music. If Jann Wenner is going to keep influence bands like King Crimoson, yes, Moody Blues, Rush, Jethro Tull and a host of other prog rock bands out of the 'Rock and Roll' Hall of Fame in favor of non-rock pop musicians - then change the name accordingly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. Very Influential band
they deserve it...Gimme danger little stranger...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. Is Iggy Pop considered a separate performer, or is he considered a Stooge?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cirque du So-What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Unless I'm mistaken
Iggy Pop could be admitted both as a member of The Stooges and as a solo act. After all, Paul Simon is in the Hall of Fame both as a solo performer and as a member of Simon & Garfunkel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. Way overdue.
Good to see this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gemini Cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. Finally!
Their first album is one of my all time favourites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cirque du So-What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
9. Long overdue
Bringing in a few more bands like The Stooges will help dispel notions that commercial success is the primary criterion for admission to the R & R Hall of Fame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zodiak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
11. The Rock and Roll Hall of Fame...
...Is a wank-fest.

The indoctrinees are simply the favorite bands of the owner and her circle of very rich, very out of touch friends.

All of those that I know that actually play regard the place as a mausoleum for mainstream losers.

"The main criticism of the Hall of Fame is that the nomination process is controlled by a few individuals who are not musicians, such as founder Jann Wenner, (who has filled the position of managing editor for Rolling Stone magazine), former foundation director Suzan Evans, and writer Dave Marsh, reflecting their tastes rather than the views of the rock world as a whole. A former member of the nominations board once commented that "At one point Suzan Evans lamented the choices being made because there weren't enough big names that would sell tickets to the dinner. That was quickly remedied by dropping one of the doo-wop groups being considered in favor of a 'name' artist...I saw how certain pioneering artists of the '50s and early '60s were shunned because there needed to be more name power on the list, resulting in '70s superstars getting in before the people who made it possible for them. Some of those pioneers still aren't in today."<9> According to Fox News, petitions with tens of thousands of signatures were also being ignored, and some groups that were signed with certain labels or companies or were affiliated with various committee members have even been put up for nomination with no discussion at all.<9>"

I like that the Sex Pistols called the place a "piss stain". It was an accurate description.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
verges Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Okay, first
you don't cite your source. Second, you're source quotes Fox News. Without better than that, you just become electrons on my screen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zodiak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. I yanked it off of wiki, not Fox news
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rock_and_Roll_Hall_of_Fame

It is unfortunate that Fox is cited in the quote, but it is far from the only citation. Here is the rest of the criticism.

"Another criticism is that too many artists are inducted. In fifteen years, 97 different artists have been inducted. A minimum of 50% of the vote is needed to be inducted, although the final percentages are not announced and a certain number of inductees (five in 2009) is set before the ballots are shipped.<10> The committee usually nominates a small number of artists (12 in 2010) from an increasing number of different genres. Several voters, including Joel Selvin, himself a former member of the nominating committee, didn't submit their ballots in 2007 because they didn't feel that any of the candidates were truly worthy.<11>

The Sex Pistols, inducted in 2006, refused to attend the ceremony, calling the museum "a piss stain".<12>
Controversy

On March 14, two days after the 2007 induction ceremony, Roger Friedman of Fox News published an article claiming that The Dave Clark Five should have been the fifth inductee, as they had more votes than inductee Grandmaster Flash and the Furious Five. The article went on to say " used a technicality about the day votes were due in. In reality, The Dave Clark Five got six more votes than Grandmaster Flash. But he felt we couldn't go another year without a rap act."<13>

The Rock & Roll Hall of Fame would later deny fixing the vote, although they did not deny that late votes were received, saying, "No. There is a format and rules and procedure. There is a specific time when the votes have to be in, and then they are counted. The bands with the top five votes got in."<14>

The Dave Clark Five was subsequently nominated again and then inducted the following year.<15>"

Another thing. Unlike those that vote for this museum of mainstream mediocrity, I am an actual musician who is quite familiar with the sensibilities of other musicians. And considering I live in Ohio, I have heard a lot of opinions about the place. They are pretty much in line with the criticisms outlined in this wiki article. Mostly bad.

The place is NOT an accurate representation of the greatest in Rock and Roll, but the greatest in ticket sales. I left the place laughing my ass off at how seriously the public takes this place. The ONLY metal band that was featured in the whole place was Black Sabbath, with their names written on the indoctrinate staircase. As if metal is not Rock and Roll. Heck, even the workers who worked at the totally over-priced souvenir shop thought that the place was a wank-fest. They left out 90% of what was influential in rock and completely focused on record sales.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
verges Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Thank-you. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. That's why Mo Tucker (The Velvet Underground) refers to it as 'The Rock & Roll Hall of Lame'
And she's right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
12. Madonna to Perform "I Wanna Be Your Dog"?
I've never been a fan of hers, but this could make me reconsider.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quispquake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
14. About time!!!
Sadly, too late for Ron Asheton who passed away early this year. But the rest of the band (with James Williamson now on guitar) will still be able to shred pretty hard...Here's hoping they play at the ceremony!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
branders seine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
19. Cool! I always liked Moe.
erk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Popular Front Donating Member (188 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
21. It's about time n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC