Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

At least 127 Iraqis killed in Baghdad attack

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 07:11 AM
Original message
At least 127 Iraqis killed in Baghdad attack
this morning
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/8400865.stm
<snip>
A series of car bombings has killed at least 127 people and wounded 448 in the centre of the Iraqi capital, Baghdad.

The first blast targeted a police patrol in the Dora district of the city. Four others occurred near official buildings within minutes.

Iraqi national security adviser Mowaffaq al-Rubaie blamed al-Qaeda militants for the attacks.

He told the BBC their aim was to destabilise the country ahead of general elections due in February.

"Al-Qaeda has been active in Baghdad recently," Mr Rubaie said.

"The aim is to show the government is unable to protect civilians and its own people and also to deter people from going to ballot boxes."
---------------
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/8400865.stm

I weep for the people of Iraq. Thanks Bushco.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. highly coordinated attacks
in addition to rightly blaming bush let me add a fuck you to these asshole murderers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. "Now, watch this drive. Smirk." - xCommander AWOL (R)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. So, why is it ok for us to pull out of Iraq, but not Afghanistan?
Sorry, but there is a real disconnect in the logic on the part of those who claim we must stay in Afghanistan to train an army and prevent extremists from returning. In Iraq, all the same arguments could be made. But, they aren't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC